Alright so its been a few days since i posted this thread, and there hasn't been any reply, so i decided to take matters into my own hands and try to compile the most accurate frequency chart i could, with the available information on the web.
Lower Normandy | R1b | 71% | I | 24% | (I1a) | 12% | E1b1b1 | 0% | J | 2%
| G | 1% | R1a | 2% |
Sources:
I-
www.ncbi.nlm.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1181996/. Also used Ftdna Normandy Y-dna project to reference these findings, Study was in 3 percent of what article stated.
R1b- Took a head count of Participants in Normandy Y-dna Project ( I used this as only a way to see a more accurate number, Hap maps were the main tool used), and referenced numerous articles on western France's genetic make up to corroborate the findings.
E1b1b1- Genforum.Geneaology.com/stafford/messages/5030.html, also looked at the Hap map on eupedia and used the Normandy Ydna project at Ftdna, although on participant tested for it, the percentage was still less than 1 percent.
J- Based findings off Hap maps, but also referenced the Normandy Y-dna project to try to find a more accurate number.
R1a_ Based findings off Hap maps, but also referenced the Normandy Y-dna project to try to find a more accurate number.
G- Hard to find articles/studies on G in Lower Normandy so there is a margin of error on this one, but i did not find any tangible evidence other than Hap Maps that show a >1 percent frequency in Normandy.
Other Comments: The Ftdna Normandy Y-dna project was not used solely for any findings, only as a reference to justify other claims. The reason i say this is that a few participants in the study may not have held Y lines back to Normandy, and most of the participants were immigrants and not people living in the region, but rather their descendents. Feel free to comment, critisize or offer any discussion on my findings.