But I'm not even disagreeing with you that the skin color is defintiely and suspiciously too dark. I won't get into the discussion of whether this is just unconscious bias or a deliberate choice influenced by modern conceptions of race (or rather their attempt to debunk traditional racial theories), but I just thought you were tremendously insensitive and yes, even if unwillingly, downright racist with your specific "example" of an African-American woman whose remains would be comparable to what you believe the British Neolithic woman looks like. Sorry, but it was just typical negative stereotyping whether it was deliberate or - as I believe - not.
I don't think she looks African-American at all, only if you mean the "whitest", most European-shifted extreme of the phenotypic spectrum of African-Americans, people that would definitely not be considered black in other countries more used to mixed-race varieties like Brazil (e.g. Halle Berry, Mariah Carey). Her traits are not Negroid, the facial shape, the jaw, the lips, the nose itself (typical Negroid noses are not just flat, they are also short vertically and small laterally, very unlike the British woman's nose), almost everything. Now, if you said she looks a dark-skinned mestizo of Latin América I'd agree with you.
As I said above, I do believe some WHG-admixed EEF might've looked reasonably dark, but dark like modern Bedouins or Saudis, not like that reconstructed woman, whose skin color looks even darker than that of most Brazilian pardos (mixed-race).
