MyTrueAncestry Mytrueancestry.com

O Neill said:
Mine makes no sense to me at all.
Im French ? lol
Gaul (23.88)
Frank (23.88)
Gaul + Frank (23.88)
1. Frankish-Gaul / Lombardy Italy (670 AD) (23.88)
2. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (24.38)
3. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) (24.68)
4. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (24.99)
5. Medieval Piedmont (670 AD) (25.12)
6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (25.2)
7. Swiss Germanic (670 AD) (25.34)
8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (25.4)
9. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) (25.91)
10. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (25.93)
11. Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (26.11)
12. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (26.35)
13. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 AD) (26.37)
14. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (26.62)
15. Celt / Hungary (590 AD) (26.75)
16. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (26.81)
17. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1200 BC) (26.99)
18. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (27.21)
19. Germano-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (27.23)
20. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (27.43)
Click to expand...
You also need to observe the distances, not just the "ranking" itself.
 
Duarte said:
This is the post #1 of this thread and what contain all explanations
Click to expand...

Stuvanè said:
The basic version is free. There are various paid upgrades that should prevent you from reloading the raw data each time and allowing you to have more detailed maps and complete lists of ancient samples
Click to expand...


Right, thanks. Dunno how i missed that. The hidden population things are quite annoying.

This is mine:

fVMknSI.jpg
 
Regio X said:
You also need to observe the distances, not just the "ranking" itself.
Click to expand...

Yes, 23.88 as your "closest" match is still a wide genetic distance. According to MyTrueAncestry, a genetic distance of 20 means those populations are merely part of your ancestral link (while a distance of 10 means this is your ancient ancestry).
 


 
Johane Derite said:
Right, thanks. Dunno how i missed that. The hidden population things are quite annoying.

This is mine:
Click to expand...

Yes, Johane, it is indeed annoying not to see the hidden populations. But to unlock these populations and see the complete archaeological map and display of 60 ancient samples with their respective numbers, we have to pay. I do not remember the value, but you can see there in the site. I believe it's USD 68 or next this.
Big hug :)
 
O Neill said:
Mine makes no sense to me at all.
Im French ? lol

Gaul (23.88)
Frank (23.88)
Gaul + Frank (23.88)

1. Frankish-Gaul / Lombardy Italy (670 AD) (23.88)
2. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (24.38)
3. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) (24.68)
4. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (24.99)
5. Medieval Piedmont (670 AD) (25.12)
6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (25.2)
7. Swiss Germanic (670 AD) (25.34)
8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (25.4)
9. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) (25.91)
10. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (25.93)
11. Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (26.11)
12. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (26.35)
13. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 AD) (26.37)
14. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (26.62)
15. Celt / Hungary (590 AD) (26.75)
16. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (26.81)
17. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1200 BC) (26.99)
18. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (27.21)
19. Germano-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (27.23)
20. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (27.43)
Click to expand...

Are you European?

Distances like that as your closest is strange. Perhaps you should ask them to re-run it.
 
Last edited:
It seems that, in my case, practically all the samples of the ancestral populations are concentrated in the center-east of Europe. Nothing above latitude "Velké Přílepy (Czechia) - 50 ° 9'37" N", nothing below latitude “Dubrovnik (Croatia) - 42 ° 38'25" N" and nothing east of longitude "Tiraspol (Moldova) - 29 ° 38'36”E “.

ErzH2vx.jpg


HTrQ5a2.jpg

This fact causes me surprise because it seems to be in line with this:
[h=2]MDLP K23b Oracle results:[/h]MDLP K23b Oracle Rev 2014 Sep 1

Xsi0ade.png
 
Last edited:
Duarte said:
It seems that, in my case, practically all the samples of the ancestral populations are concentrated in the center-east of Europe. Nothing above latitude "Velké Přílepy (Czechia) - 50 ° 9'37" N", nothing below latitude “Dubrovnik (Croatia) - 42 ° 38'25" N" and nothing east of longitude "Tiraspol (Moldova) - 29 ° 38'36”E “.

