Very interesting posts guys, everyone is welcome to share their point or theories and any other data...
We still need more data for sure, old data I mean since the modern ones I believe would only confuse us even more...
Angela mentioned that Pelasgian as a word might mean just a region and not individuals, but that might not be the case, we dont have old samples yet especially those of males, but we do have historical mentioning that they where people indeed, maybe that might be right, as with Illyria since it was quite a big region and many tribes or ethnicities might have lived in the Illyrian regions, Pelasgians might be a bit different since the history mentioned that they were low in numbers and the region was not as vast as Illyria
So definitely no data yet here so we can't conclude anything, only historical, that might be as well very subjective, but I would still believe history than theories with no data, or at least significant data
Angela is you have more data as of why you think Pelasgia was only a region, please share...
Note: When I mentioned "Would the Pelasgian DNA be E-V13", of course I mean their highest in % since we know everyone is mixed lol, I am just speculating of course but am not believing at all that Pelasgians were very related with Minoans or Mycenenian, I still believe Pelasgians were very barbaric, on around middle Neolithic, very low in numbers who lived mostly in mountains as barbars, as it notes they were the very first man from Africa, (that is why I link it with E-V13) it might be true but of course we need data, so Minoan/Mycenenian civilization had nothing to do with them I believe..