Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum

View Poll Results: What language did Haplogroup I1-bearing peoples speak most frequently before IE?

Voters
39. You may not vote on this poll
  • Basque or a language related to Basque

    6 15.38%
  • Iberian or a language related to Iberian

    2 5.13%
  • Elamite or a language related to Elamite

    0 0%
  • Sumerian or a language related to Sumerian

    0 0%
  • Minoan, Linear A, and/or a related language

    1 2.56%
  • Etruscan and/or a Tyrsenian language

    1 2.56%
  • A Semitic language (e.g. Phoenician, Aramaic, Babylonian)

    1 2.56%
  • An Afro-Asiatic language other than a Semitic one

    1 2.56%
  • A Turkic language

    1 2.56%
  • A Uralic language

    3 7.69%
  • A Caucasian language

    6 15.38%
  • Some other language (specify in comments)

    1 2.56%
  • Some other language that has been completely lost

    14 35.90%
  • The question is fallacious - I1 peoples have spoken IE from the very earliest days of PIE

    2 5.13%
Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Poll: What language did I1-bearing peoples speak most frequently before IE?

  1. #1
    Elite member
    Join Date
    23-03-15
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    328

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R-M222 (NW Irish)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H1bi

    Ethnic group
    Scots Appalachian ("Hillbilly")
    Country: USA - Virginia



    Poll: What language did I1-bearing peoples speak most frequently before IE?

    What language did Haplogroup I1-bearing peoples speak most frequently before Indo-European? I am looking for your own opinion and/or speculation based on what you know of the research. Nobody is going to be called out on the correctness of their answer.

    If you believe that I1 peoples spoke dialects of one of the answers below that were sufficiently divergent to be considered separate but related languages, pick the category anyway. No nitpicking please, thanks!

  2. #2
    Advisor LeBrok's Avatar
    Join Date
    18-11-09
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,296

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b Z2109
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H1c

    Ethnic group
    Citizen of the world
    Country: Canada-Alberta



    1 members found this post helpful.
    Quote Originally Posted by RobertColumbia View Post
    What language did Haplogroup I1-bearing peoples speak most frequently before Indo-European? I am looking for your own opinion and/or speculation based on what you know of the research. Nobody is going to be called out on the correctness of their answer.

    If you believe that I1 peoples spoke dialects of one of the answers below that were sufficiently divergent to be considered separate but related languages, pick the category anyway. No nitpicking please, thanks!
    In south central Europe they spoke farmer language. I1 was found in Hungary in late neolithic in agricultural setting, IIRC. In Scandinavia they spoke one or many hunter-gatherer languages, I guess. Either one is unknown and lost forever.
    Be wary of people who tend to glorify the past, underestimate the present, and demonize the future.

  3. #3
    Elite member arvistro's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-08-14
    Posts
    1,004


    Country: Latvia



    I put Basque as proxy for farmer languages.

    Before that they spoke now dead language.

  4. #4
    Elite member
    Join Date
    14-11-10
    Posts
    2,508

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1a1a1
    MtDNA haplogroup
    HV2a1 +G13708A

    Ethnic group
    Kurdish
    Country: Germany



    Quote Originally Posted by arvistro View Post
    I put Basque as proxy for farmer languages.

    Before that they spoke now dead language.
    Me too, there was always supposed connection between Basque and West Caucasian languages (both have ergativity) but could never been proven by genetics because people thought most of their ancestry is paleolithic European and therefore thrown away. Now we know that most of it is definitely Neolithic farmer ancestry + Western H&G. Therefore I see Basque as some kind of farmer languages.

  5. #5
    Regular Member Fluffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-11-14
    Posts
    179

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    G2a l497 s10458
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H1n

    Ethnic group
    Dutch / French
    Country: Canada-Ontario



    Went with Basque or something related to Basque.
    Species adapt to their environment,
    and those who do so best (the fittest) survive and prosper the most.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    18-04-14
    Posts
    697


    Country: Poland



    I vote for euskara.
    The poll is to big.
    Half of options is bizzare.
    Second half is about languages, about which we
    dont know very much, so hipothezizing about this
    possibilites is to risky, if not total fantazy.

