Y dna haplogroup T

[Salento]

what are we doing here ?

I’m using MTA Deep Dive settings (60 SNPs) on GedMatch One-to-One, and trying to get a “minimum” result:

… on GedMatch “One-to-One Autosomal DNA Comparison”, input the Ancient Kit ID and Yours,

… Write 60 where it says: “SNP window size threshold. Leave blank for default to vary dynamically between 200-400”,

… run it! … if no results go back and Write 6 where it says: “Minimum segment cM size to be included in total: (Must be at least 3 cm. Leave blank for default value = 7)”,

… run it again, … if no results go back and change it to 5, … if no results go back and lower to 4 or 3 and run it,

… if still no results go back, and add a 3 where it says: “Size (in SNPs) of Mismatch-Bunching limit. (Leave blank for default mismatch eval window / 2)” and run it again.

… good luck :) lol

… for example: me vs R1 … see the settings in the red squares that I had to use to get results with the 60 SNPs threshold.

[torzio]

I’m using MTA Deep Dive settings (60 SNPs) on GedMatch One-to-One, and trying to get a “minimum” result:

… on GedMatch “One-to-One Autosomal DNA Comparison”, input the Ancient Kit ID and Yours,

… Write 60 where it says: “SNP window size threshold. Leave blank for default to vary dynamically between 200-400”,

… run it! … if no results go back and Write 6 where it says: “Minimum segment cM size to be included in total: (Must be at least 3 cm. Leave blank for default value = 7)”,

… run it again, … if no results go back and change it to 5, … if no results go back and lower to 4 or 3 and run it,

… if still no results go back, and add a 3 where it says: “Size (in SNPs) of Mismatch-Bunching limit. (Leave blank for default mismatch eval window / 2)” and run it again.

… good luck :) lol

… for example: me vs R1 … see the settings in the red squares that I had to use to get results with the 60 SNPs threshold.

for myself .v. R1
all chr used except 3, 6, 9 and 12

Largest segment = 6.5 cM

Total Half-Match segments (HIR) 123.3cM (3.437 Pct)

33 shared segments found for this comparison.

648286 SNPs used for this comparison.

54.59 Pct SNPs are full identical

[torzio]

on min segment size of 5 ....i only get
Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs
19 .......7,663,317 ....... 9,939,831 .....6.5 .....560

[torzio]

@salento

you are closer than I for R1 ..........is this the same for MTA ?

I stated a while ago......looks like we came via dalmatia/liburnia area .........to Marche .....your line went south ( Picene and Daunian) and my line went north

something like SNP tracker

[Salento]

@salento
you are closer than I for R1 ..........is this the same for MTA ?
I stated a while ago......looks like we came via dalmatia/liburnia area .........to Marche .....your line went south ( Picene and Daunian) and my line went north
something like SNP tracker

… not on MTA anymore, you’re way closer to R1 than me, …

…though I do get the “Modern” MyHeritage Chieti (Abruzzo) Genetic Group (Martinsicuro is in Abruzzo)

[Salento]

… my Lecce Genetic Group has Marche (and Rome) in 1600 - 1650 … this genetic group is hundreds of years old, … maybe it’s a clue indicating a common genetic link of Piceni and Iapigi (Daunians - Peuceti - Messapi)
I Think :)

[torzio]

… my Lecce Genetic Group has Marche (and Rome) in 1600 - 1650 … this genetic group is hundreds of years old, … maybe it’s a clue indicating a common genetic link of Piceni and Iapigi (Daunians - Peuceti - Messapi)
I Think :)

this is my new #1 , replacing sample R1 .................but R1 has double the SNP's

[Salento]

​one-to-one R120 (Late Antiquity Roman) vs R850 (Ardea Latin) and 1543 (Imperial Roman)

[torzio]

It seems many are confused with which T it belongs to which branch
Currently
T1a1
T1a2
T1a3
T-PH110
are the branches
.................................
But some scientific testers use
T1a1a for T1a1
T1a1b for T1a2
T1a2a for T1a3


in the distant past 2011 to 2014 it was as the map below states
T2 = T1a1 branch

T3 = T1a2 branch