MOESAN
Elite member
- Messages
- 5,893
- Reaction score
- 1,294
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Brittany
- Ethnic group
- more celtic
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1b - L21/S145*
- mtDNA haplogroup
- H3c
On contrere mon frere;
Considering FireHaired a Cro-Magnoid - is even beyond the most vulgar type of diarrhea;
He is not only clearly miscegenated he is miscegenated (family tree)!!
which blatantly exposes one of us as incorrect; and its not me;
that you dont have any reflection on the tripe you spout amazes me;
to think his parents are paleolithic/mesolithic europeans > what hogwash!
I wont even bother about anthropology with you, a waste of my time;
But one point is clear, pigmentation is only a part (a rather secondary part) of Anthropology; But even these features have to be inherited in order for a direct Cro-Magnoid continuity; and this exists at best via a WHG admixture and even that is diluted;
Point is clear; Modern Cro-Magnoid is/was always a fictional romanticist term pulled out of the dernier of some french;
I answer here to your last post, just a bit more correct than the others:
- When did you read I said Fire Haired was 'cromagnoid'like in my sense? He shows for me more heritage from a 'brünnoid' type at facial level (it's to say a type where ancient prototype 'Brünn' leaved more genes); the fact he has a variated ancestry doesn't exclude a possible 'atavism' comeback to some specific features inherited from far past;
- 'Cro-Magnon' is not exactly 'cromagnoid': and 'cromagnoid' features (with strong heritage from previous 'Cro-magnon' type) exist in Europe: yes, in low proportions: it's not saying these TWO DIFFERENT old héritages are for the most WHG transmission to us: it could very well be also close cousins from North-East and East Great Europe come "back" in mixtures with I-Eans colonizations (a guess); but admixtures do not destroy genes and the features these genes conditon!
- modern types if they exist are sons of more ancient types by differenciation, or I missed something?
-pigmentation is hereditary, OK, I defend that - but it is not always the more accurate trait to establish long time connexions between types (their lignages)
to resume: there is no more a 'cromagnoid' population or a 'Brünnoid' one, but we have modern populations where their commoner traits are remained at a sufficent level to be remarked, when they are almost absent in other populations (mutations + crossings)- surely at genetic level, some remote populations where these traits are still visible at some levels are no more in relation one to another and have their globally auDNA drifted away, normal.
I say what I think, without taking myself for the gooroo of anthropology - you seem to me very proud and sure of your own knowledge?