Most I1 in Europe is not from Germans or Nordics

I have done the Big Y and transferred my BAM file to Yfull. I'm I1a and my terminal was dated ca 1450 years old!
 
According Serbian DNA project (sample for now is 992 individuals):

Serbs; I1 = 9,17%

It is even more than Maciamo found in scientific papers (8,5%)

...
Small part I1 in Serbia and generally Balkans origin from Goths, Gepids, Heruls, Longobards.

I1 was in Balkans earlier, scientists will research, we will see new studies.
 
The original Germanic speakers were clearly R1b, although I think it wouldn't be unreasonable to suggest that the spread of R1b and I1 is related to Germanic expansion.
 

If you dont know shit about Uralic-Finnic or Germanic origins you should shut up and stop spreading lies.


This forums if full of ignorant people, here are some links again, I have doubts if you can read them based on your writings.


What do we know about the prehistory of languages and cultures in areas, such as Northern Europe that do not have written documents or large extinct cities? For decades, archaeology and linguistics, two disciplines weaving together multiple interdisciplinary aspects have fostered a dialogue focusing on cultural and linguistic networks, mobility and contacts between people. This book sheds new light on cultural diffusion and language change in prehistoric Northern Europe with special emphasis on the northern Baltic Sea area. The rise of agriculture, identification of new cultural waves in terms of language are topics that outline the early prehistory in the North. The book contains twelve articles by linguists and archaeologists, evidence drawn from various Finno-Ugric and Indo-European languages, and up-to-date insights into the research of prehistoric Northern Europe.




Riho Grünthal: Introduction: an interdisciplinary perspective on prehistoric Northern Europe [PDF]
Mika Lavento: Cultivation among hunter-gatherers in Finland – evidence of activated connections? [PDF]
Charlotte Damm: From Entities to Interaction: Replacing pots and people with networks of transmission [PDF]
Luobbal Sámmol Sámmol Ánte (Ante Aikio): An essay on Saami ethnolinguistic prehistory [PDF]
Asko Parpola: Formation of the Indo-European and Uralic (Finno-Ugric) language families in the light of archaeology: Revised and integrated 'total' correlations [PDF]
Tiit-Rein Viitso: Early Metallurgy in Language: The History of Metal Names in Finnic [PDF]
Karl Pajusalu: Phonological Innovations of the Southern Finnic Languages [PDF]
Petri Kallio: The Prehistoric Germanic Loanword Strata in Finnic [PDF]
Guus Kroonen: Non-Indo-European root nouns in Germanic: evidence in support of the Agricultural Substrate Hypothesis [PDF]
Santeri Junttila: The prehistoric context of the oldest contacts between Baltic and Finnic languages [PDF]
Riho Grünthal: Baltic loanwords in Mordvin [PDF]
Willem Vermeer: Why Baba-Yaga? Substratal phonetics and restoration of velars subject to the Progressive Palatalization in Russian/Belorussian and adjacent areas (appr. 600–900 CE) [PDF]

http://www.sgr.fi/sust/sust266/sust266.html
 
The Goths maybe? They were in the Balkans
 
Yo Ustasha up there. calm down with the Xenophobia.
Bosnians are not Turkish or Arabic or whatever. These genetic projects have proven that. Which makes you even more ignorant now flaunting your dumb ideologies. I'm not even religious (and most Bosnians are very secular) but Bosnia is not Islamic occupied. It's a colony of NATO and the EU (not an official member but controlled by their banks nonetheless) just like your precious Croatia.
 

This thread has been viewed 59747 times.

Back
Top