Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Page 12 of 30 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 735

Thread: Illyrian and Albanian - a linguistic approach

  1. #276
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Ike's Avatar
    Join Date
    20-12-10
    Posts
    1,128
    Points
    4,720
    Level
    20
    Points: 4,720, Level: 20
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 330
    Overall activity: 3.0%


    Country: Yugoslavia





    Quote Originally Posted by ukaj View Post
    dont waste my time please.You are basing words that is not albanian when your whole language nearly is understandable in ukraine an slov.run along with your propaganda
    The way you respond to things makes one think that you've got one strange pattern going on in your head.
    What's his language correlation with Ukrainian, got to do with Albanian-Illyrian relationship? All I see is that you support the possibility (or are certain) of some languages coming to Balkan from beyond Danube, but which could also include Albanian language coming from Carpathians.

  2. #277
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by ukaj View Post
    dont waste my time please.You are basing words that is not albanian when your whole language nearly is understandable in ukraine an slov.run along with your propaganda
    It didnt come from carpathian mountains it went their through the romanians.As i said romanians at one point spoke simular language as albanian.proto albanians influenced romanian language forsure i will admit that.

  3. #278
    Regular Member Achievements:
    VeteranThree Friends25000 Experience Points
    Sile's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-09-11
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,119
    Points
    29,699
    Level
    52
    Points: 29,699, Level: 52
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 51
    Overall activity: 37.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 -Z19945..Jura
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H95a1 ..Pannoni

    Ethnic group
    North Alpine Italian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by ukaj View Post
    It didnt come from carpathian mountains it went their through the romanians.As i said romanians at one point spoke simular language as albanian.proto albanians influenced romanian language forsure i will admit that.
    Romanians did not always speak latin
    có che un pòpoło no 'l defende pi ła só łéngua el xe prónto par èser s'ciavo

    when a people no longer dares to defend its language it is ripe for slavery.

  4. #279
    Banned Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    05-09-15
    Posts
    2,071
    Points
    5,328
    Level
    21
    Points: 5,328, Level: 21
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 222
    Overall activity: 26.0%


    Ethnic group
    Albanian
    Country: Albania



    Quote Originally Posted by ukaj View Post
    It didnt come from carpathian mountains it went their through the romanians.As i said romanians at one point spoke simular language as albanian.proto albanians influenced romanian language forsure i will admit that.
    It`s not true.
    Albanians are descendants of the Illyrians, while Romanians are descendants of the Dacians. These two ancient peoples, who continue today to live in the same territory as in ancient times, were once neighboring to each other. Remember, South Slavs had not yet reached the Balkans.They were still in Asia or God know where.
    This explain why some romanian words(70 in a total of 160 words that can not be explained with latin, slav, german, hungarian or turkish) can be explained with the help of Albanian language.
    We know the contribution of Albanians in the creation of the Greek and Serb modern nations. This happened due to the assimilation of Albanian element, etc. But we can not say that Romanians are simply another Albanian diaspora as are trying to argue Hungarian nationalists. It's not true.
    We are two different nations. Once neighbouring, but always different.

  5. #280
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by LABERIA View Post
    It`s not true.
    Albanians are descendants of the Illyrians, while Romanians are descendants of the Dacians. These two ancient peoples, who continue today to live in the same territory as in ancient times, were once neighboring to each other. Remember, South Slavs had not yet reached the Balkans.They were still in Asia or God know where.
    This explain why some romanian words(70 in a total of 160 words that can not be explained with latin, slav, german, hungarian or turkish) can be explained with the help of Albanian language.
    We know the contribution of Albanians in the creation of the Greek and Serb modern nations. This happened due to the assimilation of Albanian element, etc. But we can not say that Romanians are simply another Albanian diaspora as are trying to argue Hungarian nationalists. It's not true.
    We are two different nations. Once neighbouring, but always different.
    proto albanians lived around area of mati an upwards proto romanians maye infact assimulated albanians.i didnt say we are dacians.Dr Michiel de Vaan has a preety good lecture on albanians an romanians check it up

  6. #281
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    14-12-10
    Posts
    1,603
    Points
    22,749
    Level
    46
    Points: 22,749, Level: 46
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 801
    Overall activity: 9.0%