    Quote Originally Posted by LeBrok View Post
    In south central Europe they spoke farmer language.
    It is LeBrok unproofable statement.
    You schould first define, what it is farmer language.
    If not - this is fantasy.

    they spoke one or many hunter-gatherer languages, I guess. Either one is unknown and lost forever.
    The same as above.
    do you think that they were totaly different
    families or where connecting to each other?


    I guess, that every one who vote for example for basks, has in mind
    probably many dialects of different languages related to him. As I too.
    But at the beginning was one, wich we called today baskian...

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    17-03-13
    Posts
    770


    Country: Sweden



    1 members found this post helpful.
    http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads...olithic-Sweden


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitted_Ware_culture
    Language

    As the language left no records, its linguistic affiliations are uncertain. It has been suggested that its people spoke a language related to the Uralic languages and provided the unique linguistic features discussed in the Germanic substrate hypothesis.

  8. #8
    Regular Member EAB's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-09-15
    Posts
    23


    Country: United Kingdom



    1 members found this post helpful.
    It is a very fun question to delve into. First off, humans as we know weren't alone in Europe when they arrived, Neanderthals were there. We don't know how they communicated, but they must have had some way, even if intuitive. However, for modern humans, I would imagine it wasn't so simple as one language, bearing in mind the size of Europe and distances involved between finds. For example, there would be a high risk of children being left with dead parents. High risk of death in childbirth plus high risk of death in hunting. This may well have brought a phenomenon of some people not speaking any language at all, and a massive regression. In small groups, it wouldn't be uncommon for them to make codes of some description. Essentially even if people were of the same race, it doesn't mean they liked each other when competing in similar areas. In fact, in a hunter gatherer society perhaps your brother is the biggest problem you have. Talking a similar language could have been the worst thing to do. There are many reason for codes, but one example of a current day code is in Listerland in Southern Sweden where they have different counting systems in a small area, made for fisherman to duck the former royal quota back in the old days. It meant you could talk at the dock and not have your neighbour tell on you. The utility of this is clear, and how often can this be developed? Twins often make their own language. Whistling, bird noises etc have all been used to communicate when reduced to a hunter gatherer paradigm. Aboriginies had over 200 languages when the English came to Australia, when the population was under 100,000. In a similar paridigm of life style, perhaps there were so many languages.

    The grammar in some extinct Aboriginal languages was so strange and different from the English way of thinking, it is hard to say if we ever understood how they thought, regardless of what language they spoke. This is demonstrated to a lesser extent by a tribe in Brazil of about 300 people. A linguist was sent over (helpfully) to learn their language, and translate it into the bible. You'd have expected these hunter gatherers to be more grateful for this unsolicited gift of confusing fairy tales. The biggest problem was this culture didn't have writing, and didn't have a concept of the past. It brought the conversation down to this level, "Jesus is great and died for you." "Did you meet him?" "No." "Then stop telling us about him or we will kill you." The linguist wanted to reach the tribe on an emotional and spiritual level, which they didn't have, by explaining to them why he loved Jesus so much. His story went as follows, "When my auntie was very sad, she killed herself. The trauma of this..." "Wait, what did you say?" "My auntie killed herself." *laughter* "Why are you laughing, this was very sad for me?" "Why did she kill herself? That is the stupidest thing we ever heard."

    These people were almost never depressed and couldn't understand why someone could kill themselves because their lives were so busy and focused in the moment. They had wild animals or other tribes try to kill them, but kill themselves? Ridiculous.

    Perhaps the languages of the original people who came to Europe might not have made sense to us because their way of life was so different. They likely would have navigated by the stars, and thus much of their explanatory language may have been about star locations. Their beliefs were probably quite different too, if they had certain ones.

    An example of this is Druidism. This belief, similar to modern scientology, is that the soul can pass into infinite bodies and lifetimes. There can be more than one soul in a body at the same time, and when the body dies you don't die. By this virtue, why did human sacrifice matter? In fact, why did dying yourself matter?

    With these concepts of life and death, would all people have talked in a way we understood even if we could translate it?

