Byzantium

[h=2]Byzantine Mesopotamia[/h]
11-Byzantine%2Bzenobia%2B3.jpg


The citadel of the Roman-Byzantine fortress of Zenobia near Halabiye, Syria. View from the southern wall looking down to the Euphrates River.
 
[h=2]Byzantine Croatia[/h]
11-kornati-tureta3.jpg

The Byzantine Fortress of Tureta in Croatia. The fortress is the most significant structure on the Kornati islands dating from the Byzantine period. It is located on the island of Kornat and was probably built in the 8th century. It is assumed that the fortress was built up for military purposes to protect and control the navigation in this part of the Adriatic Sea.
 
[h=2]Byzantine Egypt[/h]
11-st-catherine-mount-sinai.jpg

Saint Catherine's Monastery lies on the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. The fortified monastery was built by the Byzantine Emperor Justinian in the 6th century AD, although there was already a church at the site erected by the Empress Helena in 330 AD. The Monastery also has a copy of the Achtiname, in which Muhammad bestowed his protection upon the monastery.
 
[h=2]Byzantine Greece[/h]
11-corfu.jpg

Angelokastro or "Castle of the Angels" is one of the most important Byzantine castles of Greece. It is located on the island of Corfu at the top of the highest peak of the island's shoreline in the northwest coast near Palaiokastritsa and built on particularly precipitous and rocky terrain. It stands 1,000 ft (305 m) on a steep cliff above the Ionian Sea and surveys the City of Corfu and the mountains of mainland Greece to the southeast and a wide area of Corfu toward the northeast and northwest.
 
[h=2]Byzantine Anatolia[/h]
111%253Dharput.jpg

The Roman-Byzantine Castle of Harput in Anatolia. The strong point Harput was part of both the Roman and Byzantine defensive systems. Eastern Anatolia saw many huge military campaigns from Roman to Byzantine times. This area was involved in multiple wars with the Persian Empire, Arabs and Turks.
 
Byzantine Albania
Berat Castle, Albania

11=beret+castle+2.jpg

Berat Castle is a fortress overlooking the town of Berat, Albania. It dates mainly from the 13th century and contains many Byzantine churches in the area and Ottoman mosques. It is built on a rocky hill on the left bank of the river Osum and is accessible only from the south.

After being burned down by the Romans in 200 B.C., the walls were strengthened in the fifth century under Byzantine Emperor Theodosius II, and were rebuilt during the 6th century under the Emperor Justinian I and again in the 13th century under the Despot of Epirus, Michael I Komnenos Doukas, cousin of the Byzantine Emperor.


Justinian.jpg

Emperor Justinian

In the Siege of Berat the forces of the Angevin Kingdom of Sicily faced off against the Byzantine garrison of the city in 1280–1281. Berat was a strategically important fortress, whose possession would allow the Angevins access to the heartlands of the Byzantine Empire.

A Byzantine relief force arrived in spring 1281, and managed to ambush and capture the Angevin commander, Hugo de Sully. Thereupon, the Angevin army panicked and fled, suffering heavy losses in killed and wounded as it was attacked by the Byzantines. This defeat ended the threat of a land invasion of the Byzantine Empire, and along with the Sicilian Vespers marked the end of the Western threat to reconquer Byzantium.
The main entrance, on the north side, is defended by a fortified courtyard and there are three smaller entrances.

The fortress of Berat in its present state, even though considerably damaged, remains a magnificent sight. The surface that it encompasses made it possible to house a considerable portion of the cities inhabitants. The buildings inside the fortress were built during the 13th century and because of their characteristic architecture are preserved as cultural monuments.

The population of the fortress was Christian, and it had about 20 churches most built during the 13th century and only one mosque, for the use of the Turkish garrison (of which there survives only a few ruins and the base of the minaret).
The churches of the fortress were damaged through years and only some have remained.
Berat Castle is depicted on the reverse of the Albanian 10 lekë coin, issued in 1996 and 2000.

