Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Nature vs Nurture : can parents really make their children smarter ?

  1. #1
    Satyavrata Maciamo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Ethnic group
    Country: Belgium - Brussels

    Post Nature vs Nurture : can parents really make their children smarter ?

    According to the data research in the book Freakonomics, it is not what parents do but how they are that will determine their children's school results and success in life.

    In summary, they have gathered the data of 20,000 school children in Chicago, and compared hundreds of variables (math score in first grade, number of books at home, do the parents spank their children...) to look for correlations with school results.

    A few variables showed a strong correlation, while others do not matter at all. For example:

    Children with parents who are highly educated, had a lot of books at home or from high socioeconomic status do perform better than others.

    However, having divorced parents, or moving to a better neighbourhood does not affect academic results. Taking your kids to museums or reading to them a lot also doesn't make any difference.

    Whether the mother worked or not between birth and kindergarten didn't matter at all. Likewise, spaning children or letting them watch a lot of TV didn't influence negatively.

    Children who had a low birthweight and adopted children didn't perform well at school, no matter the parents's educational level or how much they cared for them.

    They explain that this is because adopted children typically have parents with lower IQ's, and because the mothers also didn't take as much prenatal care when they knew the child would end up being adopted. Children with low birthweight might have been born prematurely, or the mother might have had an unhealthy lifestyle during pregnancy (smoking, drugs, alcohol, bad food, negative emotions...).

    Three adoption studies, two American and one British, also show that parents that dopt children are typically smarter, better educated and more highly paid than the baby's biological parents. Yet adopted children perform relatively poorly in schools, regardless of the influence of the adoptive parents.

    Based on all this data and numerous researches, they conclude that genetics, prenatal care and IQ (which they consider strongly hereditary) are therefore more important than what parents do for their children's education.

    This study has the merits to put less pressure on parents obssessed with their children's well-being or academic results.
    Check this selection of my best forum topics
    My book selection
    ---Follow me on Facebook and Twitter --- My profile on and on ResearchGate ----Check Wa-pedia's Japan Guide
    "What is the use of living, if it be not to strive for noble causes and to make this muddled world a better place for those who will live in it after we are gone?", Winston Churchill.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date

    Country: China

    I think nature and nurture also are very important, especially the parents should teach their children properly.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date

    Country: India

    Yes definitely parents can make their children smarter...

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 36
    Last Post: 15-10-22, 14:18
  2. Nature vs Nurture - Feral Children
    By edao in forum Life Sciences
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-03-12, 15:57
  3. Book summary : Nature via Nurture
    By Maciamo in forum Gene Expression & Data Analysis
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-08-09, 12:43
  4. Men Smarter than Women, Scientist Claims
    By Wang in forum World News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 22-09-06, 23:21
  5. Nature: Organized or Disorderly ?
    By lexico in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-10-05, 11:35

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts