Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum

View Poll Results: What is your cephalic index?

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • <65 (hyperdolichocephalic)

    0 0%
  • 65-75 (dolichocephalic)

    3 15.79%
  • 75-80 (mesocephalic)

    9 47.37%
  • 80 -85 (brachycephalic)

    4 21.05%
  • >85 (hyperbrachycephalic)

    3 15.79%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 55

Thread: What is your cephalic index?

  1. #26
    Banned Achievements:
    OverdriveThree FriendsVeteran10000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second Class

    Join Date
    06-06-11
    Posts
    2,651
    Points
    15,622
    Level
    37
    Points: 15,622, Level: 37
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 28
    Overall activity: 0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1a*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    HV1b2

    Country: Netherlands





    This message has been deleted by the poster
    Last edited by Goga; 27-11-11 at 23:57. Reason: removed a picture

  2. #27
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Carlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    26-09-11
    Posts
    1,589
    Points
    17,136
    Level
    39
    Points: 17,136, Level: 39
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 114
    Overall activity: 89.0%


    Ethnic group
    España
    Country: Spain



    18.5 cm of breadth and 23cm of length. My final score is 80,43 so that I am brachycephalic.

    Thanks to Iván for sending to me a small graphic example, which is what had to make the creator of the post and not to give for fact that anyone has the duty to know how the head has to measure itself to know the encephalic index.

  3. #28
    Satyavrata Achievements:
    Three FriendsRecommendation First ClassVeteran50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Maciamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    17-07-02
    Location
    Lothier
    Posts
    8,696
    Points
    697,304
    Level
    100
    Points: 697,304, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 27.0%


    Ethnic group
    Italo-celto-germanic
    Country: Belgium - Brussels



    Quote Originally Posted by Carlos View Post
    18.5 cm of breadth and 23cm of length. My final score is 80,43 so that I am brachycephalic.

    Thanks to Iván for sending to me a small graphic example, which is what had to make the creator of the post and not to give for fact that anyone has the duty to know how the head has to measure itself to know the encephalic index.
    I don't think you measured properly. 18.5 cm of head breadth seems quite high (unless you are hydrocephalic). The average is usually comprised between 13 and 16 cm. Did you use callipers ? What you could also try is to put two rigid rulers vertically against each side of your head (in front of the ears) and ask someone to take a third ruler and place it perfectly perpendicularly on top of your head. This should give you a more accurate width. The length is more difficult to measure due to the curvature of the head. Try standing head against a wall, place a ruler (or any flat, hard and inflexible object) horizontally against your forehead, and ask someone to measure the distance between the wall and the ruler (on both sides simultaneously if possible to make sure that it's perpendicular).
    My book selection---Follow me on Facebook and Twitter --- My profile on Academia.edu and on ResearchGate ----Check Wa-pedia's Japan Guide
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "What is the use of living, if it be not to strive for noble causes and to make this muddled world a better place for those who will live in it after we are gone?", Winston Churchill.

  4. #29
    Satyavrata Achievements:
    Three FriendsRecommendation First ClassVeteran50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Maciamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    17-07-02
    Location
    Lothier
    Posts
    8,696
    Points
    697,304
    Level
    100
    Points: 697,304, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 27.0%


    Ethnic group
    Italo-celto-germanic
    Country: Belgium - Brussels



    Quote Originally Posted by Goga View Post
    Due to privacy I made my face unrecognizable. But this is my head were we can see the shape of it and also my heavy jaw and a characteristic chin. I've got a very 'Kurdish (Iranic) look' if you ask me. My ancestors are from Northwest Kurdistan!
    It shows you face shape but not your head shape (profile). Just to be sure, what length did you measure ? Face length or head length (forehead to back of the head) ?

  5. #30
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Carlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    26-09-11
    Posts
    1,589
    Points
    17,136
    Level
    39
    Points: 17,136, Level: 39
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 114
    Overall activity: 89.0%


    Ethnic group
    España
    Country: Spain



    Quote Originally Posted by Maciamo View Post
    I don't think you measured properly. 18.5 cm of head breadth seems quite high (unless you are hydrocephalic). The average is usually comprised between 13 and 16 cm. Did you use callipers ? What you could also try is to put two rigid rulers vertically against each side of your head (in front of the ears) and ask someone to take a third ruler and place it perfectly perpendicularly on top of your head. This should give you a more accurate width. The length is more difficult to measure due to the curvature of the head. Try standing head against a wall, place a ruler (or any flat, hard and inflexible object) horizontally against your forehead, and ask someone to measure the distance between the wall and the ruler (on both sides simultaneously if possible to make sure that it's perpendicular).

    If it had taken badly the measurements, Ivan was wrong with the graph that he sent to me.
    From here I am grateful to Ivan for the inconveniences that one has taken. Ivan has sent to me another graph that I believe it is the correct one.

    My breadth is 18cm and the length 18´5cm therefore the result is 97´29

    I am again hyperbrachycephalic

  6. #31
    Banned Achievements:
    OverdriveThree FriendsVeteran10000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second Class

    Join Date
    06-06-11
    Posts
    2,651
    Points
    15,622
    Level
    37
    Points: 15,622, Level: 37
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 28
    Overall activity: 0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1a*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    HV1b2

    Country: Netherlands



    Quote Originally Posted by Maciamo View Post
    It shows you face shape but not your head shape (profile). Just to be sure, what length did you measure ? Face length or head length (forehead to back of the head) ?
    Hmm, thanks. I measured my face lenght. I looked at the mirror and it is almost the same as my face lenght, but I can't measure it by myself properly. Tonight I will ask somebody to measure my head, from "g." to ".op"


  7. #32
    Banned Achievements:
    OverdriveThree FriendsVeteran10000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second Class

    Join Date
    06-06-11
    Posts
    2,651
    Points
    15,622
    Level
    37
    Points: 15,622, Level: 37
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 28
    Overall activity: 0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1a*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    HV1b2

    Country: Netherlands



    Quote Originally Posted by Carlos View Post
    If it had taken badly the measurements, Ivan was wrong with the graph that he sent to me.
    From here I am grateful to Ivan for the inconveniences that one has taken. Ivan has sent to me another graph that I believe it is the correct one.

    My breadth is 18cm and the length 18´5cm therefore the result is 97´29

    I am again hyperbrachycephalic
    Lol, this is actually very funny. But why are you fooling around? Aren't you interested in the measurements of your own body? How tall you're etc.

    I know it's useless but I'm very curious and I want to know everything about myself.

  8. #33
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Carlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    26-09-11
    Posts
    1,589
    Points
    17,136
    Level
    39
    Points: 17,136, Level: 39
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 114
    Overall activity: 89.0%


    Ethnic group
    España
    Country: Spain



    Quote Originally Posted by Goga View Post
    Lol, this is actually very funny. But why are you fooling around? Aren't you interested in the measurements of your own body? How tall you're etc.

    I know it's useless but I'm very curious and I want to know everything about myself.

    Notice if I am interested that took the whole weekend measuring my head. I measure 1m 80cm. With the years probably I will be diminishing as all, by that time I already will not measure anything, until the last day, then they will be other peoples those who measure me.

    It seems to me entertaining to measure my head, but one would bore to measure a shelves.

  9. #34
    Banned Achievements:
    OverdriveThree FriendsVeteran10000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second Class

    Join Date
    06-06-11
    Posts
    2,651
    Points
    15,622
    Level
    37
    Points: 15,622, Level: 37
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 28
    Overall activity: 0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1a*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    HV1b2

    Country: Netherlands



    My head is 19.5 - 19.6 cm 'deep', lol. And between 14.2 - 14.4 cm wide.

    So my cephalic index = 14.5 : 19.5 x 100 = 74.36.

    So I've got a more average head than I thought.

    Btw, I'm going to delete my picture above, because it is useless now.

  10. #35
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Created Album pictures1 year registered1000 Experience Points
    himagain's Avatar
    Join Date
    29-10-11
    Location
    Samaria, Michigan
    Posts
    89
    Points
    1,913
    Level
    12
    Points: 1,913, Level: 12
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 237
    Overall activity: 0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    I1

    Ethnic group
    Germanic
    Country: USA - Michigan



    I find my head to be at the juncture between dolichocephalic and mesocephalic. My Y-DNA Haplotype is I1.

