The Genetic Prehistory of the Baltic Sea Region

Another point of view, from Razib Khan:
https://www.gnxp.com/WordPress/2018...baltic/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Of course, sampling is imperfect, and perhaps they’ve missed pockets of ancient Finnic peoples. But the most thorough analysis of Mesolithic hunter-gatherers in Scandinavian does not pick them up either, Population genomics of Mesolithic Scandinavia: Investigating early postglacial migration routes and high-latitude adaptation. Populations, such as the Comb Ceramic Culture, which have been identified as possible ancestors of the modern Finnic culture and ethnicity, lack the distinctive Siberian-like component.

At the SMBE 2017, I saw a poster which had results that were sampled from Finland proper, and distinctive ancestry of Siberian-like peoples was present in an individual who lived after 500 AD. This means that in all likelihood the circumpolar Siberian population which introduced this new element into the East Baltic arrived in the period between 500 BC and 500 AD."

"I will add when I run Treemix Finns get the Siberian gene flow you’d expect. But the Lithuanians get something from the Finns. Since the Lithuanians have appreciable levels of N1c, that is not entirely surprising to me (the basal flow from the Yakut/European region to Belorussians may be more CHG/ANE).

Additionally, I will note that on a f-3 test Lithuanians have nearly as high a z-score (absolute) as Swedes (i.e., Finn; Swede/Lithuanian, Yakut), indicating that the predominant Northern European ancestry isn’t necessarily Scandinavian, as much as something between Lithuanian-like and Swedish-like (on Admixture tests the Finns do seem to have less EEF than Swedes, and Lithuanians probably the least of all among non-Finn peoples)."
 
Another point of view, from Razib Khan:
https://www.gnxp.com/WordPress/2018...baltic/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Of course, sampling is imperfect, and perhaps they’ve missed pockets of ancient Finnic peoples. But the most thorough analysis of Mesolithic hunter-gatherers in Scandinavian does not pick them up either, Population genomics of Mesolithic Scandinavia: Investigating early postglacial migration routes and high-latitude adaptation. Populations, such as the Comb Ceramic Culture, which have been identified as possible ancestors of the modern Finnic culture and ethnicity, lack the distinctive Siberian-like component.

At the SMBE 2017, I saw a poster which had results that were sampled from Finland proper, and distinctive ancestry of Siberian-like peoples was present in an individual who lived after 500 AD. This means that in all likelihood the circumpolar Siberian population which introduced this new element into the East Baltic arrived in the period between 500 BC and 500 AD."

"I will add when I run Treemix Finns get the Siberian gene flow you’d expect. But the Lithuanians get something from the Finns. Since the Lithuanians have appreciable levels of N1c, that is not entirely surprising to me (the basal flow from the Yakut/European region to Belorussians may be more CHG/ANE).

Additionally, I will note that on a f-3 test Lithuanians have nearly as high a z-score (absolute) as Swedes (i.e., Finn; Swede/Lithuanian, Yakut), indicating that the predominant Northern European ancestry isn’t necessarily Scandinavian, as much as something between Lithuanian-like and Swedish-like (on Admixture tests the Finns do seem to have less EEF than Swedes, and Lithuanians probably the least of all among non-Finn peoples)."

If I recall well, Roman writers reported about Finnic HG, who didn't practice farming and had no cattle.
They must have been the Uralic N1c.
 
None of male Bronze Age individuals from this study carry haplogroup N and the authors concluded that haplogroup N in north-eastern Europe arrived there after 500 calBCE. It's interesting to observe that Uralic-speaking populations with haplogroup N arrived from Siberia later than the hunter-gatherer population with R1a and they were non-existent during the Bronze Age in Northern Europe.

What's the prove that populations with haplogroup N were Uralic-speaking?
 
"Perhaps the Siberian-like people did not introduce Finnic languages into the Baltic."
https://www.gnxp.com/WordPress/2018...baltic/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter


I think you missed the following sentence:

"Addendum: I should note here that the genetics is getting clearer, but I have no great insight into the ethno-linguistic aspect. Perhaps the Siberian-like people did not introduce Finnic languages into the Baltic. Perhaps that was someone else. But I doubt it."

I don't mean to imply that he's an expert in that particular aspect of the question, of course.
 
Has this article been posted yet?

