1 members found this post helpful.
I have heard very bad to very good reports of this Scottish company. Most tests are not that good apart from chromo2.
The chromo2 is very good revealing more new markers than most other companies. Especially since Thomas Krahn has been dismissed by FTDna for not keeping "company findings" of new sublades hidden from competitors.
But Britains DNA are pricey.
The other good report is the accuracy of origin of subclades and their naming of these origins , like
I-S333 is Thracian
I-S392 is Illyrian
I-S165 is caledonian etc
có che un pòpoło no 'l defende pi ła só łéngua el xe prónto par èser s'ciavo
when a people no longer dares to defend its language it is ripe for slavery.