    Country: Serbia



    Quote Originally Posted by LABERIA View Post
    It`s not true.
    Albanians are descendants of the Illyrians, while Romanians are descendants of the Dacians. These two ancient peoples, who continue today to live in the same territory as in ancient times, were once neighboring to each other. Remember, South Slavs had not yet reached the Balkans.They were still in Asia or God know where.
    This explain why some romanian words(70 in a total of 160 words that can not be explained with latin, slav, german, hungarian or turkish) can be explained with the help of Albanian language.
    We know the contribution of Albanians in the creation of the Greek and Serb modern nations. This happened due to the assimilation of Albanian element, etc. But we can not say that Romanians are simply another Albanian diaspora as are trying to argue Hungarian nationalists. It's not true.
    We are two different nations. Once neighbouring, but always different.
    Confusion is because terms Dacians and Free Dacians.

    Free Dacians were not ethnic Dacians.

    Free Dacians, Carpi, and probably Costoboci, and maybe another tribe were Albanians, probably Carpi were Gheg Albanians.

    Some tribes around Dacia were Sarmatian, German, Baltic or Slavic etc.

    In Hungarian sources someone can find that Romanians and Albanians lived together in today's Albania, but no, Romanians and Albanians (Dacians and Free Dacians) lived in Romania and beyond, for example Carpi (Free Dacian tribe) lived in Carpatian mountains today's it is mostly in province Moldova in Romania.

  7. #282
    Banned Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    05-09-15
    Posts
    2,071
    Points
    5,328
    Level
    21
    Points: 5,328, Level: 21
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 222
    Overall activity: 26.0%


    Ethnic group
    Albanian
    Country: Albania



    Quote Originally Posted by ukaj View Post
    proto albanians lived around area of mati an upwards proto romanians maye infact assimulated albanians.i didnt say we are dacians.Dr Michiel de Vaan has a preety good lecture on albanians an romanians check it up
    Again it`s not true.
    As reported by Constantine Porphyrogenitus (Emp. from 913-919), the Slavs Started to come to the Balkans from the Ural and the Caspian Sea during the reign of Emperor Heraclius (610-641). They were often led by nomadic Turks. The region, called at that time Illyria, was inhabited by the aborigine population, the Illyrians, the ancestors of the Albanians.

    It is generally admitted that the Slavs settled in the Danube area along the Dalmatian coast, and in Greece. But the question as to the exact territories occupied by them has not been elucidated as yet. From various sources - historical as well as linguistic - the conclusion may, however, be drawn that if the greatest part of the vast Illyrian territories was by the end of the 9th century already colonized by the Slavs, some areas were spared. These were Dardania, New Epirus, the southern part of Prevalitania and North Epirus. These territories correspond exactly to the region which before the Treaty of Berlin were inhabited by Albanians.

  8. #283
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    14-12-10
    Posts
    1,603
    Points
    22,749
    Level
    46
    Points: 22,749, Level: 46
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 801
    Overall activity: 9.0%


    Country: Serbia



    Quote Originally Posted by ukaj View Post
    It didnt come from carpathian mountains it went their through the romanians.As i said romanians at one point spoke simular language as albanian.proto albanians influenced romanian language forsure i will admit that.
    Romans after 167 BC were rulers of Illyricum, romanization was total and Romanian scientists consider no one big entity could not survive and preserve their uniqueness.

    It is same with Moesia and Dacia.

    We can see Roman rule of Dacia was shorter than Illyricum, Roman Dacia was from 106 till 275 AD, however the entire population within the Dacia were romanized for about one and half centuries.

    Inhabitants outside Illyricum and Dacia could preserve their uniqueness and language at least to some extent.

    Carpi and possible some another Free Dacian tribe, lived beyond Dacia, and could preserve their Albanian language, certainly receiving Latin to a certain extent, because they were on the border of empire.