See:
https://phys.org/news/2018-01-northern-european-population-history-revealed.html#jCp

"Surprisingly, the results of the current study show that Mesolithic hunter-gatherers from Lithuania appear very similar to their Western neighbors, despite their geographic proximity to Russia. The ancestry of contemporary Scandinavian hunter-gatherers, on the other hand, was comprised from both Western and Eastern Hunter-Gatherers."

"
In the Eastern Baltic, the inhabitants relied solely on hunting, gathering and fishing for another 1000 years. Although some have argued that the use of the new subsistence strategy was a local development by foragers, possibly adopting the practices of their farming neighbors, the genetic evidence uncovered in the present study tells a different story.
The earliest farmers in Sweden are not descended from Mesolithic Scandinavians, but show a genetic profile similar to that of Central European agriculturalists. Thus it appears that Central Europeans migrated to Scandinavia and brought farming technology with them."

"Similarly, a near-total genetic turnover is seen in the Eastern Baltic with the advent of large-scale agro-pastoralism. While they did not mix genetically with Central European or Scandinavian farmers, beginning around 2,900 BCE the individuals in the Eastern Baltic derive large parts of their ancestry from nomadic pastoralists of the Pontic-Caspian steppe.

"Interestingly, we find an increase of local Eastern Baltic hunter-gatherer ancestry in this population at the onset of the Bronze Age," states Alissa Mittnik of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, lead author of the study. "The local population was not completely replaced but coexisted and eventually mixed with the newcomers."
Neat map:
northerneuro.jpg



Interestingly enough, the Popovo sample is J1. That makes two, as Oleni Ostrov was also J1. Assuming that they have no CHG or Basal Eurasian, does that mean that J1 was originally part of the UHG strand in the Middle East?
 
[/SIZE]Interestingly enough, the Popovo sample is J1. That makes two, as Oleni Ostrov was also J1. Assuming that they have no CHG or Basal Eurasian, does that mean that J1 was originally part of the UHG strand in the Middle East?

The Karelia HG J1 would be J1-Y6304 which split from the Satsurblia branch 14,3 ka and with descendants in Finland and Columbia.
Popovo 2 looks more like pré-J1 (split > 18.5 ka) - as far as the readings are accurate

anyway, both early splits from the J1 branch

https://genetiker.wordpress.com/y-snp-calls-for-i0211/
https://www.yfull.com/tree/J1/
https://genetiker.wordpress.com/y-snp-calls-for-popovo-2/
 
The Karelia HG J1 would be J1-Y6304 which split from the Satsurblia branch 14,3 ka and with descendants in Finland and Columbia.
Popovo 2 looks more like pré-J1 (split > 18.5 ka) - as far as the readings are accurate
anyway, both early splits from the J1 branch
https://genetiker.wordpress.com/y-snp-calls-for-i0211/
https://www.yfull.com/tree/J1/
https://genetiker.wordpress.com/y-snp-calls-for-popovo-2/
So this is really a new J1 not the old one with R1a ? and what do you mean by Columbia ? Now the question is are those J1 came through Caucasus or around the Caspian. Anyway intersting stuff.
 
there is no evidence of slav at that time in CWC........it could also be just germanic and baltic
Ah yes, anything but Slavic.
That's just a typical fantasy on your part. CWC couldn't be Germanic for a simple reason, Germanic languages belong to a Centum family. CWC were ancestors of Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian. Deal with it. Unless of course, we're still playing with Indo-Germanic fairy tales.
 
Ah yes, anything but Slavic.
That's just a typical fantasy on your part. CWC couldn't be Germanic for a simple reason, Germanic languages belong to a Centum family. CWC were ancestors of Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian. Deal with it. Unless of course, we're still playing with Indo-Germanic fairy tales.

To be fair CWC couldn't possibly have been Germanic, Slavic or anything. These branches are too late for that. But, yes, probaly CWC spoke the LPIE dialect from which Balto-Slavic, Indo-Iranian and perhaps even also Daco-Thracian came to be many centuries and even milennia later. In my opinion, Germanic is a much trickier thing and it looks related (in isoglosses) both to Balto-Slavic and Italo-Celtic. Considering that genetically the core area of Proto-Germanic has both R1b and R1a in significant percentages, as well as I1, and is very close to the CWC territory, my hypothesis is that Germanic arose from the imposition of a Centum Bell Beaker language onto a former CWC-derived language or maybe just a Centum Bell Beaker language under direct and long influence from neighbnoring CWC languages.
 