ErzH2vx.jpg


HTrQ5a2.jpg

This fact causes me surprise because it seems to be in line with this:
MDLP K23b Oracle results:

MDLP K23b Oracle Rev 2014 Sep 1

Xsi0ade.png
Click to expand...

The map is a little bit deceiving, Duarte. Those people to whom you're related in the Langobard settlements are "genetically" much further "south" than they are geographically.

The circles are just where they were found.
 
Angela said:
The map is a little bit deceiving, Duarte. Those people to whom you're related in the Langobard settlements are "genetically" much further "south" than they are geographically.

The circles are just where they were found.
Click to expand...

Thank you, Angela :)
I was so curious that I mounted this worksheet by comparing my data with the data of some of the populations that are listed in the GEDmatch MDLP K23b worksheet:


MDLP K23b Admixture Proportions - Spreadsheet
PopulationMe (Duarte)PortugueseSpanish_Galicia_IBSSpanish_Murcia_IBSSpanish_Baleares_IBSSpaniardFrench
Amerindian1.190.180.210.320.150.090.21
Ancestral_Altaic1.731.692.371.822.741.963.94
South_Central_Asian2.633.683.403.673.243.734.53
Arctic0.000.100.180.100.090.150.06
South_Indian0.680.540.400.690.390.390.33
Australoid1.080.120.170.190.120.130.19
Austronesian0.000.060.180.250.170.060.10
Caucasian20.3819.2016.8917.5523.0319.2520.16
Archaic_Human0.000.160.140.080.040.080.03
East_African0.680.700.430.750.470.320.11
East_Siberian0.000.180.150.120.140.130.06
European_Early_Farmers35.0138.3243.0544.4440.9542.9336.44
Khoisan0.000.170.190.140.130.190.06
Melano_Polynesian0.000.110.110.140.510.150.12
Archaic_African1.330.580.410.410.150.200.03
Near_East2.943.494.014.634.273.611.71
North_African5.789.115.826.433.584.551.70
Paleo_Siberian0.000.180.120.150.150.140.07
African_Pygmy1.370.110.170.230.120.150.07
South_East_Asian0.160.070.080.090.100.070.09
Subsaharian3.840.230.580.340.150.140.03
Tungus-Altaic0.000.050.120.140.120.070.07
European_Hunters_Gatherers21.1720.9820.8217.3219.1921.5129.90
 
Last edited:
Ahí va el mío.

mytrueancestry.com_c_main.jpg


mytrueancestry.com_c_main3.jpg


mytrueancestry.com_c_main.py%2B%252815%2529.png


mytrueancestry.com_c_mainWHITE.jpg


mytrueancestry.com_c_mainpoblacionesactuales.jpg

By dna Y get this result. By mitochondrial dna do not get results in this category.
mytrueancestry.com_c_mainadnY.jpg
 
Last edited:
This app is demonstrating however that we are in dire need of samples from south illyria, inland illyria, dardania, epirotes, ancient macedonians, etc. We only have myceneans, and coastal illyrians so far. Also, do we have any etruscan samples yet?
 
Carlos said:
Ahí va el mío.

mytrueancestry.com_c_main.jpg


mytrueancestry.com_c_main3.jpg


mytrueancestry.com_c_main.py%2B%252815%2529.png


mytrueancestry.com_c_mainWHITE.jpg


mytrueancestry.com_c_mainpoblacionesactuales.jpg

By dna Y get this result. By mitochondrial dna do not get results in this category.
mytrueancestry.com_c_mainadnY.jpg
Click to expand...