  9. #284
    Regular Member Achievements:
    VeteranThree Friends25000 Experience Points
    Sile's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-09-11
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,119
    Points
    29,699
    Level
    52
    Points: 29,699, Level: 52
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 51
    Overall activity: 37.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 -Z19945..Jura
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H95a1 ..Pannoni

    Ethnic group
    North Alpine Italian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by LABERIA View Post
    It`s not true.
    Albanians are descendants of the Illyrians, while Romanians are descendants of the Dacians. These two ancient peoples, who continue today to live in the same territory as in ancient times, were once neighboring to each other. Remember, South Slavs had not yet reached the Balkans.They were still in Asia or God know where.
    This explain why some romanian words(70 in a total of 160 words that can not be explained with latin, slav, german, hungarian or turkish) can be explained with the help of Albanian language.
    We know the contribution of Albanians in the creation of the Greek and Serb modern nations. This happened due to the assimilation of Albanian element, etc. But we can not say that Romanians are simply another Albanian diaspora as are trying to argue Hungarian nationalists. It's not true.
    We are two different nations. Once neighbouring, but always different.
    it is true..........if you read by garrick and Ukaj in full it makes perfect sense..........as I said the Romanians ( proto-dacian and proto-albaian tongue ) for some reason where the only ones to drop their ancient tongue to pick up and learn Latin....... they still speak latin today, I spoke about latin to a romanian worker 2 days ago and she stated the same as what Garrick stated.

    she also said that modern romanian border in ancient times was comprised of many tribes which did not speak the same language or have same customs.............one of the reasons that latin was introduced

  10. #285
    Regular Member Achievements:
    VeteranThree Friends25000 Experience Points
    Sile's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-09-11
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,119
    Points
    29,699
    Level
    52
    Points: 29,699, Level: 52
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 51
    Overall activity: 37.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 -Z19945..Jura
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H95a1 ..Pannoni

    Ethnic group
    North Alpine Italian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by Garrick View Post
    Confusion is because terms Dacians and Free Dacians.

    Free Dacians were not ethnic Dacians.

    Free Dacians, Carpi, and probably Costoboci, and maybe another tribe were Albanians, probably Carpi were Gheg Albanians.

    Some tribes around Dacia were Sarmatian, German, Baltic or Slavic etc.

    In Hungarian sources someone can find that Romanians and Albanians lived together in today's Albania, but no, Romanians and Albanians (Dacians and Free Dacians) lived in Romania and beyond, for example Carpi (Free Dacian tribe) lived in Carpatian mountains today's it is mostly in province Moldova in Romania.
    Getae are in romania and they are not dacian

  11. #286
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by Sile View Post
    Romanians did not always speak latin
    yes you are right they didnt this is why we share alot of proto word together,Witch fits perfect in what i am saying

  12. #287
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by LABERIA View Post
    Again it`s not true.
    As reported by Constantine Porphyrogenitus (Emp. from 913-919), the Slavs Started to come to the Balkans from the Ural and the Caspian Sea during the reign of Emperor Heraclius (610-641). They were often led by nomadic Turks. The region, called at that time Illyria, was inhabited by the aborigine population, the Illyrians, the ancestors of the Albanians.

    It is generally admitted that the Slavs settled in the Danube area along the Dalmatian coast, and in Greece. But the question as to the exact territories occupied by them has not been elucidated as yet. From various sources - historical as well as linguistic - the conclusion may, however, be drawn that if the greatest part of the vast Illyrian territories was by the end of the 9th century already colonized by the Slavs, some areas were spared. These were Dardania, New Epirus, the southern part of Prevalitania and North Epirus. These territories correspond exactly to the region which before the Treaty of Berlin were inhabited by Albanians.
    My friend it is very true.the albanian language started above the jirecek line our language tells us so.Most of the illyrians tribes were northern part dalmate.albanians migrated to epirus as early as the 12th,13th ctry,the first migration was from shkodra into southern part then into greece.The albanians were given land for being good mercenaries to the byzantine,albanians populated the depopulatedlands in epirus..when slavs migrated into balkans was 3 hot spots,thessalika,bosnia,croatia

  13. #288
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by Sile View Post
    it is true..........if you read by garrick and Ukaj in full it makes perfect sense..........as I said the Romanians ( proto-dacian and proto-albaian tongue ) for some reason where the only ones to drop their ancient tongue to pick up and learn Latin....... they still speak latin today, I spoke about latin to a romanian worker 2 days ago and she stated the same as what Garrick stated.

    she also said that modern romanian border in ancient times was comprised of many tribes which did not speak the same language or have same customs.............one of the reasons that latin was introduced
    proto albanians didnt live in carpathians but proto romanians lived in north part of illyria next to proto albanians

  14. #289
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by Garrick View Post
    Romans after 167 BC were rulers of Illyricum, romanization was total and Romanian scientists consider no one big entity could not survive and preserve their uniqueness.

