2,500 year old tattoos of a Siberian princess

nobody



Those tattoos are linked with primitive accupuncture. They match accupuncture points for conditions that otzi suffered from.

http://www.archaeologiemuseum.it/en/node/262

Makiamo

first you shamelessly try to put the Celtic spin on a proof that "celtic" art is not celtic but Skitian and then you desperately try to link it to r1b.



Then when you are proven wrong, you just lump it into Indo European basket where all the things that don't suit your sad old R1b celtic theory go. If something proves that what is considered celtic art is not actually celtic and that celts were not R1b it has to be Indo European so by extention celtic and r1b.



What is amazing is the length to which you guys here go to preserve your R1b celtic fairy tale...


by the way have a look at traditional croatian tattoos from croatia and bosnia. They are surely not r1b but I2 + r1a...

View attachment 5886


follow links for more pictures

http://www.geni.com/projects/Tradicionalne-hrvatske-tetovaže-Traditional-Croatian-tattoos/8331

It wasn't that outlandish, there is a broad link between r1b and Indo European (and there is the shared ancestry of many people), what is the celtic fairy tale you speak of (I know you wrote of an entire branch of languages based on a pre Indo European civilisation)?
How do you know that those tattoos you linked to aren't r1b
 

This thread has been viewed 19622 times.

Back
Top