R1a-CTS1211 is ca. 37% to 38,5% of all Polish R1a, and R1a is ca. half of all Polish Y-DNA.

Two ancient samples of CTS1211 have just been published, and they are from Baltic states:

Lithuania, Spiginas 2, 2130-1750 BC, Baltic_EBA, R1a-Z280>CTS1211+

Latvia, Kivutkalns 19, 730-400 BC, Baltic_LBA, R1a-Z280>CTS1211>YP1034>Y13467+

Could ancestors of ca. 1/5 of Polish men originate from Bronze Age Latvia and Lithuania?
 
Two estimates of percentages of R1a subgroups in Poland (CTS1211 is >1/3 of Polish R1a):

1. My estimate (I calculated it from FTDNA Projects):

R1a-M459 - 100,00% (sample size 1208), including:

---- M459* - 0,17% (2)
---- M198 - 99,83% (1206)
-------- M198* - 0,17% (2)
-------- L664 - 0,33% (4)

-------- Z645 - 99,34% (1200)
------------ Z93 - 2,73% (33)
------------ Z283 - 96,61% (1167)
---------------- Z283* - 0,91% (11)
---------------- Z284 - 0,41% (5)

---------------- M458 - 46,03% (556), including:
-------------------- L260 - 24,83% (300)
-------------------- CTS11962 - 20,45% (247)
-------------------- other M458 - 0,75% (9)

---------------- Z280 - 49,25% (595), including:
-------------------- CTS1211 - 38,49% (465)
------------------------ CTS3402 - 30,05% (363)
------------------------ other CTS1211 - 8,44% (102)
-------------------- Z92 - 9,85% (119)
-------------------- other Z280 - 0,91% (11)

2. Estimates of Peter Gwozdz from his website:
(but this includes Polish Jews with R1a-Y2619)

http://www.gwozdz.org/Results.html

R1a-M459 - 100,00% of Polish R1a, including:

Z93 - 5,25%
--- Y2619 - 3,03% - typical for Jews CTS6>Y2619 - https://www.yfull.com/tree/R-CTS6/
--- other Z93 - 2,22%

M458 - 46,87% of Polish R1a, including:
---- L260 - 29,70%
-------- YP254 - 19,60%
------------ Y4135 - 3,43%
------------ YP414 - 8,48%
---------------- YP610 - 5,66%
---------------- YP589 - 2,83%
------------ Y2905 - 7,07%
---------------- YP1364 - 3,43%
---------------- other Y2905 - 3,64%
------------ other YP254 - 0,62%
-------- YP654 - 4,85%
-------- other L260 - 5,25%
---- CTS11962 - 16,57%
-------- L1029 - 12,53%
------------ YP593 - 3,84%
------------ YP444 - 2,42%
------------ other L1029 - 6,27%
-------- YP515 - 4,04%
---- other M458 - 0,60%

Z280 - 46,87% of Polish R1a, including:
---- CTS1211 - 37,37%
-------- CTS3402 - 32,12%
------------ Y33 - 14,34%
---------------- Y2902 - 6,67%
---------------- S18681 - 5,05%
---------------- L1280 - 2,22%
---------------- other Y33 - 0,40%
------------ YP237 - 13,54%
---------------- YP389 - 4,44%
---------------- YP977 - 3,84%
---------------- L269 - 2,02%
---------------- other YP237 - 3,24%
------------ Y2613 - 4,04%
---------------- Y2608 - 3,64%
---------------- other Y2613 - 0,40%
------------ other CTS3402 - 0,20%
-------- YP343 - 4,04%
------------ YP371 - 2,83%
------------ other YP343 - 1,21%
---- Z92 - 8,48%
-------- Z685 - 5,66%
------------ CTS4648 - 2,83%
------------ YP351 - 2,83%
-------- Z92 type E - 2,42%
-------- other Z92 - 0,40%

All other R1a - 1,01%
 
YFull estimates the age of R1a-CTS1211 to be ~4600 years, and TMRCA ~4400 years ago:

https://www.yfull.com/tree/R-CTS1211/

If these estimates are correct, Spiginas2 is not much younger than TMRCA of this subclade.
 
