spongetaro
Elite member
- Messages
- 717
- Reaction score
- 42
- Points
- 0
SO ? A wise solution would be not to prove anythingPerhaps in the same way that you can not prove otherwise.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
SO ? A wise solution would be not to prove anythingPerhaps in the same way that you can not prove otherwise.
Language and genetics are not related. For example, Iranians speak an indo-european langauge, yet all europeans are genetically closer to BasquesI only mentioned languages that were spoken by mostly S116 people and as you pointed out, none of those language are celtic
The problem with you Cambria red is that you don't want to admit that neither Lusitanian nor S116 was Celtic.
To what extent could we consider Iberian, Basque, Latin, Aquitanian and Rhaetian Celtic languages ?
in a study the shortest distance in Europe was between french spaniards. .
SO ? A wise solution would be not to prove anything
Language and genetics are not related. For example, Iranians speak an indo-european langauge, yet all europeans are genetically closer to Basques
The smart thing would be to accept the truth, there is no way the truth and she will fight to the end.
Wait, wait, wait here. First of all : There is something called genetic distances (Fst) which clearly show that Iberians and French are very related, in fact in a study the shortest distance in Europe was between french spaniards. Second : The British people are not celts, far from it, they have a lot of germanic and nordic influence, you can see this in all the autosomal and admixture analyisis (their north-european levels) and their clustering towards north-europeans.
Language and genetics are not related. For example, Iranians speak an indo-european langauge, yet all europeans are genetically closer to Basques
The British people are not celts, far from it, they have a lot of germanic and nordic influence, you can see this in all the autosomal and admixture analyisis (their north-european levels) and their clustering towards north-europeans.
That's not the haplogroups you have in common with Iberia. And btw in the Myres et al. study the Eastern French have 24% of S116*.France is not fully Celt as I said earlier, the Celtic core of Europe may have ended in Eastern France. All the haplogroup that we have in common with Iberian (S116*, M53, M167, EM81) that prevails in South West France makes France even less Celt
So what makes us European is mainly of Palolithic and Neolithic age ?
Not really Celt don't you find
Wait, wait, wait here. First of all : There is something called genetic distances (Fst) which clearly show that Iberians and French are very related, in fact in a study the shortest distance in Europe was between french spaniards.
See the Eurogenes and Dodecad Projects. The British/Irish have a ton of northern-european admixture, and they are from all parts of the country.Sorry Wilhelm, I still think you're wrong here regarding the Brits. There are areas of Britain with little Germanic influence, and the maximum it reaches are somewhere around 70% (patriline only) in the East. The remaining Celtic influence in much of Britain is apparent. I think it's more likely that the autosomal differences between Iberians and British people comes more from the fact that their (paleolithically European) non-patrilines have had a long time to diverge.
What ? I never said such thing. It is you who said brits are celts, and then you say the celts ended in eastern-France, you don't make any sense. Btw is not true that L21 is alsmo non-existant in Iberia, see this thread : http://www.eupedia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25860You like to believe that before the Anglo Saxon and Vikings invasion, Spaniards and Scots did look the same but according to Roman authors, a great deal of Caledonians were already red haired.
BTW, R1b L21 is almost non existent in Iberia like U152
Another evidence that S116* is older than the Celt. Just imagine a Celtic invasion from Eastern France that bring to most of Spaniard S116* without carrying any U152 or L21That's not the haplogroups you have in common with Iberia. And btw in the Myres et al. study the Eastern French have 24% of S116*.
I never said we cluster with British or Central Europeans. I said we cluster with French.Indeed, France and Spaniards are very close genetically. Have you noticed that most of the Time Spain cluster with France and Portugal and sometimes Italy while France cluster with Spain, Switzerland, Southern Germany and sometimes the British Island.
In fact, in all genetic aspect (haplogroup, autosomal) Spain and Portugal are not particuraly close to British and Central European
I never said we cluster with British or Central Europeans. I said we cluster with French.
See the Eurogenes and Dodecad Projects. The British/Irish have a ton of northern-european admixture, and they are from all parts of the country.
See the Eurogenes and Dodecad Projects. The British/Irish have a ton of northern-european admixture, and they are from all parts of the country.
What ? I never said such thing. It is you who said brits are celts, and then you say the celts ended in eastern-France, you don't make any sense. Btw is not true that L21 is alsmo non-existant in Iberia, see this thread : http://www.eupedia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25860
Anyways you are now changing : You said first U152, now L21, what's next
This thread has been viewed 1018326 times.