Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I love buckwheat!Then there is buckwheat in Finland claim:
'Buckwheat is documented in Europe in Finland by at least 5300 BCE [6] as a first sign of agriculture" (wiki on buckwheat history).
Me too. But to be honest scientists are still rather cautious how to interpret results.I love buckwheat!
Me too. But to be honest scientists are still rather cautious how to interpret results.
It looks like buckwheat did not survive long, one hint is linguistic.
Balts and Slavs call buckwheat Greek (griķi, grechka), so it would be (re-?)introduced by Greeks to Slavs and mediated to Balts.
Also Finns and Estonians did not have local name and call it Tatar (tatar, tattari) as if mediated by Tatars.
Charred, furry, polar bear on a stick? :grin:
See, my card carrying feminist friends would take offense at that, but not me; I'm a cultural dinosaur. I've found that good cooking keeps not only men, but children, friends and everybody else around, too much so sometimes. If you actually enjoy cooking, it's all good.
Seriously, I'm sure some brawny he-men brought them, but ylines seem to easily get "replaced", or at least that seems to be the recurring theme from some of these papers.
As to some of your comments upthread, you're probably not aware that there's a subtext here because there are indeed some people in the amateur community who have always vehemently denied, on "racial purity" grounds, that EHG have any ENA affinity. The analyses produced have seemed to support that opinion. The same group has also and continues to vehemently object to the idea that R1a/b might have arisen anywhere in the "dark" south of the Caucasus area. It is an article of faith that R arose in and always remained in the pristine, snow covered north.
Should the latter turn out to be the case, I expect a speedy pivot to a position that it doesn't really matter where they arose because
by the time you get to the downstream clades they were completely northern European.
Once you know the motivations, the arguments proposed make a lot more sense. Sad, but true.
There is nothing wrong with part Mongoloid female ancestry. We have such girls (blondes and not so blondes with slight Saami features) and they look really charming.
But then there is a question about WHG/ANE rich R1a boys captured from Karelia to Belarus. If they got their ANE from lovely Easternesses, then were they WHG themselves? That would turn upside down what I think of R1a.
Since I realized that out of two Karelian EHGs one was Uralic looking person (the anthro description of sample that turned out R1a) and the other was (proto) Europoid (description of sample that turned out J*), I am no more sure if there is a big link between autosomal make-up and looks.
[we need NO to move somewhere far, isolate and drift alone>.
I am very open minded here. Only reason I went for it was because "NO" is very popular in nations that have East Asian. Like, for example, 90% in Han Chinese.In my opinion NO has nothing to do with the so called East Asian in Amerinds and Eskimos.
I guess, it is because y-dna tree goes like this under "F":
G is first to branch off. Then H.
Then IJ.
Then K
Then K(xLT) goes into brothers NO and P (Q, R).
Now for P to be closer to IJ than to NO, we need NO to move somewhere far, isolate and drift alone, whilst P would stay close to IJ and interact with them. Probably this is what happened if you say ANE is closer to WHG than <what three letters I can use for East Eurasian?>.
This thread has been viewed 49147 times.