edao
Elite member
The media are incredibly shallow, they go on about the veto and a marginalised UK, but they haven't actually discussed what the veto was all about. The EZ are trying to put in place measures to insure that the Financial Services industry pays 'insurance' on the possibility of any future crisis. The UK see this as a threat to the City and have said no, but what exactly is the UK's position on stopping or providing for future financial collapses?
If the average UK voter understood what the financial transaction tax was and what vetoing it actualy meant I'm sure most would be pretty angry at the Conservatives stance. Currently the UK has no say on the future of Europe but has an open door to countires like Spain so all the 20% unemployed are coming here making it even harder for UK workers to get a job. It's total insanity your either all in or all out, sooner UK get the boot the better.
If the average UK voter understood what the financial transaction tax was and what vetoing it actualy meant I'm sure most would be pretty angry at the Conservatives stance. Currently the UK has no say on the future of Europe but has an open door to countires like Spain so all the 20% unemployed are coming here making it even harder for UK workers to get a job. It's total insanity your either all in or all out, sooner UK get the boot the better.