Berat Castle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KVtiL10uBkk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XnQeo35_qnU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=URucnyVM1Zo


11=beret+castle.jpg

Statue in Berat Castle (UNESCO World Heritage site), Albania

berat%20sh%20b%20mes%205.jpg

111=berat_castle_albania_6.jpg
111-BERAT-CIDADELA-GRUPO.jpg


11=beret+castle+6.jpg

11=beret+castle+3.jpg

11=beret+castle+4.jpg

11=beret+castle+5.jpg

11=beret+castle+7.jpg

_0002_berat.jpg

berati-130226083824-phpapp01-thumbnail-4.jpg

berati-vjeter-kala%201.jpg

brati-kalaja%20ajri%202.jpg

berat%20sh%20b%204.jpg

berat%20sh%20b%207.jpg
 
Byzantine Albania
[h=3]Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081)[/h]
Varangian+guard.png

The Varangian Guard
The Varangian Guard was an elite unit of the Byzantine Army in 10th to the 14th centuries, whose members served as personal bodyguards of the Byzantine Emperors.
.
The guard was first formed under Emperor Basil II in 988, following the Christianization of Kievan Rus' by Vladimir I of Kiev. Vladimir, who had recently usurped power in Kiev with an army of Varangian warriors, sent 6,000 men to Basil as part of a military assistance agreement.
.
This man is of Scandinavian origin, migrated in Kievan Rus kingdom. The shield depicts the crow-symbol of god Odin and he holds Danish Axe. Greaves, hand protection, chest leather strips and pteryges, are obviously Byzantine, borrowed from the Imperial arsenal.
Normans vs Byzantines - The Battle of Dyrrhachium

  • In 1071 the Romans experienced their greatest defeat ever at the Battle of Manzikert. The eastern provinces of the Empire were being overrun by Muslim Turks. It was at this moment that the Normans chose to invade the Roman Western provinces to carve out an even greater empire for themselves at the expense of fellow Christians.


The Battle of Dyrrhachium (near present-day Durrës in Albania) took place on October 18, 1081 between the Roman Empire, led by the Emperor Alexius I Comnenus, and the Normans of southern Italy under Robert Guiscard, Duke of Apulia and Calabria. The battle was fought outside the city of Dyrrhachium (also known as Durazzo), the Byzantine capital of Illyria.

Following the Norman conquest of Byzantine Italy and Saracen Sicily, the Byzantine emperor, Michael VII Doukas, betrothed his son to Robert Guiscard's daughter and sent her to Constantinople.

Guiscard’s ambitions drew him east, for the new Byzantine Emperor Alexius Comnenus was deeply involved in recovering Asia Minor after a disastrous defeat by the Turks at Manzikert in 1071.
Early_medieval_Balkans.png


Prelude

Guiscard conscripted all men of a fighting age into the army, which he refitted. He sent his son Bohemond with an advance force towards what is modern Albania. Bohemond landed at Aulon, with Guiscard following shortly.

The Norman fleet of 150 ships including 60 horse transports set off towards the Byzantine Empire at the end of May 1081. The army numbered 30,000 men, backed up by 1,300 Norman knights. The fleet sailed to Avalona in Byzantine territory; they were joined by several ships from Ragusa, a republic in the Balkans who were enemies of the Byzantines.


Robert Guiscard
Duke of Apulia and Calabria

Robert soon left Avalona and sailed to the island of Corfu, which surrendered because of a small garrison. Having won a bridgehead and a clear path for reinforcements from Italy, he advanced on the city of Dyrrhachium, the capital and chief port of Illyria.

The city was well defended on a long, narrow peninsula running parallel to the coast, but separated by marshlands. Guiscard brought his army onto the peninsula and pitched camp outside the city walls. However, as Robert's fleet sailed to Dyrrhachium, it was hit by a storm and lost several ships

Meanwhile, when Alexius heard that the Normans were preparing to invade Byzantine territory, he sent an ambassador to the Doge of Venice, Domenico Selvo, requesting aid and offering trading rights in return.

The Doge, alarmed by Norman control of the Strait of Otranto, took command of the Venetian fleet and sailed at once, surprising the Norman fleet under the command of Bohemond as night was falling. The Normans counter-attacked tenaciously, but their inexperience in naval combat betrayed them. The experienced Venetian navy attacked in a close formation known as "sea harbour" and together with their use of Greek fire "bombs", the Norman line scattered, and the Venetian fleet sailed into Dyrrhachium's harbour.










Durrës Castle, Albania.
Durrës (Dyrrhachium) was the center of a battle between invading Normans and the Roman Empire. The castle was built by Emperor of the Byzantine Empire Anastasius I originating from Durres, which transformed it into one of the most fortified cities on the Adriatic.
.
The Roman emperor Caesar Augustus made the city a colony for veterans of his legions following the Battle of Actium, proclaiming it a civitas libera (free town). In the 4th century, Dyrrachium was made the capital of the Roman province of Epirus nova.