  11. #36
    Passione Mediterranea Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran25000 Experience Points
    julia90's Avatar
    Join Date
    24-09-10
    Location
    Florence-Prato
    Posts
    1,134
    Points
    40,630
    Level
    62
    Points: 40,630, Level: 62
    Level completed: 22%, Points required for next Level: 1,020
    Overall activity: 0%


    Ethnic group
    Tuscan-Italian-(European)
    Country: Italy



    I'm mesocephalic.. or slightly dolichocephalic.. even if in my family we have very different skull shapes (both dolicho and flat)

  12. #37
    Elite member Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    25-10-11
    Location
    Brittany
    Age
    70
    Posts
    4,382
    Points
    38,681
    Level
    60
    Points: 38,681, Level: 60
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 7.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H3c

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France



    I red a lot of funny things on this topic
    so (sorry for my english):
    1- physical features can be disconnected very quickly from Y-HGs a) in a small ancient population b) in a big population but with running males classes mating with female vanquished populations
    2- autsomal genes do not change too quickly, even compared to SNPs - it is the beings that change of autosomals (more seriously the répartition of autosomals can change from father and mother to children!)
    3- brachycephaly for caucasoids seams ahve appeared in mesolithic (about 8000/10000 years fago) - it was preceded by a slight tendency to mesocephaly during the last paleolithic if I do not mistake
    4- typical brachycéphaly is a genetic trait and if linked to life conditions it is a response of nature by mutated gene selection (pomotion) and not an "illness" or something like that - ancient anthropologists had proposed a theory based on a lack of 'iodine' selecting men or women that had this gene (or THESE geneS) - it is still to be explained for what I know - but nowaday (1950's) the brachycephalic or sub-brachycephalic populations are found also on the sea coasts and some mountainous inlands are very rich of dolichocéphalic people...
    5- the today populations of Europe had almost sure lost 2% in their cranial index compared to the 1930's - it seams to be linked to the increasing of stature
    6- I am not sure at all that Y-R1b rich populations are brachycephalic as a majority (even if A PART of Y-R1b bearers can have underwent this evolution (I think to the Alps) but it would signify that Y-R1b is much older in Western Europe that think a lot of people now ?-
    7- some scientists have proposed Cro-Magnon type as a possible ancestor to the 'alpine' type, it is not to say that all 'cromagnon' descendants have turned into bracycephalic people - evolution in times of small groups can go very fast for some traits (not for all of them)
    8- In Europe, there are some dolichocéphalic regions but they are a few number: (1930-40's):
    parts of Corsica (73-74), of Portugal (73-74-75), of Sardinia (73-74) but there is no big region under 76 - only Pathans, and some Arab tribes run about 72-73-74 - Irish people: 76-77 to 80-81 according to the regions, Wales 74-75 to 79-80 (-id-), Scotland 76-77 to 80-81, England 76-77 to 80-81 (last %: Bristol:Celts and Frenchies from Aquitania in the Middle Ages)
    means : Eire: 79-80, Scotland 78-79, Wales 78-79, England 77-78 - Spain 77-78, Portugal 76-77, Sweden 77-78 compared to Albania 87-88 and Saami 88-89 (they are very mixed nowaday: 83-84?), french Auvergne (86-87-88)

    in late French Mesolithic the IC index was running about 74-75, with some indiviuals about 78 - and it seams that the Neolithic mediterranean new incomers brought IC about 72, that was the rule previoulsy during the Paleolithic... in Central and North Europe 'brünn' type individually well determined was about 71-72 too, when 'cro-magnon' types was about 74-75

  13. #38
    Elite member Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    25-10-11
    Location
    Brittany
    Age
    70
    Posts
    4,382
    Points
    38,681
    Level
    60
    Points: 38,681, Level: 60
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 7.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H3c

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France



    I add that the limit of brachycephaly in the 1930's in an anthropological sense ("racial" phenotypes controlled on live people), on live, was between 84,9 and 85, hyperbrachycephaly after 90,0 ...
    the criteria here are for 'brachycrania' on skeletons (brachy: more than 80) but it indicates nothing about types: for I know, the most of the true intermediate crossings between 'alpine' types and dolichocephalic types was between 78 & 80 for skeletons, 80 & 82 on live (78-80 nowadays) - so CI 80 is more ondicative of mesocephaly than brachycephaly - yet in Iron Age Brittany (Western Aremorica) the means FOR CRANIA was 83 (85 live) and more for so called 'alpine' people (newcomers from Parisian Bassin) and they were not pure nevertheless -
    I put here a little post I did not long ago:

    Brachycephaly, bones metrics and evocations of environmental conditions :

    after a very too confident classical anthropology relying entirely or almost on cranial measures and funny interpretations, we know nowaday the domination of adaptative magic interpretations whose goal is to evacuate any worth of metrics. Science knows apparently the same mods as fashion trade...

    some basic facts : Europe SEAMS having known a trend towards brachycephaly since the Middle Ages until the 1900's ; someones saw the origin of brachycephaly in highlands (poor for 'iode'), in Great Europe at least, others saw in this process a general trend without any selective charactere (and without any explication too!) - in the last years, the debrachycephalization seams linked to stature encrease, as brachycephalization seamed linked to a decrease of stature*
    --*(Celts of La Tène Period : 1m67 (France Marne) to 1m 70 (Ireland), but Romans (nobility or not?): 1m62 – Germanic tribes of the Great Wanderings period : 1m72 to 1m74 – Bretons of Brittany and Frank or Norman riders from Normandy in the X°C., 1m70, Bretons of Brittain at the time 1m68 to 1m70 – French people around 1880 AC : 1m60-1m62, Swede Recrues same date : 1m68 only (1930 : France people : 1m65, Sweden 1m73)...
    Others facts : in an homogenous population for metric measures that could evolve not by mutations but by modifications linked to environment, we can expect a « bell » form for the statistic curve : for, say, a Cephal-Index of 82 in a population, we may expect a curve summit between the 81 and 83 indexes, the curve going down almost regularly on the two sides of it – but when we compare curves obtained for different populations showing very different C-I means, we see that the summit of the curve is excentred to the lowest indexes in the more dolichocephalic populations, and to the highest indexes in the more brachycephalic ones, whatever the period and the evolution of the means. We can see some secondary summits corresponding apparently to other expressions of the crossings and maybe to some « homozygotic pure » indexes...
    concerning environment+selection, Western Norway shows always more brachycephalic means than Eastern Norway, though it is in a sea coastal area. The context is mountainous but the population is as a whole living on the shores, so... ? As a whole too, the highest regions of Spain showed (in the XX°C.) the most dolichocephalic populations, the lowest the contrary ;
    One can say the acquisition and the lost of brachycephaly can require some time, and it is sure ! And I add that the first apparition of a trend towards meso-brachycephaly in Europe is old enough, dating from the Offnet-Solutré findings (10000BC-8000BC), and the Mugem findings (fewer brachycephalic men and when?) -
    concerning the increasing of brachycephalic between Antiquity and Middle-Ages, we have to rely on burying places studies : It is very hard to get a complete figure of Europe on this basis : I add that I am almost sure that the sepultures examined for barbarian Bronze Age or Iron Ages are for the most the sepultures of ruling castes, not the basic population ones : yet the Pompei population (near Napoli) of Roman times was sub-brachycephalic (big frequence of 'alpinid' types) and surely enough was more representative of the whole population of this country;
    some scientists seam taking the modifications of means in a same place according to times as a genuine purely local evolution : this bias is found very often ; I read in an Eupedia thread (old enough) a linked old scholar's text that explained with a very striking certitude that the diverses tribes living at antique times in Venetia was showing no modification with time (!), at the exception of a « modest » 75 to a nowaday (1930's?) 85 C-I change explained as a normal common all-european brachycephalic phenomenon !!! Very easy indeed ! No use in searching some historical fact (emigration, colonization, invasion, plague...) to explain modification... when some historic facts can trouble this kind of idyllic picture some authors sweap them as a fly on the table corner... (too few invaders, indapted invaders, 100% endogamy for centuries and centuries...) -
    When we look at the cranial evolution in France from Paleolithic to our era, we see different directions and different regional evolutions at different times : a seamingly genuine trend towards mesocephaly 74 >> 76 (everywhere in occident) and after brachycephaly >> + > 82 (in Alps for the most) among cromagnoids descendants, at the Mesolithic period and in Neolithic, the apparition of small light boned « mediterraneans » of more than a type more dolichocephalic (72) intruding among the previous population – in Brittany, stayed at the tail concerning brachycephalization, we see a set of different sub-dolichocephals taking one on another at Megalithic times, beginning the true brachycephalization by the wives mediation at the Eneolithic/Chalcolithic ages, the bulk of men-women brachycephalization taking place at the Iron Ages ; everytime, the propagation (in no mountains zones!!!) appears as coming from East (Parisian Bassin) ; no internal local brachycephalization here ; the rural folk of 1950's Brittany still showed cantons oppositions for C-I as for other phenotypical traits (running from 79 to 86, the most brachycephalic in the eastern « gallo(roman » cantons as a whole – GIOT) -
    I do not eliminate the way-of-living-environment aspect at all but I know it can not offer us all the keys of brachy-debrachycephalization ; by instance, a survey on the same(???) departements (cantons are parts of departments, these last ones being more unprecise for surveys) some 15 years later show a debrachycephalization more or less tiny in Brittany, Poitou, Anjou, Maine and Normandy (10 departements of a region that contains 16 but Brittany complete here) with a decrease of C-I running from 0,5 to 2,0 according to the places (someones can be suspected of strong immigration of other french people, others having a faster or slower life-level evolution due to economic orientations and rural emigration) – Here yet, debrachycephalization was associated to stature increase – so the last Middle Ages « mechanical » and not genetic part of brachycephalization until the industrial revolution in Europe could be seen like stature decrease as the result of (agricultural) sedentarization associated with « worst » feeding (less meat?), harder works in pre-adolescence times before the skeleton would have been formed, more short inbreeding... But do not forget that brachycephals was already numerous at bronze-Iron Ages in some parts of Europe, and that civil cemeteries of these periods showed certainly more level folks than the cheftains sepultures of previous times. Keep in mind too that even in an ancient population of 35 Frisian of Leeuwarden showing a mean C-I of 78,26 you find 1 indiviual with the C-I of 88, and 1 of 85 and 2 of 84 compared to 10 under 77 ! Poor bad feed brachycephals or mountain climbers ? In the same family you can find a dolicho and a brachy so : evident genetic background too.
    So without any proof, how can we imagine brachycephaly could take place ? The adaptative aspect
    can have two aspects : a personal during-life adaptation by plastical adaptative variability furnished by the genome, not genetically acquired and not transmittable to following generations and a collective genetic long term adaptation by selection keeping the most adapted genes : the ones that improve survival in some natural conditions and that are linked to some cranial features, either creating them or indirectly linked to them in the genome ; I see this evolution as acquired and dificult to loose, only by an other selective factor -


