Distance to: | I9041_Bronze_Age_Mycenaean_Galatas_Apatheia_Peloponnese |
---|
10.43492693 | EBA_Helladic_Manika:Mik15 |
12.06881519 | EBA_Minoan_Petrasta08 |
12.07672555 | EBA_Cyclade_Koufanisi:Kou01 |
12.23097707 | EBA_Cyclade_Koufanisi:Kou03 |
17.61742603 | MBA_Helladic_Logkas:Log02 |
25.89092505 | MBA_Helladic_Logkas:Log04 |
Distance to: | I9033_Bronze_Age_Mycenaean_Peristeria_Tryfilia_Peloponnese |
---|
10.88073067 | EBA_Helladic_Manika:Mik15 |
16.40191147 | EBA_Cyclade_Koufanisi:Kou01 |
16.44074512 | EBA_Minoan_Petrasta08 |
16.95989092 | MBA_Helladic_Logkas:Log02 |
17.21235022 | EBA_Cyclade_Koufanisi:Kou03 |
24.17193000 | MBA_Helladic_Logkas:Log04 |
Distance to: | I9010_Bronze_Age_Mycenaean_Galatas_Apatheia_Peloponnese |
---|
8.35844483 | EBA_Helladic_Manika:Mik15 |
12.78122842 | EBA_Minoan_Petrasta08 |
13.50211835 | EBA_Cyclade_Koufanisi:Kou01 |
15.44432906 | EBA_Cyclade_Koufanisi:Kou03 |
18.71543748 | MBA_Helladic_Logkas:Log02 |
27.25182012 | MBA_Helladic_Logkas:Log04 |
Distance to: | I9006_Bronze_Age_Mycenaean_Agia_Kyriaki_Salamis |
---|
6.99439776 | EBA_Cyclade_Koufanisi:Kou03 |
8.32957982 | EBA_Cyclade_Koufanisi:Kou01 |
9.51363758 | EBA_Minoan_Petrasta08 |
12.59342289 | EBA_Helladic_Manika:Mik15 |
23.57097580 | MBA_Helladic_Logkas:Log02 |
31.43262954 | MBA_Helladic_Logkas:Log04
|
It's good that it's finally settled that "
Despite their distinct cultures, the EBA Helladic, Cycladic, and Minoan genomes resemble one another in all analyses."
Once again, the archaeologists got it right:
"ADMIXTURE results indicate that the EBA Aegean population consists mostly of an ancestry component shared with Neolithic Aegeans (accounting for >65%), whereas most of the remaining ancestry can be assigned to Iran Neolithic/Caucasus HG-related populations (17%–27%) (Figure 3). These results were replicated with qpWave/qpAdm (STAR Methods) using Dataset I (Tables 3 and S3). When considering early Neolithic populations and HG populations as potential sources, EBA individuals were in general found to be consistent with the majority of their ancestry deriving from populations related to Anatolia_N (∼69%–84%) (Table 3). This suggests that the people behind the Neolithic to BA transition largely had ancestors from the preceding Aegean farmers, in line with archaeological theories for the EBA transformation (Dickinson, 2016; Renfrew, 1972; Tsountas and Manatt, 1897)"
[FONT=NexusSerif, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, STIXGeneral, Cambria Math, Lucida Sans Unicode, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI Symbol, Arial Unicode MS, serif]
So, all the achievements of the Early Bronze Age owed NOTHING to the steppe, as I've said innumerable times.[/FONT]
[FONT=NexusSerif, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, STIXGeneral, Cambria Math, Lucida Sans Unicode, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI Symbol, Arial Unicode MS, serif]
Interesting that in f3 the EBA Greeks are closest to Sardinians, and then, variably, Basque/North Italian and Pais Vasco before, variably, Albanians and Greeks, and in one case Romanians.[/FONT]
[FONT=NexusSerif, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, STIXGeneral, Cambria Math, Lucida Sans Unicode, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI Symbol, Arial Unicode MS, serif]
Also interesting that Basques are closer to Anatolian Bronze Age than the North Italians.[/FONT]
[FONT=NexusSerif, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, STIXGeneral, Cambria Math, Lucida Sans Unicode, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI Symbol, Arial Unicode MS, serif]
Log 4 and Log2 are quite different, as we can see from our own results, with Log 4 being closest to Scots and Lithuanians, and Log 2 being closest to Basques and Pais Vasco. Clearly that admixture probably didn't last too long.[/FONT]
[FONT=NexusSerif, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, STIXGeneral, Cambria Math, Lucida Sans Unicode, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI Symbol, Arial Unicode MS, serif]
Of course, they didn't include all the regional Italian samples.[/FONT]
[FONT=NexusSerif, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, STIXGeneral, Cambria Math, Lucida Sans Unicode, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI Symbol, Arial Unicode MS, serif]
Table 3 seems to indicate that Log 2 is about 39% MLBA steppe and 61% Kou 1, or 44% Europe LNBA plus the rest Kou 1. [/FONT]
[FONT=NexusSerif, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, STIXGeneral, Cambria Math, Lucida Sans Unicode, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI Symbol, Arial Unicode MS, serif]
Log 4 is more steppe heavy, up to 56%.[/FONT]
[FONT=NexusSerif, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, STIXGeneral, Cambria Math, Lucida Sans Unicode, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI Symbol, Arial Unicode MS, serif]
Their Mycenean figures are 21% and 36% Log 4. (Don't know why it was Log 4 types which made it to the Peloponnese. ) So, using their analysis, that would be 56% of 21 or 56% of 36, or 11.8 and 20%, which is generally in line with what Lazaridis found.
[/FONT]I'm disappointed that they seem to think because modern Greeks in a PCA land closer to Log 2 and Log 4 that there's been continuity since that time. They should know better.