    In Plato's story of Atlantis, he states that people had to start again, as if like orphaned children. Whilst there is no proof of Atlantis, it is a useful philosophical tool to imagine not having something you once had, and not knowing what that was. It is a bit like putting paint on your hands and trying not to get it on your face, you realise how often we do things that we don't need to do unconsciously. Perhaps the meme of modern language is something we believe we need to achieve certain tasks, when in fact there are 100 other ways of communicating. Elephants, Prairie Dogs and other animals have interesting languages which are nothing like Human constructs of what a language should be. A prairie dog can communicate a person is coming, how big they are, what colour clothes they wear and if they have seem them before in one sound. What if humans once could do something like this? Elephants communicate up to five miles away by low noises we cannot hear. What if we did something similar with a percussive sound like a drum, afterall the Native Americans put their ear to the ground to hear a stampede.

    If we can communicate in morse code, touch (braille, death dumb and blind people...) in sign language, with drums, in light, in smoke, in harmonics, in whistles etc, perhaps languages could have been like this. Maybe that is why there is no paper trail, because people explored other ways of communicating where writing was simply an abstraction.

  9. #9
    Advisor LeBrok's Avatar
    Join Date
    18-11-09
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,296

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b Z2109
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H1c

    Ethnic group
    Citizen of the world
    Country: Canada-Alberta



    Quote Originally Posted by EAB View Post
    The grammar in some extinct Aboriginal languages was so strange and different from the English way of thinking, it is hard to say if we ever understood how they thought, regardless of what language they spoke. This is demonstrated to a lesser extent by a tribe in Brazil of about 300 people. A linguist was sent over (helpfully) to learn their language, and translate it into the bible. You'd have expected these hunter gatherers to be more grateful for this unsolicited gift of confusing fairy tales. The biggest problem was this culture didn't have writing, and didn't have a concept of the past. It brought the conversation down to this level, "Jesus is great and died for you." "Did you meet him?" "No." "Then stop telling us about him or we will kill you." The linguist wanted to reach the tribe on an emotional and spiritual level, which they didn't have, by explaining to them why he loved Jesus so much. His story went as follows, "When my auntie was very sad, she killed herself. The trauma of this..." "Wait, what did you say?" "My auntie killed herself." *laughter* "Why are you laughing, this was very sad for me?" "Why did she kill herself? That is the stupidest thing we ever heard."

    These people were almost never depressed and couldn't understand why someone could kill themselves because their lives were so busy and focused in the moment. They had wild animals or other tribes try to kill them, but kill themselves? Ridiculous.

    .
    Actually there is a documented and still existent Amazon Jungle tribe whose members commit suicide. Around age of 35 they are getting bored of life and have growing desire to join their ancestors in afterlife. There are no old people in the village. They also practice infanticide of infirm kids.

  10. #10
    Regular Member EAB's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-09-15
    Posts
    23


    Country: United Kingdom



    Quote Originally Posted by LeBrok View Post
    Actually there is a documented and still existent Amazon Jungle tribe whose members commit suicide. Around age of 35 they are getting bored of life and have growing desire to join their ancestors in afterlife. There are no old people in the village. They also practice infanticide of infirm kids.
    Yes, one geographical country has tribes which we assume are only separated by a few thousand years of presumably the same Y chromosome, that do completely different things. It must have been similar to this in Europe.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    17-03-13
    Posts
    770


    Country: Sweden



    Kenneth Nordtvedt wrote (Fri,2 Oct 2015.): Seems today the BigY for an extremely early L161 branch is reported out?
    And interesting place of origin--- Turkey!

  12. #12
    Regular Member The_Lyonnist's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-10-15
    Location
    Lyon
    Posts
    22

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    I1
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H1

    Ethnic group
    Celto-germanic
    Country: France



    1 members found this post helpful.
    I1 always speak IE.

  13. #13
    Advisor Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    18,964


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York



    Quote Originally Posted by The_Lyonnist View Post
    I1 always speak IE.
    That's not possible given that an I1 autosomally EEF sample has been found. Those people would have been speaking a "farmer" language

    http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2014/09/03/008664

    http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2014/09...-of-early.html

    http://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_I1_Y-DNA.shtml
    Last edited by Angela; 29-11-15 at 21:20.


    Non si fa il proprio dovere perchè qualcuno ci dica grazie, lo si fa per principio, per se stessi, per la propria dignità. Oriana Fallaci

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    15-03-16
    Posts
    10


    Country: Norway



    why "Nostratic" language is not metioned? There is research trying to reconstruct this hypothetical language by connecting PIE, Basque, Ugrofinnic, Dravidan and Kartvelian languages

  15. #15
    Advisor bicicleur's Avatar
    Join Date
    27-01-13
    Location
    Zwevegem, Belgium
    Posts
    5,731


    Country: Belgium - Flanders



    Quote Originally Posted by Angela View Post
    That's not possible given that an I1 autosomally EEF sample has been found. Those people would have been speaking a "farmer" language

    http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2014/09/03/008664

    http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2014/09...-of-early.html

    http://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_I1_Y-DNA.shtml
    that depends on which I1 you mean
    I1 was born 27000 years ago and expanded only 4700 years ago
    that means all I1 tribes between 27000 and 4700 years ago went extinct, but one
    4700 years ago this single I1 tribe may allready have joined corded ware people and adapted its language

    Acording to Genetiker Stora Forvar 11 was also I1. He published the Y-calls and I tend to believe him.
    I think it is still more likely that the surviving I1 descended from the Hungarian EEF.
    But there may even be other I1 branches as a candidate for the surviving one.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    18-04-14
    Posts
    697


    Country: Poland



    .......................................
    Last edited by Rethel; 01-04-17 at 17:35.

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    13-04-17
    Posts
    283

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    I-Z63
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H5c

    Ethnic group
    Bošnjak
    Country: Yugoslavia



    1 members found this post helpful.
    I think they probably just growled really scary. I'm I1 and I can make really cool death metal screams, it freaks people out they think I'm possessed by a demon.

  18. #18
    Regular Member K_Sacana_Blomqvist's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-02-10
    Location
    Stockholm
    Posts
    10

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1a1a

    Ethnic group
    Polish
    Country: Sweden



    I chose an unknown language that has been lost. Unfortunately Basque seems to be the only non I.E. language that survived. An interesting issue is how the I.E. languages were affected by the original idioms that were around from time immemorial.

  19. #19
    Princess davef's Avatar
    Join Date
    19-06-16
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,239


    Ethnic group
    Italian,Irish,Jewish
    Country: USA - New York



    Quote Originally Posted by Apsurdistan View Post
    I think they probably just growled really scary. I'm I1 and I can make really cool death metal screams, it freaks people out they think I'm possessed by a demon.
    One upvote from me apsurdistan, brotha!
    mmmmmmmmm dooouuughhhnuuuutz

  20. #20
    Regular Member Zvrk9's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-18
    Posts
    65


    Country: United States



    Quote Originally Posted by bicicleur View Post
    I think it is still more likely that the surviving I1 descended from the Hungarian EEF.
    But there may even be other I1 branches as a candidate for the surviving one.
    That seems very likely to me too. In that relatively short time of I1 revival and branching out, we see different branches of I1-M253 leaving traces of movement on the west and east side of Europe, going south in some areas and far East in others. It is in so many locations following different paths or in some cases seemingly no path. Even looking down to some later haplotypes like Z58+Z63+ the distribution is difficult to explain with the movement of just one tribe like Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Anglo Saxons ...

    So, how could we assign only one language to all of them?

    The bigger mystery is what happened for 22000 years?

  21. #21
    Regular Member Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    26-11-16
    Posts
    115


    Ethnic group
    United Kingdom and Baltic
    Country: United States



    Poll: What language did I1-bearing peoples speak most frequently before IE?

    Something like a proto-Dagestanian?
    Last edited by Mark; 08-04-18 at 06:34.

  22. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    31-03-18
    Posts
    365

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    I2a2a(m223)(L801)

    Country: Albania



    Quote Originally Posted by RobertColumbia View Post
    What language did Haplogroup I1-bearing peoples speak most frequently before Indo-European? I am looking for your own opinion and/or speculation based on what you know of the research. Nobody is going to be called out on the correctness of their answer.

    If you believe that I1 peoples spoke dialects of one of the answers below that were sufficiently divergent to be considered separate but related languages, pick the category anyway. No nitpicking please, thanks!
    I would say they spoke Gibberish

  23. #23
    Regular Member Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    26-11-16
    Posts
    115


    Ethnic group
    United Kingdom and Baltic
    Country: United States



    Quote Originally Posted by Tutkun Arnaut View Post
    I would say they spoke Gibberish
    Am I to presume you would know given your fluency?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •