This is not serious Johane. Anyway, it's your strategy, but people are not stupid.
Seriously, now Mehmet Elezi is even a linguist.
http://www.respublica.al/2015/08/12...ik-“jeniçeri”-me-prapavijë-politike-që-kërkon
The only motivation to be so against introducing the infinitive into the standard is one based on provincialism.
This is very serious. I don't know if you have visited Kosova, Montenegro and Macedonian territories
and talked to any average person to understand in depth how much the '72 standard has failed them.
If your arguments about unity and fears of cantonization or separatist tendencies are sincere then it would be
wise to understand the urgency of not alienating a large majority of Albanians.
There are of course actors that will try use this to wedge and divide and conquer (as Sile is doing in this thread quite
transparently by first saying Tosk is true Albanian, and then trying to make Gheg some pure victim which he is trying to conserve)
but that does not make it any less necessary from a historical perspective. There is no actual argument against updating the standard
which has failed abysmally Albanians of Kosova, Macedonia and Montenegro. It is more dangerous to have the state speak in forms that
are so alien to a large majority of people that live in poverty, such that when certain
"preachers" or ideologues start popping up and start speaking
"shkurt e shqip" to them, it has an overabundance of potency.
If my motivation for this were on provincialism then I would be propagandizing that the subjunctive form should be eliminated entirely since it comes from
greek linguistic innovations, or that ancient greek used to have the infinitive also and therefore it is prestigious. I am not basing this on provincialism.
But I don't think the Tosk form of verb use should be removed. I think they are superior in certain respects as are Ghegs. I think that there is no actual argument
that can be made for not adding what already was part of the standard before the 72 one since it becomes a net positive.
The example with Faik Konica alone was good enough to make this point that its possible to have both.
The only slight argument you made about why the infinitive shouldn't be added was that you think its less suited to prose which linguistically is
no argument at all and holds no scientific merit. Get real on this Laberia.