Gaska, you have not changed! The same as on Eurogenes, if I don't mistake.
Villabruna seems rather an eastern variant of WHG in Europe (very roughly said, I confess), his Y-haplo is a newcomer compared to Y-I there and Y-R and Y-R1 are surely not native of Atlantic coasts of Europe or Basque country, for me at least.
I don't know who you are, but obviously I am not going to change my opinion about Villabruna because to date it is the oldest R1b found both in Asia and Europe. Do you know where exactly the mutation that gave rise to R1b occurred? Villabruna is dated at 12.000 BC. There are 10,000 years of difference between R* Malta Boy and Villabruna. The solution is to analyze more Gravettian genomes (mainland Europe), there we will find the first R1* and R1b*
I can't understand everyone's obsession with the steppes, even R1b-V88 is older in the Balkans than in Dereivka. Soon the Volosovo results will be published and you will see that all Russian R1b are clearly WHGS without steppe ancestry, like those found in the Baltic countries, the Balkans, Italy, France and Norway. So many people have been wasting their time for many years talking about the steppes, the longer they take to recognize it the bigger the ridicule they will make. It has not been enough with the failure of the Yamnaya culture and now they pretend to link R1b-L51/P312 with the CWC.
Tell Davidski that sooner or later he will have to bow his head and accept defeat. He has been talking nonsense for too long now that is only accepted by a few bootlickers who continue to participate in his blog and anthrogenica.
And about the Basques don't worry, we already know enough to clearly understand our genetic history.