    What is striking is that in Europe we see a kind of brachycephaly taking place pace by pace (result : 'alpine type') in West and an other type of brachycephalic coming on sight abruptly enough in West and East and Centre, at the Eneolithic-Chalcolithic time :
    a Survey about Greece(PANAGIARIS 1993 according to DIENEKE) speaks about apparition of brachycephalic people at the bronze Ages in Greece (Pelopponese), Creta, and in eastern Saka-land (people came from Pamir-Ferghana), excluding a phenomenon by population isolation in Greece proper – some prototypes of a future dinaric type appeared too in central-northwestern Europe about 3000 BC : I am unaware of the precise place of very first apparition of types on this direction ; for some old scientists the first apparition of dinarid types in Anatolia—South-Caucasus is about the 2000 BC or a few centuries before, coming from the Balkans as they thought... I red too that the Kurgan culture of southern Russia showed a majority of dolichocephals, the most of high stature but not all of them (the smallest : some « danubian mediterraneans »?), and too some brachycephals, more on the dinaroid side ; these last types was found also very far, in light proportions, among steppic populations of south Siberia in a considered future I-E population. Whatever people can conclude of it, some of the present day populations of these areas show a majority of Y-R1a (as in ancient times) and Y-I2a1a + some Y-I2a2 not yet detected in ancient Y-DNA (but the story is not closed) : I say we have there an open door, not an answer...
    I am still tempted to see in the territory of Cucuteni-Pripolje cultures the place where East Anatolian or Near-Eastern farmers or pastors (Y-G2 + some Y-J2?) mixed with Balkans-Carpathians « autochtones » (Y-I2...? + some Y-E1b « alpha » ?) developping a high standard culture (on material criteria) before getting in touch with steppic tribes (Y-R1a +???).
    Whatsoever the conditions that gave birth to the so called « dinaric » phenotype : selection on a certain genetic basis or mixture on an as certain genetic basis, these conditions seam yet to me linked geographically to central-eastern Europe (from mesolithic times ? or is it the admixture with neolithic people ? I have no answer for now... but the metric surveys over the Carpathian Bassin are recent enough : Chalcolithic ? And a survey by R. PINHASI & M. PLUCIENNIK (2004) about mesolithic to neolithic sites in southern Europe and Near-East-Anatolia did not furnish C-I data, telling only that the Khirokitia (Creta) neolithic population showed a peculiar « short-headness and paedomorphic features » - first meso-brachycephals there, but when exactly ???


  14. #39
    Banned Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    23-04-11
    Posts
    606
    Points
    12,653
    Level
    34
    Points: 12,653, Level: 34
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 697
    Overall activity: 0%


    Country: United States



    dolichocephalic, i assume based on what I know about my facial structure.

