Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Craniological studies of samples from the Pazyryk burials revealed the presence of both Mongoloid and Caucasoid components in this population.[4] quoting G. F. Debets on the physical characteristics of the population in the Pazyryk kurgans, records a mixed population. The men would seem to be part Mongoloid and the women Europoid.[5]
According to the Dodecad K12 and K12b admixtures, there is only about 6% of Mongoloid admixtures among the Turks.
According to the Dodecad K12 and K12b admixtures, there is only about 6% of Mongoloid admixtures among the Turks.
My thoughts also. Could it actually vary as much ad Gurk atla suggests? It must be spread very evenly considering that the admixture is between 1500 and 500 years old.
Turks with over 15% East Asian Genes are very rare. The average Turk has something around your 10%, some even less. But there are areas, for example Southwest and Central Turkey with almost 15%.
Udmurts are Uralic speakers and their genetic data and looks indicates a Caucasian origin. (~80-90%)
15% is not rare compared to those with 17 - 25% Mongoloid admixture. Those are very rare although they exist individually.
Depends on what Uralic tribe. Some have 16%, some 20% and some 35%.
Yes I said above 15% so 16-25%.
Most Uralic tribes have 10-20% but some can have higher. But the point is that Uralics generally have +70% Caucasian genes so a Caucasian origin makes sense.
Interesting you have a link to this percentage?Udmurt have Mongoloid 35.1% on average
Interesting you have a link to this percentage?
Udmurts
Sayomedic 29.6%
North Siberian 3.7%
East Siberian 1.8%
= 35.1%
I believe these DNA can seen on their face
Now the Question is, what is Sayomedic. I somehow doubt that it is entirely East Asian.
The photo below is anyhing but Asiatic looking. They could even pass as Irish.
Edit: As I thought Samoyedic component is not typical East Asian.
The People called Samoyed are Uralic speakers and the Uralic speakers themselves are taken as reference population.
And as we know Uralic speakers are far from being East Asian.
So 30% Samoyedic ≠ 30% East Asian.
The Siberian admixture is small in West Finns and Estonians, and largely missing in Veps and Latvians, who descend from Uralic-speaking peoples (Livonian in the case of Latvians). We also know from linguistics that early Uralics had close contacts with proto-Indo-Europeans, of which very few groups today show Siberian admixture. All this would lead me to believe that the original Uralic people were at least mostly Caucasoid, and that the Siberian admixture has come later.
At least in the case of Finns, it is a fairly accepted theory that the 6% Siberian admixture came from the proto-Saamis, who had in turn picked it up from a Siberian people. Finnish Saami have about 10-15% Siberian admixture.
Of course, Finnic peoples living close to the Volga urheimat have more Siberian admixture, so the original people may have been close to modern Mordvins.
This sets Uralics apart from Turks. While Turks descend from a mostly mongoloid population which has been diluted among Caucasoid, the reverse is true for Uralics.
This thread has been viewed 227429 times.