Hi Carlos,
Map very Similar to mine, except the blue point in northeast of England that you have and I do not have :)
 
mine, can't post pictures yet:

Scythian + Gallo-Roman (9.097)
Scythian + Gaul (12.64)
Gaul (16.02)
Scythian (16.11)
Gallo-Roman (17.44)

1. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (14.54)
2. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (15.52)
3. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) (16.02)
4. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (16.11)
5. Gallo-Roman (590 AD) (17.44)
6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (17.72)
7. Central Roman (590 AD) (18.05)
8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (18.08)
9. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1600 BC) (18.45)
10. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (18.45)
11. Medieval Tyrolian (670 AD) (18.69)
12. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (18.88)
13. Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (19.1)
14. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (19.57)
15. Medieval Piedmont (670 AD) (19.76)
16. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (19.78)
17. Scythian Moldova (300 BC) (19.86)
18. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (20.09)
19. Central Roman (670 AD) (20.36)
20. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (20.42)

1. Bosnian (7.196)
2. Serbian (9.557)
3. Macedonian (10.13)
4. Romanian (10.47)
 
^^
Duarte
Sí, lo había visto. Qué alegría, estamos muy cerca, aunque el Océano Atlántico ha separado nuestros destinos para siempre, el nuestro es imposible.

mytrueancestry.com_c_mainautosomal.py%2B%25286%2529.png
 
Last edited:
Johane Derite said:
This app is demonstrating however that we are in dire need of samples from south illyria, inland illyria, dardania, epirotes, ancient macedonians, etc. We only have myceneans, and coastal illyrians so far. Also, do we have any etruscan samples yet?
Click to expand...

Hi Johane,
I do not know how to respond your question about the Etruscan samples because MyTrueAncestry only relate the samples that are related to you (match with you). For example, Carlos exhibited the 60 samples that are relate to him.
The ones that are related to me are the following:
f9MUzSe.png

ijW6bgg.png

bzkdzLY.png


In this topic you will may see that there are tests of Britons and descendants of Britons and you will can see that the ancestral samples displayed to them are others.

Big Hug :)
 
I got the Footman features; now my 20 first Archeological matches are revealed:

Archeogenetic matches.jpg

Does it make sense? Is it possible that my data was corrupted on upload? Where can I find more info on this "Scythian Moldova (270 BC)" sample?
 
Carlos said:
^^
Duarte
Yes, I had seen it. What a joy, we are very close, although the Atlantic Ocean has separated our destinies forever, ours is impossible.

mytrueancestry.com_c_mainautosomal.py%2B%25286%2529.png


I think this program does everything for me. And since I do not obtain data from all of Spain with my mitochondrial DNA, I have tried even in the south-west of France and there is no data. Later I will try to see what happens.


Here I have got closer to 3 with Valencia, notice that years ago I was told by an expert in genealogy that my paternal surname being from Malaga I saw that it could come from a Valencian settler and that the surname had become Castilianized, a possibility.
Click to expand...

I did not know this functionality Carlos. Very cool :)

voloh said:
mine, can't post pictures yet:

Scythian + Gallo-Roman (9.097)
Scythian + Gaul (12.64)
Gaul (16.02)
Scythian (16.11)
Gallo-Roman (17.44)

1. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (14.54)
2. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (15.52)
3. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) (16.02)
4. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (16.11)
5. Gallo-Roman (590 AD) (17.44)
6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (17.72)
7. Central Roman (590 AD) (18.05)
8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (18.08)
9. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1600 BC) (18.45)
10. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (18.45)
11. Medieval Tyrolian (670 AD) (18.69)
12. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (18.88)
13. Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (19.1)
14. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (19.57)
15. Medieval Piedmont (670 AD) (19.76)
16. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (19.78)
17. Scythian Moldova (300 BC) (19.86)
18. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (20.09)
19. Central Roman (670 AD) (20.36)
20. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (20.42)

1. Bosnian (7.196)
2. Serbian (9.557)
3. Macedonian (10.13)
4. Romanian (10.47)
Click to expand...

Cool results voloh :)
 
HYGILI4K said:
I got the Footman features; now my 20 first Archeological matches are revealed:

View attachment 10952

Does it make sense? Is it possible that my data was corrupted on upload? Where can I find more info on this "Scythian Moldova (270 BC)" sample?
Click to expand...

Yes. This make sense for Iberians.
See below.
My data:
i8nrvj6.png

fxqr6JI.png

LZm2CFJ.png

zNodyGd.png

J2UaVAC.png

f9MUzSe.png
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

This thread has been viewed 1261486 times.

Back
Top