Ike
Regular Member
- Messages
- 1,128
- Reaction score
- 93
- Points
- 0
I understand this, I'm trying to be nice here but have to do battles with intolerant Ike.
Nope, analogy is wrong, which means you still don't understand.
You mean Tito was "more" tolerant ........
On the contrary. But Tito wasn't tolerant in a way people perceive tolerance today. He knew that imperialists are working hard to destroy Yugoslavia, and his secret service worked hard on suppressing foreign influence and executed enemies. After his death the period of tolerance begun, and Yugoslavia ended up like it did - in the flames of imposed tolerance.
after his death , the serbian majority of Yugoslavia tried to enforce Serbian language all over yugoslavia , fining anyone not speaking serbian.
My slovenian auntie ( by marriage via 1st cousin ) wrote about this to my father before she moved to Turin
Where did you get that? There is no way to enforce Serbian language over Slovenia, and never have I heard of such attempt. Can you be more precise with some facts?
And how the hell does one even differ Serbian from Bosnian from Croatian? It is the same language. It's like saying that Californians tried to impose Californian language to Nevada and Arizona.