Carmi, Xue paper on "The Time and Place of European Gene Flow into Ashkenazi Jews"

What do the latest data say about Jewish Y-DNA - how much of it is of ME and how much of EU origin?

AJs are mostly E3b (M34), J2, J1 or R1a/b (of Iranic or Egyptian source). Then again, J2 is the most common paternal lineage in Crete, pretty sure E3b isn't far behind.
 
AJs are mostly E3b (M34), J2, J1 or R1a/b (of Iranic or Egyptian source). Then again, J2 is the most common paternal lineage in Crete, pretty sure E3b isn't far behind.

I believe there are marked differences on haplogroup admixture with different Jewish groups in different parts of the world. Probably The Ashkenazim and Sephardi groups are the best studied which shows a considerable European admixture. I am not sure if any studies were conducted on the Jews of the Middle east especially those who never left the area and never formed part of any diaspora which is Israel today. Probably they would be the most authentic (dna wise).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_of_Jewish_origins
 
Jews have their own specific MENA/Levantine subclaces of haplogroups like J2, J1 or E-M34, which are non existent among ethnic Europeans.If Jews have mixed with Europeans, the hybrid offspring was absorbed in the Jewish genepool, because Botigue et al failed to find significan (above 0.1%) Jewish ancestry in any European ethnic group.
 
Jews have their own specific MENA/Levantine subclaces of haplogroups like J2, J1 or E-M34, which are non existent among ethnic Europeans.If Jews have mixed with Europeans, the hybrid offspring was absorbed in the Jewish genepool, because Botigue et al failed to find significan (above 0.1%) Jewish ancestry in any European ethnic group.
J2 is quite common in southeastern Europe and the Greek isles, it's the most common paternal lineage in Crete. J1 and E-M34 aren't nonexistent in these regions either.
 
Jews have their own specific MENA/Levantine subclaces of haplogroups like J2, J1 or E-M34, which are non existent among ethnic Europeans.If Jews have mixed with Europeans, the hybrid offspring was absorbed in the Jewish genepool, because Botigue et al failed to find significan (above 0.1%) Jewish ancestry in any European ethnic group.

Joe Doe is correct. Malta has around 22% Sicily 23% Central Italy 23% South Italy 21.5% Greece 23% and Albania 19.5% Cyprus 37% and Crete 34% besides high percentages in Lebanon and other Countries in the near east. So J2 is not just a Jewish Marker. On the other hand I guess you are talking about the PF4888 subclade

Haplogroup-J2.jpg
 
J2 is quite common in southeastern Europe and the Greek isles, it's the most common paternal lineage in Crete. J1 and E-M34 aren't nonexistent in these regions either.

Talking about J2 is like talking about R1b and R1a. Jews have their own specific Levantine like subclades like J2a1-PF4888, E-L791 or E-M84 which are non existent in ethnic Europeans.
 
There is a theory about Mesopotamian origin of the Hebrews - who later migrated to the Levant and to Caanan. According to this theory the Hebrews came to their ulimate homeland during the so called 3rd wave of Semitic migrations, arriving there, absorbing and mixing with previous Semite-speakers who had migrated or emerged there before.

The Biblical story which says that Abraham was born in the city of Ur is of course a legend and we don't know whether it is true or not (or whether that Abraham really existed or not), but it may reflect the eastern origin of the Hebrews. There are also written sources which seem to support Mesopotamian origins of the Hebrews. One of them mentions the Habir peoples (could they be Hebrews? most probably yes) living in Mesopotamia, near the city of Ur, ca. 2750 - 2600 BC. Later sources mention such names like Habiri and Ibrim (could both or at least one of these names be Hebrews? most likely yes) migrating to Caanan during the 15th century BC, as part of the 3rd wave of Semitic migrations.

