Good info. Also this article contradicts alot of claims of neolithic arrivals for T and K, but is consistent with paleothic origins on the others, except of course for J, which seems to be a pretty sure fire marker of a Neolithic expansion.
Forum | Europe Travel Guide | Ecology | Facts & Trivia | Genetics | History | Linguistics |
Austria | France | Germany | Ireland | Italy | Portugal | Spain | Switzerland |
![]() |
Father's Mtdna H95a1
Grandfather Mtdna T2b24
Great Grandfather Mtdna T1a1e
GMother paternal side YDna R1b-S8172
Mother's YDna R1a-Z282
Good info. Also this article contradicts alot of claims of neolithic arrivals for T and K, but is consistent with paleothic origins on the others, except of course for J, which seems to be a pretty sure fire marker of a Neolithic expansion.
Interesting, new outlook on some of thes Mtdna's, I still have trouble with K though, because a lot of people claim that it (or one of its clades) is related to the Jewish diaspora, seems to be a hazy one if you ask me. But its still interesting that they believe K to be the same age and relative origin as V(both 17000 years old, and southern European).
Only K1a1b1a, K2a2a, and K1a9, imply signals of Jewish ancestry. The vast majority of K subclades in Europe have nothing to do with this .
According to this study http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/28418-MtDNA-J-amp-T-colonised-Europe-from-the-Near-East-in-the-late-Paleolithic-amp-Mesolithic also hg J is older in Europe than previously thought.