Search results

For some things we trust for some things we don't however is worth mentioning and especially that ancient Macedonians were not aliens to their neighbors.Read for example about the Paeonian tribe of Agrianes and their service in the Macedonian army.Thracians, Illyrians or any other so it will not...

Polybius (23.10.4) mentions that Emathia was earliest called Paeonia and Strabo (frg 7.38) that Paeonia was extended to Pieria and Pelagonia.

The samples from Marvinci is actually ancient Idomenae as archeologist believe which is pretty close to Macedonian core if you want to put Emathia as such,and by the time some of this samples are dated Idomenae was ancient Macedonian domain I guess,how much and whether Emathians or Macedonians...

Why would you look for such interpretation when even Greek Macedonia was not so much foreign for Slavic speakers you have tribes as Drougobitai,Sagudates,Rhynchinoi that were living around in Greek Macedonia in 7th century.Let aside modern day period.And present day North Macedonia and Greek...

I know never said it was.

I am not fan of the steppe.I was saying that probably later groups brought more E-V13 in the Balkans and coming from more northern areas were more steppe admixed.So they brought more steppe in Balkans.For me is interesting cause we found it among Slavs,absorbed for sure.Was interested for deep...

E-V13 was also found in Hungarian conquerors along I2a and in some early West Slavic samples?

This was done according to sampling and have read about it long ago might have been bias if the people were from same region or related but Pannonian Rusyns carry 12,5 % E-V13 from 200 samples and interestingly people from Zakarpathia or Bukovina carry 30% I2a which will make them more similar...

The Thracian E-V13 from Bulgaria should be tested for more deep clades to check their descendants today.Cause it might appear that E-V13 brought more steppe in the Balkans in later migrations stages maybe.Someone can correct me if I am wrong but so far it was found among Scythian sample from...

Hmm.. Interesting 🤔 I-L621, Bulgaria EBA, 3000-2000 BCE, Kazanlak, Tell Kran (Central, Yasenovo). I-CTS4002, Romania BA, 2150-1850 BCE, Cârlomănești Arman. 1873-1630 calBCE (3430±25 BP, PSUAMS-3982), Locality: Trestiana, Romania, Y-DNA: R-Y2613

If we mix Eastern European and Japanese we might get Kazakhstan autosomal for example,if we mix mid east and north Europe we might get Balkans or Italy,Anatolia or whatever, depends on autosomal profile.So you can rather have ancestry that mimic similarity with Balkan people and not that you...

And let me add that I do not deny the migration and invasions in Balkans by Slavs as someone here want to add,but from where they came in what numbers is a matter of discussion.

Mr. Milan doesn't understand the difference between what I found versus what the authors of the study found. There's a saying about not shooting the messenger. He also doesn't know not to insult moderators.

Again you lol.I can cite you many more but I bet you do not know any of them.I can bet that you never read a book about history of Slavs but take your 'quick' knowledge on wikipedia and you try to school other people here about the said history.For example calling a man loon who is professor of...

They choose these Slavs from Ingria because no other model could explain the genetic makeup of South Slavs and Balkans in general,Iron age and present day. However the Slav that was found in the Balkans was not Ingrian,so why we care about Ingria concerning the Balkans.This has more to do with...

They are probably not aware of new works in history and archeology of Slavs,South Slavs in general and that is mainstream,other than 19th century crazy nordicist theories about migration from supposed urheimat and what not.I must say however that the imagination and story making is amazing but...

They choose these Slavs from Ingria because no other model could explain the genetic makeup of South Slavs and Balkans in general,Iron age and present day. However the Slav that was found in the Balkans was not Ingrian,so why we care about Ingria concerning the Balkans.This has more to do with...

Your contribution so far is only with insults and bias toward certain people.That really show your own intellectual level not mine.This low answers doesn't seem to help,consult some specialist in the field.

Neither I am Serbian nor I know or care who Razib Khan is much less to spam him.And by the same token you are not real Italian,but a mix of Etruscan who are not IE,Lombard Germanic and much more.How that feel? And what is even real or not is not on me to judge especially not certain people...

This logic who is real and not is pretty nationalistic at best.It is same as saying north Italians are the real Italians and south are not,or only Mycenaean were real Greeks present day are not,south Swedes are real Germanics and Austrians not and such dubious comparison can go on and on.Please...