Already 5 ancient samples of CTS1211 (M558), 2 from Lithuania and 3 from Latvia:

Spiginas2, 2130-1750 BC, Baltic_EBA, R1a-Z280>CTS1211+
Spiginas25, 800–545 BC, Baltic_BA, R1a-Z280>CTS1211+

Kivutkalns222, 805–515 BC, Baltic_BA, R1a-Z280>CTS1211>YP1034>Y13467+
Kivutkalns19, 730-400 BC, Baltic_LBA, R1a-Z280>CTS1211>YP1034>Y13467+
Kivutkalns209, 405-230 BC, Baltic_IA, R1a-Z280>CTS1211>YP1034>Y13467+

In discussion on Anthrogenica, Michał pointed out the frequency of CTS1211 in modern Belarusians and Russians (ca. 1/4 of entire Y-DNA in both cases), and I noticed that CTS1211 was very common among pre-war East Prussias (ca. 1/5 of the entire East Prussian sample of 84 men, so about as common as in Polish people):

https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?652...ll=1#post341743

East Prussian carriers of R1a-CTS1211 (16 people from FTDNA Projects):

kit E10339 - surname of the oldest known ancestor not given
kit 85285 - Friedrich Lichtenstein b. in 1870 in Königsberg
kit 175710 - Georg Glass b. in 1810 in Babanten
kit 200664 - Simon Netke, b. in 1686 in Königsberg
kit 165792 - J. M. Sommerfeld, b. in 1750 in Tiegenort
kit N7393 - Reimer b. in 1720 in Hoppenau
kit 153224 - Leopold Lau, b. in 1867 in Kompehnen
kit 275076 - Georg Gottlieb Gutt, b. in 1729 in Brodnica
kit 71994 - Franz Pallaschke, b. in 1883 in Buddern
kit 330940 - Friedrich Malesha, b. in 1800 in Soldahnen
kit 2546 - Johann Piasetzki, b. in 1860 in Sensburg
kit E4464 - Karl Labinsky b. in 1840 in Trempen
kit E9666 - J. Pawellek b. in 1853 in Ortelsburg
kit 426239 - Kalinowski b. in 1878 in Riesenwalde
kit 131361 - J. Jablonowski, born near Soldau
kit N18451 - Frank J. Zalewski, b. in 1858 in Gotschalki

^^^
Many of these surnames are purely German rather than Masurian etc., so most likely it is from assimilated Old Prussians. Some of them carry subclades of M558 typical for present-day East Balts.

But I pointed out the fact, that we don't know which subclades were typical for West Balts, because there is no ancient DNA from East Prussia - so maybe subclades of West Balts were more like these typical for present-day Slavs, than like these typical for present-day Lithuanians and Latvians. The map below shows the breakdown of East Prussian R1a into typically Slavic and typically East Baltic, based on modern frequencies:

https://s31.postimg.org/mfwjkq5or/Old_Prussian_R1a_surnames.png

Old_Prussian_R1a_surnames.png
 
Turlojiske3, Lithuania, Bronze Age, 1010–800 BC, R1a1a1b1a2a-YP617 (Genetiker's calls).

This is a subclade of Z92>Y4459:

https://www.yfull.com/tree/R-Y4459/

Basal R-Y4459* has been found in North-Eastern Poland - id:YF10363POL [PL-Podlaskie].

All of Z92 is about 8.5% to 10% of Polish R1a (and divide in half for % of Polish Y-DNA).
 
Kivutkalns153, Latvia, Bronze Age, 800–545 BC, R1a1a1b1a3-YP1370 (a subclade of R1a-Z284).

I guess this Z284 from Bronze Age Latvia proves that some R1a came to Scandinavia from East Baltic area.

These are the oldest R1a samples from Scandinavia:

Sweden RISE94, Viby, Götaland, 2621-2472 BC
Denmark RISE61, Kyndeløse, Zealand, 2650-2300 BC
Sweden LNBA, Ölsund, Hälsingland, 2573-2140 BC
Denmark RISE42, Marbjerg, Zealand, 2191-1972 BC

As you can see 3 of them are from Southern Scandinavia, but one (Olsund) is from Northern Sweden.