Near the port of Durrës is the ancient Byzantine city wall.

Siege of Dyrrhachium

Robert was not discouraged by this naval defeat, and began his siege of Dyrrhachium. In command of the garrison at Dyrrhachium was the experienced general George Palaeologus, sent by Alexius with orders to hold out at all costs while Alexius himself mustered an army to relieve the city.

Meanwhile, a Byzantine fleet arrived and – after joining with the Venetian fleet – attacked the Norman fleet, which was again routed. The garrison at Dyrrhachium managed to hold out all summer, despite Robert's catapults, ballistae and siege tower. The garrison made continuous sallies from the city; on one occasion, Palaeologus fought all day with an arrowhead in his skull. Another sally succeeded in destroying Robert's siege tower.

Robert's camp was struck by disease; according to contemporary historian Anna Comnena up to 10,000 men died, including 500 knights.

Norman infantry reenactors.
.
"Not being satisfied with the men who had served in his army from the beginning and had experience in battle, he formed a new army, made up of recruits without any consideration of age. From all quarters of Lombardy and Apulia he gathered them, over age and under age, pitiable objects who had never seen armour in their dreams, but then clad in breastplates and carrying shields, awkwardly drawing bows to which they were completely unused and following flat on the ground when they were allowed to march."
Princess Anna Comnena
describing Robert Guiscard's conscription.

Norman Cavalry Charge
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odxwYPrtXUU&feature=player_embedded

Norman Cavalry Attacking
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ElykPHD6lFw



Norman Cavalry.
"Alexius was undoubtedly a good tactician, but he was badly let down by the indisciplined rush to pursue the beaten enemy wings, a cardinal sin in the Byzantine tactical manuals. He failed to take adequate account of the effectiveness of the Norman heavy cavalry charge, which punched through his lines with little resistance."
Historian John Haldon's assessment of the battle
The situation of the Dyrrhachium garrison grew desperate because of the effects of Norman siege weapons. Alexius learned of this while he was in Salonica with his army so he advanced in full force against the Normans.

According to Comnena, Alexius had about 20,000 men. It consisted of Thracian and Macedonian tagmata, which numbered about 5,000 men; the elite excubitors and vestiaritai units, which numbered around 1,000 men; a force of Manichaeans which comprised 2,800 men, Thessalian cavalry, Balkan conscripts, Armenian infantry and other light troops.

As well as the native troops, the Byzantines were joined by 2,000 Turkish and 1,000 Frankish mercenaries, about 1,000 Varangians and 7,000 Turkish auxiliaries sent by the Seljuk Sultanate of Rûm. Alexius also withdrew the tagmas from Heraclea Pontica and the remaining Byzantine holdings in Asia Minor and by doing so, he effectively left them to be overrun by the Turks.


Battle

Alexius advanced from Salonica and pitched camp on the river Charzanes near Dyrrhachium on October 15. He held a war council there and sought advice from his senior officers; among them was George Palaeologus, who had managed to sneak out of the city. A majority of the senior officers, including Palaeologus, urged caution, noting that time was with the Emperor. Alexius, however, favoured an immediate assault, hoping to catch Guiscard's army from the rear, while they were still besieging the city. Alexius moved his army to the hills opposite the city, planning to attack the Normans the next day.

Guiscard, however, had been informed of Alexius' arrival by his scouts and on the night of October 17, he moved his army from the peninsula to the mainland. Upon learning of Guiscard's move, Alexius revised his battle plan. He split his army into three divisions, with the left wing under the command of Gregory Pakourianos, the right wing under the command of Nikephoros Melissenos, and himself in command of the centre. Guiscard formed his battle line opposite Alexius's, with the right wing under the command of the Count of Giovinazzo, the left under Bohemond and Guiscard facing Alexius in the centre.


Bad Day at Dyrrhachium- A Varangian Perspective
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNWuHQW5iyo&feature=player_embedded

The Varangians had been ordered to march just in front of the main line with a strong division of archers a little behind them. The archers had been commanded to move in front of the Varangians and fire a volley before retreating behind them. The archers continued this tactic until the army neared contact.

As the opposing armies closed in, Guiscard sent a detachment of cavalry positioned in the centre to feint an attack on the Byzantine positions. Guiscard hoped the feint would draw up the Varangians; however, this plan failed when the cavalry was forced back by the archers.

