Greying Wanderer
Elite member
- Messages
- 533
- Reaction score
- 86
- Points
- 0
Any V subclades come to mind?
Lactose Tolerance
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Any V subclades come to mind?
Lactose Tolerance
I'm so sorry to non this but I don't quite se a connection with the Atlantic admixture and Lactose persistence
Welcome Llandeilo!
I think "Atlantic" in K15, is a mixture of two different components origin: North Atlantic (Origin WHG) + Iberian (EEF), which gives it a hardly understandable aspect in K15.
In clear, i think "Atlantic" did not exist!
You should try K36.
It is possible that you have a higher rate for North Atlantic and low for Iberian.
For comparison, in K36, British have about 17% for North Atlantic and 12% for Iberian
Population | Percent |
East_Med | 30.31 |
West_Med | 17.77 |
West_Asian | 17.34 |
Atlantic | 12.77 |
North_Sea | 9.65 |
Baltic | 4.01 |
Eastern_Euro | 3.49 |
Red_Sea | 1.73 |
Northeast_African | 1.23 |
Oceanian | 1.09 |
Sub-Saharan | 0.6 |
Population (source) | Distance |
South_Italian | 5.19 |
Central_Greek | 5.69 |
East_Sicilian | 6.66 |
Italian_Abruzzo | 7.68 |
West_Sicilian | 8.79 |
Italian_Jewish | 8.8 |
Ashkenazi | 8.99 |
Sephardic_Jewish | 10.03 |
Algerian_Jewish | 10.37 |
Greek | 10.62 |
Using 2 populations approximation: | |||||||||
1 50% Central_Greek +50% South_Italian @ 5.471951 | |||||||||
Using 3 populations approximation: | |||||||||
1 50% Central_Greek +25% Cyprian +25% Italian_Abruzzo @ 5.225592 | |||||||||
Using 4 populations approximation: | |||||||||
1 Algerian_Jewish + Armenian + North_Italian + South_Italian @ 4.703165 | |||||||||
2 Armenian + Italian_Jewish + North_Italian + South_Italian @ 4.792818 | |||||||||
3 Algerian_Jewish + Armenian + Central_Greek + North_Italian @ 4.795398 | |||||||||
4 Algerian_Jewish + Armenian + Greek + Tuscan @ 4.940431 | |||||||||
5 Armenian + Greek + Italian_Jewish + Tuscan @ 4.969768 |
It is impressive that you score a very low Red Sea, kinda like a French or an German. For example I score 3% instead.
Population Percent East_Med 30.31 West_Med 17.77 West_Asian 17.34 Atlantic 12.77 North_Sea 9.65 Baltic 4.01 Eastern_Euro 3.49 Red_Sea 1.73 Northeast_African 1.23 Oceanian 1.09 Sub-Saharan 0.6 Population (source) Distance South_Italian 5.19 Central_Greek 5.69 East_Sicilian 6.66 Italian_Abruzzo 7.68 West_Sicilian 8.79 Italian_Jewish 8.8 Ashkenazi 8.99 Sephardic_Jewish 10.03 Algerian_Jewish 10.37 Greek 10.62
Using 2 populations approximation: 1 50% Central_Greek +50% South_Italian @ 5.471951 Using 3 populations approximation: 1 50% Central_Greek +25% Cyprian +25% Italian_Abruzzo @ 5.225592 Using 4 populations approximation: 1 Algerian_Jewish + Armenian + North_Italian + South_Italian @ 4.703165 2 Armenian + Italian_Jewish + North_Italian + South_Italian @ 4.792818 3 Algerian_Jewish + Armenian + Central_Greek + North_Italian @ 4.795398 4 Algerian_Jewish + Armenian + Greek + Tuscan @ 4.940431 5 Armenian + Greek + Italian_Jewish + Tuscan @ 4.969768
More likely North Western Italian judging by his countries, since there are town near of him that are Lombard or part so, like Randazzo, Maniace etc. At the same time, i also myself score high East Euro and Baltic admix (on Eurogenes K13 the last component is almost 12%) and my Y-DNA is common in the Balkans but I've find contacts from Germany and even England. Strange, really strange.^ Looks like his North Sea and Baltic are taking away from his Red Sea. Everything else seems about right. Might mean Norman Ancestry.
Indeed, I agree and the results can change from calculator to calculator. My results have variation, for example on my DNA Land I score 31% Balkan while on 23andme I've 5%, at the same time on this last tool I'm mostly Italian, close to 90+%.There are always going to be slight variations, even between siblings and other family members. I don't think there is enough appreciation for how much chance comes into all of this when you're looking not at averages but at an individual's results.
All this over-interpretation of results and trying to correlate them with specific historical events is highly problematic.
I know that probably because of gedmatch Admixture calculators are very popular, but they're not easy to interpret and, in fact, very easy to misinterpret.
You also need to look at formal stats to get a more complete picture.
It is interesting that in the Fiorito's IBDs the first Italian region is not Basilicata and Calabria who makes more sense for geography and history but Liguria. A signal of North Italian settlements for sure judging also by the position of Val d'Aosta.In Joey's case, given the location of his ancestral area, northwestern Italians are probably a better bet, but it might just be chance.
This thread has been viewed 73554 times.