Then we have Egyptian sources mentioning some people called the Hebiri / Habiru (they could be Hebrews) in Egypt during the 13th and the 12th centuries BC. There is little or no archaeological evidence of their presence, but maybe that's because they were a relatively small group (perhaps no more than 35,000) in a country which had a few million inhabitants. Of course they were not building pyramids, because their presence in Egypt took place centuries after the end of "pyramid-building movement" (according to the link posted below, the last of Egyptian pyramids were constructed in the 18th century BC - almost 500 years before the beginning of hypothetical Hebrew presence in Egypt):

http://www.ancientegypt.co.uk/time/explore/pyr.html

On the number of Hebrews in Egypt (most probably no more than 35,000):

http://www.accuracyingenesis.com/exodus_population.html


On the population of Egypt at that time (between 3 million and 5 million people):

http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/people/

http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/oriindex.htm

Pop_Egy.png


After settling in Canaan, the Hebrews mixed with local peoples - other Semitic tribes who had been there before them (the Hebrews first visited Palestine around 3500 years ago, and ~3300 years ago they maybe went to Egypt, just to come back to Palestine between some 3100 to 3050 years ago).

The Bible gives examples of ethnic mixing - grandmother of King David was an ethnic Moabite. So when Jews emerged as a true nation (and they emerged as such perhaps only in their own kingdom* - established in year 1020 BC), they were no longer descendants of just the Hebrews alone. They also assimilated or absorbed many other Semitic tribes.

*Though already before establishing a kingdom (1020 BC), Jews had been a loosely united tribal union. It consisted of many tribes, both with Hebrew and other Semitic, Non-Hebrew background:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Judges#Main_text

Among those tribes absorbed by the Hebrews - and thus taking part in the ethnogenesis of the Israelites / Jews - were for example the Kenites, the Rechabites, the Kenisites, etc. They also intermarried with the Edomites, the Moabites, etc. Perhaps some ethnic Egyptians also melted into Jewish communities, if the story about Hebrew presence in Egypt is true. And Moses even had an Ethiopian wife (allegedly). Only centuries later Jewish laws concerning marriages of Jews with Non-Jews became much more restricted, but that still did not stop the influx of new blood when Gentiles converted to Judaism (like apparently many Ancient Greeks did during Hellenistic and Roman times). And already before the Roman subjugation of the Hasmonean Kingdom, Jews had been the result of a mix of many tribes.

So ethnogenesis of Jews "proper", or the Israelites, took place in Canaan, even though one of major parts of their ancestors - the Hebrews - might have migrated there from the east. As for the Hebrew language - it belongs to Canaanite subdivision of Semitic, which included for example Hebrew and Phoenician. Canaanite languages - together with Aramaic, Ugaritic and Amorite subdivisions - were parts of Northwest Semitic languages, which were parts of Central Semitic languages. Amorites had migrated to Western Levant before the Hebrews and founderd the Kingdom of Yamhad:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamhad

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_people#Semitic-speaking_peoples

As for Judaism in its modern form, as a monotheistic religion - Judaism evolved from Canaanite religion, but at the beginning they most probably worshipped many gods. It evolved from Polytheism through Monolatrism (recognizing the existence of many gods but believing that only one is the chosen god worth worshipping) to Monotheism.

Angela said:
the principal components analysis suggested a common ancestry of Samaritan and Jewish patrilineages.

Indeed the Samaritans were part of the same ethnic group as the Jews - they were both ethnic Israelites, but the Samaritans had their own non-orthodox sect of Judaism. Apart from the Israelites (including Jews and Samaritans), also other ethnic groups inhabited the area of modern Israel and Palestine in Ancient times - including the Philistines, who could be ancestors of modern Palestinian Arabs (apart of course from "original Arabic" and other admixtures into them):

Area with ethnic Jewish / Israelite majority in Ancient Caanan (light green):

ancient%20israel.jpg


Israelite religious sites in Caanan / Palestine during the early period of Roman rule:

Synagogi.png


The 2nd map is based on archaeological findings and written sources, according to The Cambridge History of Judaism.

============================

Jewish people have a tragic, but great and very ancient history. As this study shows they also share the heritage of Ancient Greeks and Romans as they are partially (35%) descended from those of them who converted to Judaism.
 
Talking about J2 is like talking about R1b and R1a. Jews have their own specific Levantine like subclades like J2a1-PF4888, E-L791 or E-M84 which are non existent in ethnic Europeans.

Yes, but what's the TMRCA of those "Jewish" clades, by which I suppose we mean "Ashkenazi" clades? They're probably very young, dating to around the time of the bottleneck. What if we go back 1,000 years from that time, to the Imperial Age or even to the Hellenistic era? (Of course, the Ashkenazim didn't exist as a separate group at that point.) What are the immediate upstream claims of the "Ashkenazi" ones? How many of today's non-Jewish Europeans carry them?