The Norman right wing suddenly charged forward to the point where the Byzantine left and centre met, directing its attack against the Varangian left flank. The Varangians stood their ground while the Byzantine left, including some of Alexius' elite troops, attacked the Normans. The Norman formation disintegrated and the routed Normans fled towards the beach. There, according to Comnena, they were rallied by Guiscard's wife, Sikelgaita, described as "like another Pallas, if not a second Athena".

Emperor Alexios I Komnenos

Byzantine collapse

In the meantime, the Byzantine right and centre had been engaging in skirmishes with the Normans opposite them. However, with the collapse of the Norman right, the knights were in danger of being outflanked.

At this point, the Varangians (mainly Anglo-Saxons who had left England after the Norman Conquest) joined in the pursuit of the Norman right. With their massive battle axes, the Varangians attacked the Norman knights, who were driven away after their horses panicked. The Varangians soon became separated from the main force and exhausted so they were in no position to resist an assault.

Guiscard sent a strong force of spearmen and crossbowmen against the Varangian flank and inflicted heavy casualties on them. The few remaining Varangians fled into the church of the Archangel Michael. The Normans immediately set the church on fire, and all Varangians perished in the blaze.

Meanwhile, George Palaeologus sortied out of Dyrrhachium, but failed to save the situation. Worse, Alexius's vassal, King Constantine Bodin of Duklja, betrayed him. The Turks who had been lent to him by the Seljuk Sultan Suleyman I followed Constantine's example and deserted.

Deprived of his left wing (still in pursuit of the Norman right), Alexius was exposed in the centre. Guiscard sent his heavy cavalry against the Byzantine centre. They first routed the Byzantine skirmishers before breaking into small detachments and smashing into various points of the Byzantine line. This charge broke the Byzantine lines and caused them to rout. The imperial camp, which had been left unguarded, fell to the Normans.

Byzantine Tagmata
The Roman Army at Dyrrhachium included
Thracian and Macedonian Tagmata, which
numbered about 5,000 men.
Alexius and his guards resisted as long as they could before retreating. As they retreated, Alexius was separated from his guard and was attacked by Norman soldiers. While escaping, he was wounded in his forehead and lost a lot of blood, but eventually made it back to Ohrid, where he regrouped his army.


Aftermath

The battle was a heavy defeat for Alexius. Historian Jonathan Harris states that the defeat was "every bit as severe as that at Manzikert." He lost about 5,000 of his men, including most of the Varangians. Norman losses are unknown, but John Haldon claims they are substantial as both wings broke and fled. Historian Robert Holmes states: "The new knightly tactic of charging with the lance couched – tucked firmly under the arm to unite the impact of man and horse – proved a battle-winner."

George Palaeologus had not been able to re-enter the city after the battle and left with the main force. The defense of the citadel was left to the Venetians, while the city itself was left to an Albanian, Komiskortes.

In February 1082, Dyrrhachium fell after a Venetian or Amalfian citizen opened the gates to the Normans. The Norman army proceeded to take most of northern Greece without facing much resistance. While Guiscard was in Kastoria, messengers arrived from Italy, bearing news that Apulia, Calabria, and Campania were in revolt.

He also learned that the Holy Roman Emperor, Henry IV, was at the gates of Rome and besieging Pope Gregory VII, a Norman ally. Alexius had negotiated with Henry and given him 360,000 gold pieces in return for an alliance. Henry responded by invading Italy and attacking the Pope. Guiscard rushed to Italy, leaving Bohemond in command of the army in Greece.


Varangian Guards.(in ceremonial costumes)
Nea Moni-Chios Monastery-1040's.

Alexius, desperate for money, ordered the confiscation of all the church's treasure. With this money, Alexius mustered an army near Thessalonica and went to fight Bohemond. However, Bohemond defeated Alexius in two battles: one near Arta and the other near Ioannina.

This left Bohemond in control of Macedonia and nearly all of Thessaly. Bohemond advanced with his army against the city of Larissa. Meanwhile, Alexius had mustered a new army and with 7,000 Seljuk Turks sent by the Sultan, he advanced on the Normans at Larissa and defeated them. The demoralised and unpaid Norman army returned to the coast and sailed back to Italy.

Meanwhile, Alexius granted the Venetians a commercial colony in Constantinople, as well as exemption from trading duties in return for their renewed aid. They responded by recapturing Dyrrhachium and Corfu and returning them to the Byzantine Empire. These victories returned the Empire to its previous status quo and marked the beginning of the Komnenian restoration


The Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081 A.D.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azkoIZ4l9Ik&feature=player_embedded
norman.jpg
 
One of things from Byzantine era that fascinate people is certainly Byzantine art.

Several links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_art

http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/history-of-art/byzantine.htm

https://www.elcamino.edu/faculty/eatherton/byzantine.html

...
Early Christian art

Hagios Georgios, Thessaloniki, Greece, c.300 and later, Eastern Exterior

001-1.jpg


Hagios Georgios, dome mosaic, detail

001-4.jpg

The Sixth century art

Land walls of Theodosius II, Istanbul, 412-13.

032.jpg

The Transfiguration, c. 565/6. Acse mosic.St Catherine's Monastery, Sinai.

038-1.jpg

Apse mosic.St Catherine's Monastery, Sinai.

038.jpg
 
Sixth century art

The Transfiguration, c. 565/6. Apse mosic.St Catherine's Monastery, Sinai.

038-1.jpg


Christ and the Theotokos and Child with saints and angels. 6th cent. Ivory dyptich.

043.jpg



The Entry into Jerusalem. Rossano Codex. Detail.

045.jpg


Christ Heals Two Blind Men, folio 29r, Sinope Gospels, 6th cent. (place of origin Syria, Palestine even Mesopotamia.)

046-2.jpg


The Structure of the Greek Iconostasis

055-1.jpg


1 . The Crucifix with Mary and John
2 . The Deesis in the center with archangels and saints
3 . Removable or permanent feast day icons
4 . The Annunciation to Mary
5 . The four Evangelists or four Church Fathers
6 . An angel or deacon
7 . An icon of Christ
8 . An icon of the Mother of God
9 . Local saints
 
The following quotes are from Byzantine Greeks between the 12th and 15th century A.D. It gives an indication of how they identified themselves in that period.

The great historian Chalcokondyles in the 15th centrury A.D., writes:
«… ,ᾤκηται, Βυζάντιον Ἑλληνίδα πόλιν μητρόπολιν σφῶν ἀποδεικνύντας, πρὸς Πέρσας, ὑφ' ὧν ἀνήκεστα ἐπεπόνθεισαν, τὸν ἀγῶνα ποιεῖσθαι, Ἕλληνάς τε τὸ ἀπὸ τοῦδε Ῥωμαίοις αὐτοῦ ἐπιμιγνύντας, γλῶτταν μὲν καὶ ἤθη διὰ τὸ πολλῷ πλέονας Ῥωμαίων Ἕλληνας αὐτοῦ ἐπικρατεῖν διὰ τέλους φυλάξαι, τοὔνομα μέντοι μηκέτι κατὰ τὸ πάτριον καλουμένους ἀλλάξασθαι, καὶ τούς γε βασιλεῖς Βυζαντίου ἐπὶ τὸ σφᾶς αὐτοὺς Ῥωμαίων βασιλεῖς τε καὶ αὐτοκράτορας σεμνύνεσθαι ἀποκαλεῖν, Ἑλλήνων δὲ βασιλεῖς οὐκέτι οὐδαμῇ ἀξιοῦν. …»

“ Byzantion a Greek city was proved a capital, close to Persians, from who many difficulties experienced, and so Greeks with Romans mixed, but language and culture were kept until now the same because Greeks were much more than the Romans, and we’ve changed our fathers’ name, and so the kings of Byzantion were called themselves Kings and Emperors of Romaioi and wouldn’t care to be called kings of Hellenes,…"

Manuel Chrysololas 14th Century A.D.:
«Μεμνώμεθα οἵων ἀνδρῶν ἔκγονοι γεγόναμεν, εἰ μὲν βούλοιτό τις λέγειν τῶν προτέρων καὶ ἀρχαιοτέρων, λέγω δὴ τῶν πρεσβυτάτων καὶ παλαιῶν Ἑλλήνων, ὧν τῆς δυνάμεως καὶ τῆς σοφίας οὐδεὶς ἀνήκοος μεμένηκεν· εἰ δὲ βούλει, τῶν μετ’ ἐκείνους γενομένων ἡμῖν προγόνων, τῶν παλαιῶν Ῥωμαίων, ἀφ’ ὧν νῦν ὀνομαζόμεθα καὶ οἳ δήπου ἀξιοῦμεν εἶναι, ὥς τε καὶ τὴν ἀρχαίαν ὀνομασίαν σχεδὸν ἀποβαλεῖν· μᾶλλον δὲ ἄμφω τούτω τὼ γένει ἐφ’ ἡμῖν δήπου συνελήλυθε καὶ εἴτε Ἕλληνας βούλοιτό τις λέγειν εἴτε Ῥωμαίους, ἡμεῖς ἐσμὲν ἐκεῖνοι καὶ τὴν Ἀλεξάνδρου δὲ καὶ τῶν μετ’ ἐκείνων ἡμεῖς σώζομεν διαδοχήν»

