Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
For example take a look at this picture these are from Karalapakstan
Noticed that all the men look Mongoloid or closer to Mongoloid while most of the women look Caucasoid.
It could be only seen in Y/mT DNA maps, but the first generation of children would have already been 50/50 mix.
The funny part is on y/mt DNA maps it appears much more like the Indo European influx came from the paternal side. He just rhymes things together.
Now since it is about these things,what are you thinking about this study,of David Faux?
He is suggesting Norse R1A1 is rather Central Asian in origins.
http://www.davidkfaux.org/CentralAsiaRootsofScandinavia-Y-DNAEvidence.pdf
However,I think that this document shows that there is resemblance between Central Asian R1A1 and Norse R1A1,but we can not conclude that Turkic or other Asian people brought that R1A1 there .
Maybe some Indo Europeans brought this R1A1 in both places,Scythians,or Cimmerians or who know what people they were.
Or maybe even Norse people brought that R1A1 there.
Since there is no Central Asia in Norse on autosomal DNA tests,but I think in Central Asian people there is autosomal DNA that can be linked with IE people.
So I think what Alan said there can be actually verified.
The funny part is on y/mt DNA maps it appears much more like the Indo European influx came from the paternal side. He just rhymes things together.
It is common sense that R1a1 in Europe did come from somewhere else, Central Asian as possible place of origin is also a possibility.
But than this doesn't have much to do with Turkic migrations because back than they likely didn't exist and Central Asia was widely inhabidet by Indo European tribes.
And this is the point. Caucasian contribution to Mongols or Turkic tribes is predominantly about the male (not female) lineage. So much to the rape story.
on the contrary men and women are looking in same fenotype. also you couldn't make a conclusion with olny one picture which is eems very relative.
This is because you don't understand.
1. Mongolian male DNA is 3 times more common in Central Asia than Mongolians females. So rape do exist but it's not only Caucasoid females because central Asia already had both Caucasoid and Caucasoid/Mongoloid
2. The Mongoloid DNA in Central Asians before were from Turkic/Siberians not from Mongolians and Siberian mtDNA is 3 times more common in Central Asian than males.
3. You're absolutely wrong about Caucasian contribution is predominately males in Mongols
Mongolians Caucasian female DNA 13.45% + male 8%
Buryats Caucasian female DNA 15.7% + male 6%
Kalmyk Caucasian female DNA 23.6% + male 9%
I think you don't understand your own chart, where ever it might be from. Tatars 81%, Turkmens 83%, Tajik 85%, Uzbek 70%, Kyrgyz 70% (I don't believe the Kazakh once, it must be wrong).
Are you ********.
Oh now I see, you claim Mongols belonged to Turkic DNA. You must be one of those Guys who believe everything from Mongols to Scythians were Turkic :lol:
By the way you expert, when Mongols were already 50/50 West and East Eurasian mixed who brought that West Eurasian genes to them and why does the East Eurasian dominates in them today :lol:
This thread has been viewed 63408 times.