What J2a and E lines do the Sephardim carry? Are they exactly the same?
 
Exodus 1:11 --
King James Version: "So they appointed taskmasters over them to afflict them with hard labor. And they built for Pharaoh storage cities, Pithom and Raamses."

New International Version: "So they put slave masters over them to oppress them with forced labor, and they built Pithom and Rameses as store cities for Pharaoh."

That Pithom and Rameses could be a bit like Buda and Pest, originally two nearby cities, later becoming one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG8RxU9tbiw


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP-0KvY0ri4


The Hebrews were also apparently getting assimilated by the Egyptians:

http://www.spurgeongems.org/vols43-45/chs2631.pdf

They were content to be in Egypt and they were quite willing to be "Egyptianized." To a large degree, they began to adopt the superstitions, idolatries and iniquities of Egypt. And these things clung to them, in later years, to such a terrible extent that we can easily imagine that their heart must have turned aside very much towards the sins of Egypt. Yet, all the while, God was resolved to bring them out of that evil connection. They must be a separated people—they could not be Egyptians, nor yet live permanently like Egyptians, for Jehovah had chosen them for Himself, and He meant to make an abiding difference between Israel and Egypt.

Originally (when they entered Egypt), they were shepherds, only later they were put to work on construction:

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis 47&version=NIV

(...) Joseph went and told Pharaoh, “My father and brothers, with their flocks and herds and everything they own, have come from the land of Canaan and are now in Goshen.” 2 He chose five of his brothers and presented them before Pharaoh.

3 Pharaoh asked the brothers, “What is your occupation?”

“Your servants are shepherds,” they replied to Pharaoh, “just as our fathers were.” 4 They also said to him, “We have come to live here for a while, because the famine is severe in Canaan and your servants’ flocks have no pasture. So now, please let your servants settle in Goshen.”

5 Pharaoh said to Joseph, “Your father and your brothers have come to you, 6 and the land of Egypt is before you; settle your father and your brothers in the best part of the land. Let them live in Goshen. And if you know of any among them with special ability, put them in charge of my own livestock.” (...)

800px-Nebamun-ViewingTheProduceOfTheEstates-3.JPG
 
In this case the bible is not a reliable source for history for many reasons, mainly that its impossible to have a million Jews crossing to the Sinai to the promised land with absolutely no trace. There should be traces of these people if the crossing really happened but till this day there is none and it has been well scanned.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Egypt#Ancient_times
 
Talking about J2 is like talking about R1b and R1a. Jews have their own specific Levantine like subclades like J2a1-PF4888, E-L791 or E-M84 which are non existent in ethnic Europeans.

I dont think these subclades are reserved only to Jews but to other middle eastern peoples.
 
"A million Jews"? What million? This article explains that there were at the most 35,000 of them:

http://www.accuracyingenesis.com/exodus_population.html

Something was confused in translation if there are editions which say about one million.

Numbers 1:46 gives a more precise total of 603,550 men aged 20 and up.[17] The 600,000, plus wives, children, the elderly, and the "mixed multitude" of non-Israelites would have numbered some 2 million people,[18]compared with an entire Egyptian population in 1250 BCE of around 3 to 3.5 million.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus#Numbers_and_logistics

and no traces on the way of crossing? Charcol for cooking? deceased bodies? human waste?....it is known to have already been a dessert.
 
There is a theory about Mesopotamian origin of the Hebrews - who later migrated to the Levant and to Caanan. According to this theory the Hebrews came to their ulimate homeland during the so called 3rd wave of Semitic migrations, arriving there, absorbing and mixing with previous Semite-speakers who had migrated or emerged there before.

The Biblical story which says that Abraham was born in the city of Ur is of course a legend and we don't know whether it is true or not (or whether that Abraham really existed or not), but it may reflect the eastern origin of the Hebrews. There are also written sources which seem to support Mesopotamian origins of the Hebrews. One of them mentions the Habir peoples (could they be Hebrews? most probably yes) living in Mesopotamia, near the city of Ur, ca. 2750 - 2600 BC. Later sources mention such names like Habiri and Ibrim (could both or at least one of these names be Hebrews? most likely yes) migrating to Caanan during the 15th century BC, as part of the 3rd wave of Semitic migrations.