  15. #40
    Elite member Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    25-10-11
    Location
    Brittany
    Age
    70
    Posts
    4,382
    Points
    38,681
    Level
    60
    Points: 38,681, Level: 60
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 7.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H3c

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France



    if correct, a cephalic index of 80,43 is not brachycephalic but mesocephalic:
    you confuse or rather has been mistaken by some imprecise text: 'brachycephalic' is said of CRANIA of over CI 80: two observatios: it doesn' t take in account the true europeoid means and it concerns measures taken on dead man crania (bone only)
    alive, a CI of 80 would be rather 81-81,5 and in standards of 1930-50 Europe it's still mesocephalic, subbrachycephaly beginning about 84 -
    it's true that the ancient crania means were more around the 77-78 in Europe ON CRANIA, before demic encrease of some already brachyccephalic populations (or encrease of the number of their discovered buryings!!!)
    today populations seem having lost 2 to 2,5 in their CI compared to 1950 standards, roughly... but keap in mind Auvergne and some french Alps or Jura regions shew in 20°Cy CIs of 86 to 88, and S-Albania (Tosques) 89!!! that's brachycephaly!
    just for precision, not mentioning questions of measures

  16. #41
    Elite member Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    25-10-11
    Location
    Brittany
    Age
    70
    Posts
    4,382
    Points
    38,681
    Level
    60
    Points: 38,681, Level: 60
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 7.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H3c

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France



    Sorry for this answer to Carlos which falls a bit lately! after the long text I already wrote before!

  17. #42
    Elite member Achievements:
    OverdriveThree Friends5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Hauteville's Avatar
    Join Date
    28-11-14
    Posts
    824
    Points
    9,097
    Level
    28
    Points: 9,097, Level: 28
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 253
    Overall activity: 0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    I-S185
    MtDNA haplogroup
    U5b2b

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: Italy



    My cephalic index is 78 and i was classified as Atlanto Mediterranean in an italian page of anthro.

  18. #43
    Advisor Achievements:
    VeteranThree Friends50000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second Class
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    15,339
    Points
    281,799
    Level
    100
    Points: 281,799, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.6%


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York



    I don't remember, but I know it came out mesocephalic, which surprised me, as I suppose I conflated "large" with a high cephalic index. (My head is embarrassingly big, I will confess...just like my Dad, who always wore the largest men's hat size...thank God for lots of long hair and that I don't have to worry about balding. ) The closest country was Slovenia. I have no idea what that means. (I used Dienekes' calculator.)


    Non si fa il proprio dovere perchè qualcuno ci dica grazie, lo si fa per principio, per se stessi, per la propria dignità. Oriana Fallaci

  19. #44
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    28-02-10
    Posts
    263
    Points
    7,033
    Level
    24
    Points: 7,033, Level: 24
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 17
    Overall activity: 13.0%


    Ethnic group
    Croatian
    Country: Croatia



    My CI is 81

  20. #45
    Banned Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    23-04-11
    Posts
    606
    Points
    12,653
    Level
    34
    Points: 12,653, Level: 34
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 697
    Overall activity: 0%


    Country: United States



    My head is somewhat round, but what's most distinct is the back of my head is almost completely flat, which is something I have seen only in Balkan people.

  21. #46
    Elite member Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    25-10-11
    Location
    Brittany
    Age
    70
    Posts
    4,382
    Points
    38,681
    Level
    60
    Points: 38,681, Level: 60
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 7.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H3c

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France



    Quote Originally Posted by Maciamo View Post
    That makes you dolicocephalic, close to hyperdolicocepahlic. If you measured properly you fit in the minority for Iranian peoples.Here are the scientific studies I know about Iranians :

    Morphological Evaluation of Head in Turkman Males in Gorgan-North of Iran, Golalipur et al. (2007)

    Out of 198 young Turkman males tested, 8% were dolicocephalic, 40% mesocephalic, 42.5% brachycephalic and 7.5% hyperbrachycephalic.


    Cephalometry in 14-18 Years Old Girls and Boys of Shiraz-Iran High School, Vojdani et al. (2009)

    They measured the head shape of 867 girls and 960 boys. Among the boys there were 7.5% of dolicocephalic, 28.5% of mesocephalic, 30% of brachycephalic and 34.5% of hyperbrachycephalic. The girls only had 4.8% of dolicocephalic types.


    In both studies (North and South Iran), the brachycephalic type is overwhelming. So perhaps your ancestry is not purely Iranic.
    VERY LATE ANSWER FOR VERY OLD POST

    I red not long ago a study aboutcephalic index among populations of Iran. I was amazed by the resultsof these studies compared to older ones made between 50 and 70 yearsago. Not only by the results of measures but by the conclusions aboutthem.
    Before the 1950's, the Iran mean for CIwas about 76-< 78 at most. Some regions (a central spot) shew CI'sof 84-85 but the more common means were regions with 73 to < 77plus some regions with 82 to < 84, these last ones in North, that's to say south the Caspian and in South. It's true these means arebased on geographical maps without ethnic specifications, what couldmask some differences.
    Concerning ethnic groups, I red theCI's for Parsi in India were about 82-83...
    the recent survey of M.J. Golalipour onSouth Caspian Pars(i) and Turkmen females of 17-20 years age found CI82,8 for 203 Turkmen females and CI 85,0 for 207 Pars females ;the first result is not astonishing, see above, but the 85 for Parsseems very high, compared to the CI of 75,0 found in past in Teheran,and the 81,20 found elsewhere, and the 80,8 found among Gujaratis -
    this other results, more ancient it'strue, show that the global mean was surely about the 78 when we see(saw) CI's of 75/76 among mots of the I-Ean Afghans, and 72/73 amongthe Pathans of Pakistan...
    &: uneasy to extrapolate from socontradictory means – we know already there were geographic andethnic differences within Iran (I don't know the CI for Lurs/Luri,maybe close to first Tadjiks?) - I think the fragmentation of thepopulation in numerous subpopulations or clans is a cause of possibledrifts (small stocks for endogamy) ; left aside theenvironment-climatic effects, in a generally dolichocephalic orbrachycephalic small population (« matings circle ») thedrift is light enough and conduct to an exageration of the dominanttrait – but as I say, IC's of 82 are not brachycephalic, but aremesocephalic in the sense of possible crossing between two extremes –and then a first large group of people about the 80-83 can remainstable as long as the matings concern the whole population, but ifsmall groups of same previous mean population migrate and goeveryone its way, drift can oppose after a few generations IC's of76/78 and others of 84-97 easily enough... and we (readers) don'tknow the way of mating of some clans : endogame, exogame ???
    I think even the today iranic speakingpopulation of Iran is not of the very same origin according toregions : someones more autochtonous and I-Ean accultured, othermore steppic ancient Iranians (even the steppic I-Eans are far to bea one stem descendance)... For Kurds an ancient study spoke of 3populations with CI's of more than 84/85 and 1 sub-dolichocephalicbut I've not the localizations.
    Concerning environment-way-of-lifeimpact, I very strongly doubt they can produce a change of 5-6 indexin two generations !
    &: I would be very glad if thepapers about metric anthropologic would specify some indexes andabsolute measures concerning the ancient populations supposed to beenvolved in the I-Ean story, and not only the personal conclusions ofauthors, but...
    +
    'borreby' is a recent term of classification (taxinomy), not too precise in fact, BUT refers to a crania found in Borreby village, Denmark if I recall well, - i'm not sure it was Paleolithical, rather late-mesolithical I think - I' ll try to find the correct date -


  22. #47
    Elite member Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    25-10-11
    Location
    Brittany
    Age
    70
    Posts
    4,382
    Points
    38,681
    Level
    60
    Points: 38,681, Level: 60
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 7.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H3c

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France



    Damned!
    I never found any precise date for Borreby's skull!!!
    but from what I red it seems this crania is not older than the Eneolithic or Neolithic-Chalcolithic transition in Northern Europe - so not autochtonous but the (maybe crossed with strong 'brünn' accretions) member of early Bell Beakers advance there? I lack archeologic precise works but it seems Bell beakers and other Beakers colonized Scandinavia at these times or very short time after (early Bronze) -
    the today 'borreby's types present two tendancies: a more cromagnoid form, with middle-low skull, broad square face with very broad lower jaw, evovled skull lines and weak enough browridges, small orbits, and a more brünnoïd type, with very receding front, very strong browridges and less broad lower jaw, spite it's heavy too, larger orbits - the brachycephaly (limited in some part) of these type adress the question of a crossing or an internal process: but the cromagnoid phylum that produced certainly 'alpine' type can explain the first borreby type - in Norway, when the more rugged more brutal secod type seems dominating, the brachycephaly diminish so... the frist "gentle" type (but robust!!!) appears to me as a fidele duplication of the Hvellinge crania of the same periods in Skane, near Malmö (see peter LARSSON Swede footballer born 1961 Nässjö) -
    all the way, all that seems confirming brachycephaly is not too old in Scandinavia and can be linked to external influences, Saami being newcomers too -

  23. #48
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    25-02-14
    Posts
    213
    Points
    7,226
    Level
    25
    Points: 7,226, Level: 25
    Level completed: 36%, Points required for next Level: 324
    Overall activity: 0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b1a2a1a1b3
    MtDNA haplogroup
    HV

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: Italy



    I found an old calculator by Dienekes, it requires various skull mesaurements, one of them is the cephalix index, it's 77.5 in my case (mesocephalic). It says I'm "proto-europoid"
    Nullum magnum ingenium mixtura dementiae fuit.

  24. #49
    Elite member Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    25-10-11
    Location
    Brittany
    Age
    70
    Posts
    4,382
    Points
    38,681
    Level
    60
    Points: 38,681, Level: 60
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 7.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H3c

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France



    Quote Originally Posted by Mars View Post
    I found an old calculator by Dienekes, it requires various skull mesaurements, one of them is the cephalix index, it's 77.5 in my case (mesocephalic). It says I'm "proto-europoid"

    proto-europoid, inded!?!

    in fact so a CI can be the evolution of a type (hypothesis) OR the crossing between two very different types but with a predominance of the more dolichocephalic -
    I've no proof but after personal observations, it seems to me skulls can take very various and opposed and astonishing forms through crossings, it could prove that more than a genes pair is involved in the genotype - that doesn't exclude that more common forms show very more often in a population, according to "pure" types or mixed types numerically dominant.
    so meso or subdolichocephaly can be the result of ONE type or of MORE than ONE type - a diagnostic implies other measurements and shape observations (left aside possible deformations by disease) -
    as a whole, on CRANIA, all the means from Paleolithic to early Neolithic in Europewere under 75, the most between 71 and 74 - EXCEPT in the Alps and Jura were roughly some 82-84 were found since the 6000 BC -
    the first mediterranean Neolithic men shew as a whole CI's of 72-73 as means, and the so called braycephals of Mugem were fornt-to-rear compressed skulls, their supposed true Ci's being mesocephal rather than brachycephal (and yet we have to take inaccount the terminology for SKULLS where 80 is already considered as "brachy"...
    the Cro-Magnon phylum shew a tendancy towards sub-dolichocephaly, with means of 73 to less than 75 - constant enough -

    &: when we find CI's about the 77-80 on crania, whe have to examine the shapes and compare the middle element to the other elements: is it an homogenous serie of skulls between 77/80 or only a MEAN with extremes form say 68 to 94??? (it exists!!!)
    in SOM late Neolithic there were 'mediterranean' skulls very recognizible for shapes, found too in caves of the southern France Causses, about the 72-73, brachy's about 83-84 or more, with easily identifiable 'alpine' shapes, and , among the meso's, a serie of very "brutally shaped" skulls; named 'sequanian' type:

    someones thought it was a naturally mesocepahlic type for its peculiar shapes - possible, but i rather think it 's a dominently 'brünnoid-capelloid' type (remnants of Hunters-Gatherers as among Michelsberg culture) with a slight accretion of 'alpine' or cromagnoid on way to 'alpine', already present on the France soils : my 'borreby-B' in formation??? -
    all this to say: we can inheritate our C-I from genetically homogenous or heterogneous sources, and we have to take in account the time or the generation which is ours, to try to calculate the effects of way of life and environment.

  25. #50
    Banned Achievements:
    Tagger Second Class1000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Parafarne's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-04-17
    Age
    34
    Posts
    96
    Points
    1,550
    Level
    10
    Points: 1,550, Level: 10
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 300
    Overall activity: 4.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R
    MtDNA haplogroup
    Eurasian

    Ethnic group
    Caucasian
    Country: Afghanistan



    Mine is CI=84 and my language is Persian. I should do more checks coz its very hard!
    Last edited by Parafarne; 02-09-18 at 05:01.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Food maturity index by country
    By Maciamo in forum Other Serious Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-05-17, 15:31
  2. Corruption perception index 2009
    By ^ lynx ^ in forum Other Serious Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 30-09-10, 09:01
  3. Failed states index 2009.
    By ^ lynx ^ in forum Politics & Governments
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 21-04-10, 11:51
  4. Brussels tops European competitiveness index
    By Maciamo in forum European Economy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26-11-06, 19:25

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •