Mait you loosing it . You are the one that said it was I2a1b found in west Europe (Treilles ) , and now you saying only thing we know it is I -P37.2 , are you arguing with yourself now?
I'm not arguing with myself, you just don't read, this is the first message I put in regards to this Neolithic I2a:
Then me and sparkey started discussing the possibility of this I2a1, he mentioned that it could be I2a1a based on the STR's, I did a quick search on Y-Search and the closest one was I2a2 (I2a1b), though this person was likely confused about his marker values and modern I2a1a is indeed the closest to this Neolithic I2a1, the problem here is that STR markers mutate, and this is a 5000 year old sample, I've seen bigger differences between 200 years, let alone 5000 years?Ohh and one more thing, haplogroup I2a1 was actually found in a Neolithic site in France that dates back to 5000 years ago:
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/20...00723108.short
Here's the data:
http://www.pnas.org/content/suppl/20...01100723SI.pdf
In other words, comparing ancient STR markers with modern STR markers is not really a good idea, only SNP's can determine what is and what isn't, and based on that, the samples are I2a1-P37.2, do you understand now?