Then we have Egyptian sources mentioning some people called the Hebiri / Habiru (they could be Hebrews) in Egypt during the 13th and the 12th centuries BC. There is little or no archaeological evidence of their presence, but maybe that's because they were a relatively small group (perhaps no more than 35,000) in a country which had a few million inhabitants. Of course they were not building pyramids, because their presence in Egypt took place centuries after the end of "pyramid-building movement" (according to the link posted below, the last of Egyptian pyramids were constructed in the 18th century BC - almost 500 years before the beginning of hypothetical Hebrew presence in Egypt):

http://www.ancientegypt.co.uk/time/explore/pyr.html

On the number of Hebrews in Egypt (most probably no more than 35,000):

http://www.accuracyingenesis.com/exodus_population.html


On the population of Egypt at that time (between 3 million and 5 million people):

http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/people/

http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/oriindex.htm

Pop_Egy.png


After settling in Canaan, the Hebrews mixed with local peoples - other Semitic tribes who had been there before them (the Hebrews first visited Palestine around 3500 years ago, and ~3300 years ago they maybe went to Egypt, just to come back to Palestine between some 3100 to 3050 years ago).

The Bible gives examples of ethnic mixing - grandmother of King David was an ethnic Moabite. So when Jews emerged as a true nation (and they emerged as such perhaps only in their own kingdom* - established in year 1020 BC), they were no longer descendants of just the Hebrews alone. They also assimilated or absorbed many other Semitic tribes.

*Though already before establishing a kingdom (1020 BC), Jews had been a loosely united tribal union. It consisted of many tribes, both with Hebrew and other Semitic, Non-Hebrew background:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Judges#Main_text

Among those tribes absorbed by the Hebrews - and thus taking part in the ethnogenesis of the Israelites / Jews - were for example the Kenites, the Rechabites, the Kenisites, etc. They also intermarried with the Edomites, the Moabites, etc. Perhaps some ethnic Egyptians also melted into Jewish communities, if the story about Hebrew presence in Egypt is true. And Moses even had an Ethiopian wife (allegedly). Only centuries later Jewish laws concerning marriages of Jews with Non-Jews became much more restricted, but that still did not stop the influx of new blood when Gentiles converted to Judaism (like apparently many Ancient Greeks did during Hellenistic and Roman times). And already before the Roman subjugation of the Hasmonean Kingdom, Jews had been the result of a mix of many tribes.

So ethnogenesis of Jews "proper", or the Israelites, took place in Canaan, even though one of major parts of their ancestors - the Hebrews - might have migrated there from the east. As for the Hebrew language - it belongs to Canaanite subdivision of Semitic, which included for example Hebrew and Phoenician. Canaanite languages - together with Aramaic, Ugaritic and Amorite subdivisions - were parts of Northwest Semitic languages, which were parts of Central Semitic languages. Amorites had migrated to Western Levant before the Hebrews and founderd the Kingdom of Yamhad:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamhad

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_people#Semitic-speaking_peoples

As for Judaism in its modern form, as a monotheistic religion - Judaism evolved from Canaanite religion, but at the beginning they most probably worshipped many gods. It evolved from Polytheism through Monolatrism (recognizing the existence of many gods but believing that only one is the chosen god worth worshipping) to Monotheism.



Indeed the Samaritans were part of the same ethnic group as the Jews - they were both ethnic Israelites, but the Samaritans had their own non-orthodox sect of Judaism. Apart from the Israelites (including Jews and Samaritans), also other ethnic groups inhabited the area of modern Israel and Palestine in Ancient times - including the Philistines, who could be ancestors of modern Palestinian Arabs (apart of course from "original Arabic" and other admixtures into them):

Area with ethnic Jewish / Israelite majority in Ancient Caanan (light green):

ancient%20israel.jpg


Israelite religious sites in Caanan / Palestine during the early period of Roman rule:

Synagogi.png


The 2nd map is based on archaeological findings and written sources, according to The Cambridge History of Judaism.

============================

Jewish people have a tragic, but great and very ancient history. As this study shows they also share the heritage of Ancient Greeks and Romans as they are partially (35%) descended from those of them who converted to Judaism.

I agree with this.
 

This thread has been viewed 24891 times.

Back
Top