I don't understand how you can just willy nilly combine data from different studies that don't even test for the subclades you have listed in your results. I looked at most of them and none of them test for the same subclades you have listed. I looked at the FTDNA project for East Anglia, they have less than 200 members and you list the sample size as 466. Actual academics must just look at the material on here and cringe, I know I do.
FYI, I didn't just use the FTDNA data for regional percentages but all the other studies mentioned in the sources. For East Anglia that includes 172 samples from Rosser 2000 and 121 samples from Capelli 2003.
In every single paper that has been released for the past 2 years all of them support an Y DNA r1b and mtdna H expansion in Europe with the bell beaker culture and yet this mainstream theory is disregarded in favor of nonsense.
I have said that R1b originated in the Yamna and Maykop cultures and spread around Europe during the Bronze Age with IE migrations since 2009. Up to academics all said that R1b descended from Cro-Magnon and re-exapnded from the Franco-Cantabrian LGM refuge. In 2010, Balaresque et al. launched a new fanciful trend by claiming that R1b came with Neolithic farmers from the Near East, a theory that was supported by virtually all academics (and by Dienekes on his blog) until 2013-2014 when no R1b at all turned up in any of the Neolithic Y-DNA samples tested around Europe. Yet some people still believe that R1b came with Neolithic farmers. Just because R1b-M269 was found in a site labelled as "Bell Beaker" by Lee et al. does not mean that these individuals belong to the same ethnicity as the original Bell Beakers of Portugal. In fact, if you look at the mtDNA found alongside the Thuringian R1b, it looks typically Yamna (U2e, U5a1, T1a, K1, I1a1 and W5a), while the mtDNA tested in Megalithic Iberia doesn't (HV, H, K1a, J, T2, U5b, X).
Some people (like that guy from the Bell Beaker blog) even used my own explanation that R1b-V88 spread to North Africa during the Neolithic to make up other fanciful hypotheses about R1b-M269 oddly emerging from V88 (a phylogenetic nonsense) and spreading to Iberia to form the Bell Beaker culture in the Late Neolithic. I am not saying that R1b-V88 wasn't present in Neolithic Iberia. It probably was at low levels (alongside I2a1, G2a, etc.). But it cannot be the source of R1b-M269, which makes up the vast majority of European R1b. As for R1b-M269 spreading to North Africa then to Iberia instead of R1b-V88, that makes even less sense since there is virtually no R1b-M269 in North Africa.