E. Legrand, Bibliographie Hellénique, ou description raisonnée des ouvrages en grec par les grecs aux XVe et XVIe siècles, t. I, Paris 1885, 197.

"We remember of what men descendants we are, and if one wants can say of the foremost and more ancient, and I say of the premier and old Greeks, whose power and wisdom none has left without heard of, and if some wants, along with them became our ancestors, the old Romans, from whom we took our name and claim to be, so our ancient name almost abandoned( the Hellenes), for most part by these two races we come and we can call(ourselves) Hellenes or Romaioi, sincewe are those who are the inheritors of Alexander and his after him."

The historian Giorgos Acropolites in the 13th century A.D.:

«ὡς ἔοικε γοῦν τῆς ἀρχαίας ἡμετέρας ἀγάπης οὐκέτι ἔχετε μνήμην, ὦ Ἰταλοί. εἰ γοῦν ἐν λήθῃ ταύτης γεγένησθε, ἐγὼ ταύτης ὑμᾶς ἀναμνήσαιμι. οὐκ ἄλλα ἄττα τῶν ἐθνῶν εἰς τοσαύτην προέβη τὴν ὁ μόνοιαν καὶ τὴν σύμπνοιαν ὡς Γραικοί τε καὶ Ἰταλοί. καὶ εἰκότως• ἐκ Γραικῶν γὰρ τοῖς Ἰταλοῖς καὶ αἱ λογικαὶ ἐπι στῆμαι καὶ τὰ μαθήματα. κἀντεῦθεν ἵνα μὴ τοῖς ἐθνικοῖς τούτοις ὀνόμασι περιγράφωνται, τῇ πρεσβυτέρᾳ Ῥώμη ἑτέρα νέα ἀντῳκοδόμηται, ἵνα ἐξ οὕτω μεγίστων πόλεων κοινὸν ἐχουσῶν τοὔνομα Ῥωμαῖοι πάντες κατονομάζοιντο καὶ ὡς τὸ τῆς πίστεως κοινὸν οὕτως ἔχοιεν καὶ τὸ τῆς κλήσεως. καὶ ὡς ἐκ Χριστοῦ ταὐτὸ τὸ τιμιώτατον ἔλαχον ὄνομα, οὕτω καὶ τὸ ἐθνικὸν αὐτοῖς ἐπηγάγοντο. καὶ πάντα δὲ τὰ ἄλλα ὑπῆρχε τούτοις κοινά, ἀρχαὶ νόμοι λόγοι βουλαὶ δικαστήρια, αὐτὴ ἡ εὐσέβεια, οὐδὲν ὅτι μὴ κοινὸν Ῥωμαίοις τοῖς παλαιοτέροις καὶ νεωτέροις.»

“Its seems that our ancient love among us you don’t have remember it, o Italians, and if you indeed forgot that(love), I’ll remind it to you, because with no other nations has such harmony and unity occurred as between Greeks and Italians, because from Greeks Italians got the science and after that the ethnic names weren’t used, and a new Rome was built, and because of these great cities we have common name, and Romaioi all we are called and had the same faith and the same name for it, a name from Christs’ name, so and an ethnic name, and everything we had in common, laws, philology, judgement, and devoutness, and all were shared by old and new Romans”
 
I think it depends on the time period. Originally, it was an attempt to build a new Roman capital in the east, but by the time of the Crusades, it was a Greek empire, IMO.

The city of Byzantium"Greek Byzantion" at the Hellespont was founded/build by Greek settlers from Megara in 600 B.C

Their leader was named Byzas,hence the name.

The Roman emporer Constantine the Great declared it as the new capital of Rome in 300-400 A.D and it was
named Constantinople which comes from Greek Polis and Constantine meaning the Polis"City" of
Constantine.
 
Last edited:

This thread has been viewed 75451 times.

Back
Top