The bold is from fenni papers, not my words.
I have nothing against albanians, I just present the fact as written by neutrals...many neutrals.
What's neutral about presenting Albanians as Gyspies? And "many neutrals" have proven that Albanians are not different from the rest of IE Europeans. Nothing special about the Albanian genetic makeup, that's the final consensus
I present written history which has a logical continuation.....you present illogical fact. If you present logical fact and its continuous , I would believe.
Arbëresh meaning Christian Albanian = that's what Italians say, what they called albanians in Italy.
There's nothing logical about what you just said. Being described as Christian is not the same thing as "means Christian". All Albanians were Christian in the Middle Ages. There are Christians in Albania, they're not called Arbëresh. The continuity between Arbëresh (Medieval Albanains) and Shqiptar (Contemporary Albanians) is documented, the only illogical claim in here is yours. What did Italians call the Albanians who remained in Albania? Was there a different name? And you still didn't answer what's the name of Jewish Albanians? Surely a society that has a specific name for Christians must have one for other groups.
I have said, show me this text by ptolemy about the albanoi.....
I asked you a question, only you, and you just lumped me with everybody else. That's extremely offensive to me. You quoted my text, so I expect you to answer only my questions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q&A time:
My last questions was, that tosks are albanians that have been in albanian the longest and I asked who and where they derive from.
That's where the majority of minorities live. Vlach, Greek, "Macedonian", even 80% of the Jevg and Gabel minorities you like to associate Ghegs. There are subgroups of Tosks: "Northern Tosks" (no specific name), Labs, Chams...Any study that separates Tosks from Labs or Chams it's not worth reading. If it gets the definition wrong [ i.e Labs=Tosk, Chams=Tosk, Arvanita (in Greece)=Tosk, Arbëresh (in Italy)=Tosk], it's not worth it. If you want to find something, try separating Tosks in the subgroups they call themselves. The only requirement of separating Albanains in different groups is the language not the religion.
lastly - I find it very puzzling that after Rome took macedonia ( and albania , greece and epirus) in 146BC, that Roman surveyors found no reference to anyone similar or named albanians. The romans sent surveyors to mountainous areas to search for metals.
EDIT; The only arbanon I found was in bulgarian historial maps of the 11th century, it was located...west of lake Ohrid and in the upper part of Shkumbin river
The first Albanian state. Founded by Progon. You might want to search about Albanian principalities, they were not all called Arbanon, only this one. Other names were Muzakaj, Kastrioti, Dukagjini...those are the ones in the tip of my tongue right now. Arbanon/Albania apparently was the name that stuck, kinda like Goguryeo and Korea (Hanguk).
If you want to know, even the Albanian language wasn't called Arbëresh or anything similar in at least the 14th-15th century. Frang Bardhi, who wrote the first Latin-Albanian dictionary called it...Latinium-Epiroticum. There was no (recorded) controversy on the name when it was published as far as I know, so to all members here, don't start now 6 centuries later, I'm just presenting the things as they are.
Names simply change a lot. There are a lot of names referring to Albanians and I listed some of them. Try not to confuse them with the 3.09% minorities, or Vlachs or others.