Olsund individual is discussed in this paper:

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2017/03/03/113241.full.pdfhttps://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/suppl/2017/03/03/113241.DC1/113241-1.pdf

About the origins of Corded Ware culture:

http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2017/12/corded-ware-as-offshoot-of-hungarian.html

R1a migrated to Scandinavia either from Latvia-Lithuania-Poland by boats across the Baltic Sea, or from Germany (both routes are possible). N1c migrated to Scandinavia much later and probably from Finland-Estonia (ultimately from North-Western Russia).

Possible routes of R1a migration to Scandinavia with Corded Ware culture (red arrows):

https://i.imgur.com/GfE3Abm.png

GfE3Abm.png


This paper claims that the Olsund sample was most autosomally most similar to Baltic Bronze Age samples:

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2017/03/03/113241.full.pdf

CTRL + F type Olsund and find this info.

Also rock art of native Scandinavians (Non-R1) depicts the arrival of some R1-men by boats.

Native, Non-IE Scandinavians used to create rock carvings already ca. 6500 years ago.

They were documenting scenes from everyday life, such as hunting:

http://www.rockartscandinavia.com/frontpage.phphttp://fri.info.pl/rysunki-naskalne-alta/

Norgev228.jpg


a3.jpg


a5.jpg
a12.jpg


At the beginning of the Metal Ages, completely new motifs appear in Scandinavian rock art. These new carvings depict the arrival - by sea - of large fleets of immigrants, who had the knowledge of metal-working, were armed in battle axes (see: Battle Axe culture) and worshipped foreign deities:

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rysunki_naskalne_w_Tanum

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ld6Dt-Lce6MVideo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDXQCUpjAyk

_343312_orig.jpg


800px-Tanumshede_2005_rock_carvings_5.jpg


EipYPeg.png


a11.jpg


Carvings.png


Tanumshede_2005_rock_carvings_3.jpg


This artwork most likely depicts an Indo-European high priest, an archetype of god Thor:

torvitl.jpg


^^^ This is consistent with Oslund R1a man being possibly descended from Baltic Bronze Age immigrants.
 
The oldest known sample of N1c from Europe is dated to ca. 2500 BC, found near Smolensk in Russia. There was no any N1c in Scandinavia at that time, but there was already some in western Russia. Apparently there was also no N1c in Bronze Age Lithuania and Latvia. But despite the lack of ancient samples, some N1c could cross the Ural and enter Europe already ca. 5500 BC (which is the estimated TMRCA for N1c-L708, the most upstream subclade of N1c which exists in Europe - subclades more upstream than L708 can be found only in Asia).
 
What is so surprising in the presence of some EEF among LN Baltic?: first CWC were poor of it, but an almost contemporaneous pop, GAC, has a great load of EEF; GAC people didn' t disappear as by a magic trick; and we have a more powerful culture rich in EEF: Tripolye; borrowing of some tehcnics + borrwing of wives?
I agree with the people who don't see a link between Germanics and CWC; I see rather a proto-Baltic or Baltic-Slavic element in CWC. The so called 'danubian med' type common among first EEF seems the dominant element among the southern influences on modern pops of N-E Europe, even among Finns. In Steppes, the slight EEF of MBA/LBA element could have more than a region of origin, helas for us. Late exchanges N > S + S > N across Caucasus?
Unetice was a mixed culture in itself, even if some element dominated, and had spred into local preceding surrounding cultures as well by cultural transmission as by some demic impulse. But the U106 first "babyboomers", I think, were rather in the EastGermany part of the Unetice field (descendants of the famous "Rich Tumuli culture" of the Saale/Thuringen region?
 
Ah yes, anything but Slavic.
That's just a typical fantasy on your part. CWC couldn't be Germanic for a simple reason, Germanic languages belong to a Centum family. CWC were ancestors of Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian. Deal with it. Unless of course, we're still playing with Indo-Germanic fairy tales.

I think you should have said...anything except just Baltic ..............deal with the fact that baltic people where there before germanic and slavic

Centum and Satem is irrelevant these people lived all over Europe side by side swapping vocabulary, people make too big a deal about it .....especially when they say the ethnicity of people A and ethnicity of people B are the same people and then you throw in , one spoke centum and the other satem,...........they disappear never to be heard of again
 

The oldest known sample of R1b-U106 is actually from Corded Ware context in Sweden (or am I wrong)? But the 2nd oldest sample is from Bell Beaker context in the Netherlands:

pg2bEQX.png
 

This thread has been viewed 94254 times.

Back
Top