Knovas
Regular Member
- Messages
- 1,443
- Reaction score
- 85
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Spain
- Ethnic group
- Catalan
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- I2a1a*
- mtDNA haplogroup
- K1b1a
You broke several rules and you got infractions. And no, you can't disagree because you don't have an opinion: your point is saying Iberians have African admixture when you see the smallest oportunity to do so (now for example, with ridiculous scores such as 0.1% and misinterpreting the componenets at your convenience). So a person with no Iberian ancestry is talking recurrently about this using the methods described above.When it all comes down to it, Mainland Italians barley have any admixture. And yeah, I've been warned, so what? It's not like I'm breaking any rules. You just don't like people who disagree with you. Do you think you scare me?
There you are another example which proves you are t.r.o.l.l.i.n.g.
If Southern Italy and Sicily are less African, then how is it possible to obtain figures like this?And yes, Southern Italy/Sicily are much less African than Spain. Especially mainland Southern italy.
Spain: 1% Egyptian and 6% NA
General Italy: 6.1% Egyptian and 1.4% NA
If what you say is true (which is obviously not and you know it), then the figures should be lower for Italy, and they are not. So Southern Italy and Sicily are less African according to you, and you intentionally ignore the fact that added to Italy as whole makes the general Italian sample more African than Spain. And this without taking into account East Med and Arabian.
The only thing I can say is: thanks for clarifying your agenda, you'll make the task fairly easy.
+1 Kardu