Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 35 of 35

Thread: What is the ideal education system ?

  1. #26
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    firetown's Avatar
    Join Date
    27-08-11
    Posts
    409
    Points
    7,230
    Level
    25
    Points: 7,230, Level: 25
    Level completed: 36%, Points required for next Level: 320
    Overall activity: 0%


    Ethnic group
    Polish/German/Jewish/Rh-
    Country: USA - California





    The ideal education system allows students to express their passions first. Then fuels their motivations. Teaching everyone more or less the same is turning society into miserable sheep. Individualism is what the world needs not just for people to exceed in their fields but also the world to have more positive energy.

  2. #27
    Menachem Moscovitz menachemmoscovitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-05-18
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1
    Points
    92
    Level
    1
    Points: 92, Level: 1
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 58
    Overall activity: 0%


    Country: USA - New York



    Yes, education is a important part of our life, education activate our skills.

  3. #28
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    18-07-18
    Posts
    3
    Points
    28
    Level
    1
    Points: 28, Level: 1
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 22
    Overall activity: 3.0%


    Country: USA - Florida



    Quote Originally Posted by Maciamo View Post
    Introduction
    Education is one of the most important thing for a society to prosper and be safe. Education forms the character and intelligence of individuals. But how should governments proceed to educate their country's children in an optimum way ?
    There are remarkable differences in the content and the way things are taught in schools around the world, and even in the so-called developed countries. But one sure thing is that no country possess a perfect education system, and IMO, the education level has been decreasing, while children and teenagers have alongside become more difficult and better protected by their parents than before. As a result, school becomes less strict and less efficient.
    Europe vs Japan
    Comparing the purpose of education in Japan and Europe, I realized that the main difference was that European go to school to learn and graduate with an expected amount of knowledge and reasoning skills (analysis, logic, critical skills, skepticism, etc.). The Japanese system teaches more how to behave in society, interact with people in a group and some factual knowledge based especially on memory.
    There isn't one right system, as what one has, the other lacks. Japanese stress the importance of harmony over intelligence for itslef. That is why it is extremely rare for a pupil/student to fail a year, while it happens in almost every classes (often several people per class) in Europe. I understand that in a society based on group harmony and not distinguisinh oneself, it would be very traumatizing for a Japanese to be the only one to fail, and feel completely excluded from the group. As a result, nobody fails ! That seems too easy, but it certainly has the advantage of releasing the pressure and avoiding children to develop psychological problems or anti-social behaviour (as often happens with repeaters in the West).
    The Western mentality insists that anybody who doesn't reach the expected knowledge or reasoning skill level should be punished and fail. The advantage is that students fear losing a year of their life (+ consequences to find a job later) and try harder to assimilate the knowledge and theoretically obey better the teacher for fear of failing because of misbehaviour (a serious weapon teacher have on students).
    Furthermore, harmony in a strongly individualistic society where difference and originality is valued (like in most of Western countries) can only be achieved among like-minded people. So the only way to increase harmony and increase socialization is by grouping similar people together, as I will explain below.
    Combining the two aspects : the ideal system
    So, which shall we promote ? Stable psychology and socialization (Japan), or high intellectual exigency and the pressure that goes with it (Europe) ?
    I think the ideal system is a combination of both, but including 2 important new factors that are usually not presents in most schools in Europe and Japan.
    Firstly, classes should be divided by ability. The advantage is that it is more efficient, as good student are more motivated and don't feel slowed down by the rest, and less good students can spend more time on weaker subjects until they understand them. As of course most people have strong and weak subjects (some are good at everything or bad at everything, but they are few), each subject should have about 3 levels (strong, average, weak), and students should join according to their performance in each of them. So, if some is very good at maths, average at history and weak at languages, then they should join the appropriate class level for each subject.
    But should the year-end exams be the same for all levels ? There are 2 possibilities :
    1) Different exams for each level, leading to different certifications at the end. Completing one education cycle (3 or 6 years), the students would get a certification mentioning which level course they have followed (and passed the exam) for each subject. That has the other advantage that employers would know immediately the real strength and weakness of the person they recruit, and for students to choose more easily their college/university orientation and the carrier that best fit their capabilities.
    2) Same exams, but different number of hours depending on the ability. Good students would have less hours to study the same thing, so more freetime, either to study weaker subjects, or if there aren't any, just to relax or go back home earlier. That is an excellent motivation for people to take the most difficult course and concentrate hard, so that they have to spend less time at school. But not everybody is able to, and teachers should direct the students to classes matching their ability if they can't realise it by themselves.
    The point of both systems is to release pressure on too difficult subjects and give the opportunity to learn more in what one is good at. Students could be allowed to change class level within the year, if they realized it is too easy or too difficult. That would also reduce dramatically the failure rate at school, and improve social relationships, as students would be with other people of similar intelligence, abilities and interest. This would be re-inforced by my second point hereinafter.
    Secondly, schools should give a wide range of options to the students, with a minimum requirement in each subject. For this the government's curriculum has to be flexible enough and not to complete. It is usually ok in Europe, but the Japanese Ministry of Education is notorious for deciding the exact content of everthing and limiting the use of school books to only a few government approved ones. In comparison, European teachers (maybe not everywhere ??), have the freedom to use any book they want, approved or not, decide more or less what they teach and even create their own materials (most of my teachers distributed photocopies of documents that they had written themselves or didn't use any book at all, which would only get the teachers fired and have serious problems in Japan, have I been told).
    The idea is to give the students the chance to learn what they like best, or at least to have more hours of their favourite subjects (or those they deem necessary for their future). This system is already the norm in most English-speaking countries, but is much less developed in continental Europe, where all students must learn all subjects, and can usually only choose to have a few more or less hours a week of some subjects (like maths, sciences or languages). But they are almost always allowed to choose at least their foreign languages (the number of choices vary depending on the school itself) and some options not in the curriculum (e.g. psychology, economy. arts, electricity...).
    I think the best system should have a minimum requirement for important subjects such as maths, one's mother tongue, history, geography, sciences and maybe even some economy (e.g. like how to manage one's money or how to pay one's taxes) or psychology (e.g. how to study more effectively or analyze one's personality). In addition, people should choose some options or more hours of the compulsory subjects. That is the best way of motivating students, and not have them fall asleep in class or feel school is useless.
    Conclusion
    The ideal school system should divide students by abilities, give them the possibility to change class level according to how they follow, so as to reduce the failure rate and increase socialization, but also be able to choose options quite early based on their interest so as to stimulate their motivation, and further increase socialization. The goverment should give enough freedom to schools and teachers to achieve this, while keeping a minimum curriculum for important subjects.
    Loved your ideas! though there can never be an ideal system that could be replicated across all the cultures and societies but this thread of creating a 'customized' system based on the ability of a student and treat them accordingly could motivate them a lot.

