Yes, I agree with what he said. No one can comprehend the true nature of God completely, if indeed he exists. What I was trying to express was why the image of the Godhead in Catholic dogma "appeals" to me so much more than the images of God presented by the other major religions. Of course, it appeals for a lot of reasons, because of the years of, some would say, indoctrination in Christian theology, because it is a "western" concept of God, although whether Christianity created the western mind or the western mind created Christianity is an open question for me. It appeals, unlike Judaism, because it speaks to, and offers salvation to, every human being on earth, not just one ethnic group.
It's also because it answers the needs of my own personality. The omnipresence of human suffering is very "real" and "visceral" to me. Every psychological test I've ever taken reports very high levels of empathy, although I didn't need tests to tell me that. It was one of the problems I had with my profession. I was literally becoming ill from the constant exposure to the suffering inflicted on people by other human beings, in addition to the suffering that is just part of existence, the suffering of innocents through disease, physical as well as psychological. That's why I could never have become a doctor or psychiatrist or social worker. It's as if I feel people's suffering myself, and I've come to believe that in too many chases there is nothing that we can do. I want that suffering to have meaning.
I also am extraordinarily attached to the people I love, not must parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles, but also extremely close friends. Their loss is an open wound. My mother died almost two decades ago; speaking of her suffering and death to others is still almost impossible for me because I embarrass myself by dissolving into tears. I don't want a God where upon my death my consciousness disappears into some "universal soul". It's not enough. I want to know her, them, as myself. I want the reunion promised by Christianity.
So, Christianity is the religion which most "appeals" to me, answers questions about existence in a manner that satisfies me.
However, is it "true"? Is it close to the reality? I still don't know. I wish I had the belief that I used to have in my childhood and young adulthood, but I don't. I haven't been able to make that "leap" into faith that Kierkegaard discusses. I know people who still attend Mass, recite the Nicene creed by rote, take Communion, but don't really "believe" some of the tenets of that Creed. I can't do that. It isn't enough that I could recite it in my sleep; if I can't BELIEVE all of its tenets, then I'm not really a Christian, and so I won't go.