New dedicated page for Y-haplogroup N1c

>Lithuanian barrow culture is insignificant in current discussion trend, because it is only Lithuanian locality and can't be a source for both Latvian and Lithuanian N1a.

How is it insignificant? You brought it up that Latvians and Lithuanians can't be from Brushed Pottery culture, archaeologically all of Lithuanian and Latvian tribes in broad sense like Selonians,Semigalians,Lithuanians,Samogitians, Curonians all of them formed on the basis of Brushed Pottery culture some with additional influx of West Baltic burrow culture or vice versa from Lithuanian/Latvian/Prussian coast. Do you have anything to back up your theories other than your own opinion?

View attachment 10791
 

This thread has been viewed 55386 times.

Back
Top