  4. #29
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    03-09-18
    Posts
    12
    Points
    60
    Level
    1
    Points: 60, Level: 1
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 90
    Overall activity: 10.0%


    Country: United States



    Great article. Thanks for sharing!

  5. #30
    Regular Member Achievements:
    3 months registeredTagger Second Class500 Experience Points
    edulofter's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-11-18
    Posts
    19
    Points
    593
    Level
    6
    Points: 593, Level: 6
    Level completed: 22%, Points required for next Level: 157
    Overall activity: 5.0%


    Country: China



    The education system in many countries needs reform, especially China. I should think more about studying in the United States and Japan. China's education system will make China's education decline. I am more advocating free education and pluralistic education in the United States and Japan.

  6. #31
    Regular Member Achievements:
    3 months registered250 Experience Points

    Join Date
    11-12-18
    Posts
    15
    Points
    494
    Level
    5
    Points: 494, Level: 5
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 56
    Overall activity: 0%


    Country: El Salvador



    Well, Japanese educational system seems to be great, but it doesn’t work I some point. Just remember what kind of people Japanese are. They work hard, they have a lot of pressure and competitions, they have a high percentage of suicides because of that, so we can’t say it’s all about stable psychology and socialization. So yeah, Europe is all about intellect and studying hard, but there’s a law pressure in comparison with Japan. I was interested in this topic couple of years ago and I’ve found a lot of bad facts about both of them, even asked essay writer to analyze and compile all the info to make it look like a normal research.

  7. #32
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    26-06-19
    Posts
    1
    Points
    44
    Level
    1
    Points: 44, Level: 1
    Level completed: 88%, Points required for next Level: 6
    Overall activity: 0%


    Country: Australia



    Nice illustration for ideal education system and I really like your conclusion. Thank you

  8. #33
    Regular Member Achievements:
    3 months registered250 Experience Points

    Join Date
    11-12-18
    Posts
    15
    Points
    494
    Level
    5
    Points: 494, Level: 5
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 56
    Overall activity: 0%


    Country: El Salvador



    Idk, I think it’s different for everyone. For me such a system shouldn’t contain literature class xD Because I really hate it and have huge troubles with my teacher. But I should probably agree with guys who said “allows students to express their passions first”. And also something about freedom of speech. I have troubles only because my teacher strongly disagrees with all of my ideas. But I already dealt with that and started working with edubirdie reviews so they could write essays for me and I wouldn’t get in trouble because of my position again.

  9. #34
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    25-06-18
    Posts
    332
    Points
    5,032
    Level
    20
    Points: 5,032, Level: 20
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 18
    Overall activity: 41.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-M269 (LDNA)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    U5a1b

    Ethnic group
    Thracian
    Country: Greece



    There is not an ideal educational system. But here are some ideas:

    1. Grade school - Socialization mainly, learn how to play well with others. Yes, each them how to read and write using fun and games but mainly use this level to teach them how to work as a team. Instill in them the love of reading, of creating, of imagination. Teach them how to use media to express their ideas.
    2. Middle school - Start teaching them the scientific method.Have them engage in fun, scientific projects such as cleaning up a polluted river in the state. Give them placement tests that gauge their interests and abilities and help place them in different levels of accomplishment. Teach them about the world around us. Geography, history, world history, biology, psychology, zoology, etc. They don't need to be at an advanced level although more advanced levels should be available to interested students. Math such as algebra and geometry should be introduced around the age of 15, earlier for more precocious students. Alternative instruction via recorded lessons should be available. Let's face it, not all teachers are good and being taught by a better teacher should be available. Advancement should be by standardized testing. Tests should be given once a month or more frequently to test a self contained instruction unit. Tests should be online and results immediately available. Advancement tests at the end of the year or semester put way too much pressure on kids and allow the kids to slack off during the rest of the year. Kids should be able to retake a unit that they failed. Again, different levels of instruction should be available (Basic, Honors, Advanced). A team project should be also undertaken for the year involving service to the community. Lots of after school clubs and activities should be offered (music, foreign languages, theatre, service clubs, etc.)
    3. High School - The age of specialization, with both technical (math, science), medical (Advanced Biology, Anatomy, etc), legal, liberal arts and more practical (plumbing, electrical, car repair) courses available. Apprenticeships should be available for those more inclined for hands on work. Same standards as middle school apply.
    4. Undergraduate - Entrance should be granted to those that showed high achievement throughout their high school career as shown by the Advanced Placements tests at the conclusion of an Advanced Placement courses, not some arbitrary entrance exam at the conclusion of your high school career that devalues all the hard work you did during HS. Here again there should be a bifurcation between those that want to graduate and gets jobs in the real world and those that want to pursue graduate studies. Pair down the courses to achieve a degree. For example, in engineering, Statics and Dynamics courses should only be taught to engineering disciplines that will use them in their line of work. Same thing for Thermodynamics, etc. Only teach university courses that will be used in one's work in the real world. Courses that emphasize work in the real world should replace useless courses. University takes way too long to produce graduates that are real world ready. For example, to become a doctor in the US you have to go 4 years to pre-med, 4 years of medical school, one year of internship, 3-6 years of specialization/residency. That's way, way too long and too expensive. Pare it down to 4 years of medical school and then 3-6 years of residency. University should be all about teaching and not research so hire good teachers. I was taught certain engineering courses by Chinese graduate students that could not speak English to save their lives and were bad teachers to boot. Hire talented university instructors that can actually teach.
    5. Graduate School - Should be separate from the undergraduate level. Do not attempt to get graduate students to teach at the undergraduate level. They can engage in research activities while they are taking advanced courses.
    6. Research - Should be conducted at a Research Institute associated with the University.

    Oh, education at all levels should be free although private universities should be allowed. Remote and OTT instruction should be available so if you live in Nice, you should not have to leave your parents home in Nice to study at the Ecole Polytechnique.

  10. #35
    Writemaster
    Join Date
    05-08-19
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    4
    Points
    89
    Level
    1
    Points: 89, Level: 1
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 61
    Overall activity: 6.0%


    Ethnic group
    English
    Country: United Kingdom



    Nice idea!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. How to reform the Continental European education system ?
    By Maciamo in forum European News & Hot Topics
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-08-19, 19:15
  2. Replies: 44
    Last Post: 27-06-19, 06:18
  3. About your education system.
    By No-name in forum Education
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 17-07-18, 19:14
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 26-03-11, 16:37
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-07-09, 22:27

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •