that is the problem, you can not combine Pelasgians (sea people) with an epipaleolithic remnant in a mountain area, Pelasgians were intruders in Balkans, not paleolithic or neolithic habitants,
Pelasgians enter after IE and before troyan war,
in Ilias homers names them as Ethiopeans Αιθιωψ.
that means that until Troyan war they were in kind of seperation with IE,
there is no Neolithic evidence of E HG people except Spain in the rest of Europe,
but there is the Cyprus and the Konya that fits with all written histories and Myths, and all genetical scientific conclusions.
better find who were the Pelasgians, from where they came and where they went, and left behind them,
J2 is older than E in Balkans,
maybe older than any IE R1 that is why we find the Aryan elements in Greek and Thracian languages,
and that is that creates the question of IE as a Neolithic agriculture language or as steppe Bronze age language,
to understand that search Varna Necropolis,
gold mettalurgy and burial rituals exist in Balkans still today,
and they are much before bronze IE, meaning that Masks of Thracians and Myceneans was not a teppe culture but a Balkanic one,
the body position in intermediate kingdom follows that also, meaning that Varna affected even Egypt,
all Kurgans are much later than Varna, so we see that Balkans learn Kurgan people to use gold in burial rituals,
considering that the oldest Kurgan is in Syria but archaiologists found it much after then might speak about a J2 population that existed in Neolithic Balkans
E in Balkans can not be neolithic for 2 reasons,
1) if is Neolithic in Spain then it should found in France Italy swiss Slovenia Austria Croatia etc.
but it is not, on the other hand it is found in minor Asia and Greece which surely is tied with Crucciani estimation,
2) early Neolithic people were G2, isolation of Swiis mountains surely helped G2 to survive the later incoming tribes, if E came from spain why did not create a pocket in Alps? or in North Italy? or in Dinaric Alps or in Tatra and Transylvania?
(the map you show us is definetly clear that E from spain has nothing to do with Balkanic E, instead the existance in Portugal shows a Levantine connection (Phoenician colonise Portugal in antigue time)
3) the mother land of an Hg is the land that has the more diversities,
How many diversities have Albanian E considering with other Blaknic E and with Levant where probably had a founder effect?
When and where that founder effect happened?
Hg do not follow hydraulic laws neither political desires.
4) Both Armenian Hypothseis (Thracians) and Greco-Aryan can be explained with an Anatolian connection of IE and J2 populations as also with R1b (M21 if I remeber correct)
but they can also be explained if we consider Balkans as homelend of R1,
the diversities of R1a in Balkans are indeed many, but until today that is consider to happened as a sink phenomena and not as motherland ( I heard it from Macciamo),
although the case of Sesklo Varna Vinca shows a connection ( The case of pommerania is still a question if being connected with Vinca or with IE)
the key is the Varna Necropolis, which I bet had I1 and J2 population and misses R1b R1a
or has R1b and R1a and misses J2, but surely misses E
the problem is that 6700 years old radiocarbon estimation does give very reliable results.
but we see that burial customs with Gold, with hands croossed and the weapons-scepters was not an egyptian custom neither a steppe one but a Balcanic one,
that burial chamber tumulus-kurgan was an anatolian-Near-middle-East custom,
a good question for you,
if E Y-DNA in Albania is neolithic? and they vanquish in thin air from spain to kossovo? what about their female population? the mtDNA that mate with them?
IE as we know took the women from the locals,
but mtDNA that can could coperate with E is found in an arc from Spain to Lapland scan, almost misses rest Europe and the in Balkans,
I wonder how come Neolithic population get married? so Neolithic E Hg of Kossovo people storage their women where?
why you don't search and that?
if E hg in kossovo was neolithic then it should have also the mtDNA that fits with it? at least in perfect % analogy. does it?
why should we consider kossovo an exception from the rule?
I mean if in Europe bronze people took the women of local neolithic, then same should happened in kossovo, meaning that if kossovo E-V13 was neolithic the mt-DNA should also be from Africa or Levant but in bigger % cause some of the women were taken by IE R1a and R1b. meaning that in Kossovo we must have above 60% African or Levantine mt-DNA.
Do we?
plz answer that question?