Turkic replacement of IE languages in Central Asia

Maciamo

Veteran member
Admin
Messages
9,949
Reaction score
3,229
Points
113
Location
Lothier
Ethnic group
Italo-celto-germanic
Hello Maciamo ,

I don't understand What you Mean by : "Turkic invasions therefore contributed more to the diffusion of Indo-European lineages (especially R1a1) than East Asian ones." ?

And about "Hungarian, sometimes mistaken for the heir of Hunnic because of its name, is in reality an Uralic language (Magyar)" I have read : The Madjars show evidence of extensive genetic drift, with 24/45 carrying the same 12-STR haplotype within haplogroup G. Genetic distances based on haplogroup frequencies were used to compare the Madjars with 37 other populations and showed that they were closest to the Hungarian population rather than their geographical neighbors .
source : "Haplogroup G (Y-DNA) Information, Haplogroup G (Y-DNA) Reference ... Information and research on Haplogroup G (Y-DNA) on FindTarget Reference ... of the tested men were G. The Madyars of Kazakhstan were found to be 87% G1"
 
Hello Maciamo ,
I don't understand What you Mean by : "Turkic invasions therefore contributed more to the diffusion of Indo-European lineages (especially R1a1) than East Asian ones." ?

It means that Turkic people who invaded Europe were predominantly R1a1. Few Turkic speakers are/were C3, O or Q, which is why these lineages are so rare even between Hungary and Bulgaria.
 
Hungarian and Bulgarian R1A was http://lingvo.yandex.ru/en?text=brought brought by the Turkic peoples in EUROPE?

I didn't say that. Please read my history of R1a and my post 5000 years of migrations from the Eurasian steppes to Europe. It explains all the migrations that have brought R1a to Eastern Europe. Turkic people (Huns, Alans, Avars, Khazars, Bulgars, Turks) were the last waves, only 500 years out of 5000 years of steppe migration. What I meant is that these Turkic people were R1a, but they are not responsible for all the R1a in Eastern Europe, just a part of it (impossible to determine the proportion at present).
 
Huns Turks ? and Alans ? Turkic people were R1a ? hummm ... Alans ok but Huns ..
 
When you say : "Turkic invasions therefore contributed more to the diffusion of Indo-European lineages (especially R1a1) than East Asian ones." ? There is a big confusion between indo european that is a culture and a langage and Turkic invasion R1a ? Turkic people are not indo europeans !
 
When you say : "Turkic invasions therefore contributed more to the diffusion of Indo-European lineages (especially R1a1) than East Asian ones." ? There is a big confusion between indo european that is a culture and a langage and Turkic invasion R1a ? Turkic people are not indo europeans !

Turkic speakers diffused mainly "IE lineages" into Europe in so far as they distributed ancient racial lineages that are associated with the historical spread of IE culture. They were predominantly of R1a lineage, indeed formerly spoke IE languages and they entered Europe as a later of many R1a waves, the earlier of which contributed to the spread of IE culture into Europe.

Do you define 'Indo-Europeans' as you put it solely by the language that people presently speak? That would mean that the African slaves in the Caribbean for instance became IEs as soon as they adopted an IE language.

Or do you define it to mean that persons are IE only if none of their ancestors ever spoke a non-IE language? That would exclude all present Europeans AFAIK as we all have non-IE ancestry AFAIK, including ice age I Hg and Near Eastern J2, E3b etc.

So how exactly do you define it?

If its by language then Africans are in, if its by race then Europeans and Africans are all out and if its by both then all are still out.
 
Sorry but Turkic people are not europeans ! Indo Europeans are the ancestors of the European people Germanic Celts the Ancient Greeks ... etc There is no Turkish in that team .Under the Ottoman Empire people of European origin were numerous but they were dominated and mixed by a non-European culture and a non-European people.
 
Indo Europeans are the ancestors of the European people

Are you saying that the ancestors of Europeans were IEs?

That would include Hgs I, J, E, G and all of the other ancestors of Europeans.

So any group that enters Europe becomes IE along with all of its ancestors?

And what about the ancestors of the Indians, were they IEs?
 
"Are you saying that the ancestors of Europeans were IEs?"
Yes the ancestors of Europeans were indo europeans .


"So any group that enters Europe and adopts an IE language becomes IE and so do all of their ancestors?"
If I go to Japan and I learn Japanese langage and integrate Japanese culture it does not make me a Japanese .
 
"Are you saying that the ancestors of Europeans were IEs?"

Yes the ancestors of Europeans were indo europeans.

Can you offer any etymology for that use of the term?

As I said, that would include the full E to R of European haplogroups and I am not aware that anyone else uses the term in that way.

Do you get the bit about the spread through Eurasia of IE languages being linked to the diffusion of Hgs. R1a and R1b?
 
If I go to Japan and I learn Japanese langage and integrate Japanese culture it does not make me a Japanese .

Were the ancestors of Europeans all of one race in your opinion, E to R, so to say?

Were those ancient races already IE in your opinion or did they later become IE when their descendants migrated to Europe and adopted an IE language?
 
"Are you saying that the ancestors of Europeans were IEs?"
Yes the ancestors of Europeans were indo europeans .


"So any group that enters Europe and adopts an IE language becomes IE and so do all of their ancestors?"
If I go to Japan and I learn Japanese langage and integrate Japanese culture it does not make me a Japanese .
Wrong. Not all ancestors of Europeans are indo-europeans. Before indo-europeans Europe had already a population descended from Cro-Magnon who were haplogroup I, also other european ancestors inlcude Near Easterns who had haplogroups J, E, etc.
 
It is a mistake to speak of divergent haplogroup I J E G R all were in Europe earlier and have evolved together and those europeans built a common I.E culture more than 7000 years ago . This population is similar in its culture and its genes from the Germanic countries to Ireland from Austria to Sweden whatever is hp G, R or I ..
 
It is a mistake to speak of divergent haplogroup I J E G R all were in Europe earlier and have evolved together and those europeans built a common I.E culture more than 7000 years ago . This population is similar in its culture and its genes from the Germanic countries to Ireland from Austria to Sweden whatever is hp G, R or I ..

Can you refer us to any peer-reviewed scientific studies that purport to establish that?

You may as well say that Europeans are descended from Adam and Eve and got booted out of the garden of Eden 6000 years ago for stealing apples off the tree and that Adam and Eve were IE.
 
just look at the racial unity of the North European and the mixed Turkish people
 
just look at the racial unity of the North European and the mixed Turkish people

All European nations, including those of northern Europe, are multi-hybrid and made up of a spectrum of distinct ancient Eurasian races that entered Europe at different times, plus the north African E3b, the last to leave Africa.

http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtml

There is no IE Adam and Eve there.

Indeed the ice age European I Hg has common ancestry with the Near Eastern J group while the IE R1 groups have common ancestry with the Asian Q group.

The north Eurasian N group is also strong in northern Europe, particularly to the NE and that has common ancestry with the east Asian O group that is common in China.

In other words all of the ancient races that are common in northern Europe have closer ancestry with groups that are most common now in Asia than they have with each other.

Where is the especial "racial unity" that you speak of there?

Northern Europe is just as Eurasian as anywhere else?
 
Sorry but Turkic people are not europeans ! Indo Europeans are the ancestors of the European people Germanic Celts the Ancient Greeks ... etc There is no Turkish in that team .Under the Ottoman Empire people of European origin were numerous but they were dominated and mixed by a non-European culture and a non-European people.

The Greeks are much closer genetically to the people of Turkey, especially the western half and to the people of southern Italy than they are to the Germanics or the Celts.

The map that shows the present distribution of ancient Greek DNA correlates closely with the map of the Byzantine Empire (see below.)

Yes the population of Turkey is predominantly of Anatolian stock but that does not mean that they are "of European origin" as you say. Rather Europe was populated through Turkey though there has of course been a certain amount of back migration and general movement back and forth.

The border between Europe and Asia is arbitrary and essentially political. Political lines have not always been drawn in the same places.

The present distribution of ancient Greek autosomal DNA:

greekcolonization.jpg


http://dienekes.50webs.com/arp/articles/greekadna/

The Byzantine Empire:

Byzantine_Empire_animated2.gif
 

This thread has been viewed 54949 times.

Back
Top