    It is same with Moesia and Dacia.

    We can see Roman rule of Dacia was shorter than Illyricum, Roman Dacia was from 106 till 275 AD, however the entire population within the Dacia were romanized for about one and half centuries.

    Inhabitants outside Illyricum and Dacia could preserve their uniqueness and language at least to some extent.

    Carpi and possible some another Free Dacian tribe, lived beyond Dacia, and could preserve their Albanian language, certainly receiving Latin to a certain extent, because they were on the border of empire.
    garrik albanians has no relations to carpathia if you know about carpathian moutains then you will know that slavs migrated their from caucasus then into balkans,the romanians are a dacian people that pre date slavs.Why do you think their is a high percent of slavnic language in romanians now?It was assimulation bye the slavs working their way down into what is today serbia,bosnia,croatia etc.stop with rubbish.all surrounding countrys around romania are all slavs or germanic with would be normal fro slavs to assimulate.our language is not fully assimulated but romanians has alot with slav.if we were from carpathians then ours would be more slav an its not,,stop with theory

  15. #290
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by Sile View Post
    it is true..........if you read by garrick and Ukaj in full it makes perfect sense..........as I said the Romanians ( proto-dacian and proto-albaian tongue ) for some reason where the only ones to drop their ancient tongue to pick up and learn Latin....... they still speak latin today, I spoke about latin to a romanian worker 2 days ago and she stated the same as what Garrick stated.

    she also said that modern romanian border in ancient times was comprised of many tribes which did not speak the same language or have same customs.............one of the reasons that latin was introduced
    again proto albanians lived close to proto romanians.some say proto romanian language came from proto albanians but albanian didnt fully assimulate to a romance language,but you can not base it on where romanians live now that is silly..they came in contact in northern part of albania witch would have bordered some dacians.

  16. #291
    Regular Member Achievements:
    VeteranThree Friends25000 Experience Points
    Sile's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-09-11
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,119
    Points
    29,699
    Level
    52
    Points: 29,699, Level: 52
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 51
    Overall activity: 37.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 -Z19945..Jura
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H95a1 ..Pannoni

    Ethnic group
    North Alpine Italian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by ukaj View Post
    garrik albanians has no relations to carpathia if you know about carpathian moutains then you will know that slavs migrated their from caucasus then into balkans,the romanians are a dacian people that pre date slavs.Why do you think their is a high percent of slavnic language in romanians now?It was assimulation bye the slavs working their way down into what is today serbia,bosnia,croatia etc.stop with rubbish.all surrounding countrys around romania are all slavs or germanic with would be normal fro slavs to assimulate.our language is not fully assimulated but romanians has alot with slav.if we were from carpathians then ours would be more slav an its not,,stop with theory
    the slavs migrated to the carpathians mountains not before 400AD or else the Romans would have noted them

  17. #292
    Banned Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    05-09-15
    Posts
    2,071
    Points
    5,328
    Level
    21
    Points: 5,328, Level: 21
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 222
    Overall activity: 26.0%


    Ethnic group
    Albanian
    Country: Albania



    Quote Originally Posted by ukaj View Post
    My friend it is very true.the albanian language started above the jirecek line our language tells us so.Most of the illyrians tribes were northern part dalmate.albanians migrated to epirus as early as the 12th,13th ctry,the first migration was from shkodra into southern part then into greece.The albanians were given land for being good mercenaries to the byzantine,albanians populated the depopulatedlands in epirus..when slavs migrated into balkans was 3 hot spots,thessalika,bosnia,croatia
    Again it`s not true. Albanians are autoctonus in Epir, i.e. South Albania. The migration of Albanians in Greece was from Epir and not from North Albania. Exactly the albanian language who don`t confirm your theory.
    Dialectological_chart_of_Albanian.jpg
    As you can see, all the dialects of Arvanites in Greece are Tosk dialects, South Albania.

  18. #293
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Ike's Avatar
    Join Date
    20-12-10
    Posts
    1,128
    Points
    4,720
    Level
    20
    Points: 4,720, Level: 20
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 330
    Overall activity: 3.0%


    Country: Yugoslavia



    Quote Originally Posted by LABERIA View Post
    Again it`s not true.
    As reported by Constantine Porphyrogenitus (Emp. from 913-919), the Slavs Started to come to the Balkans from the Ural and the Caspian Sea during the reign of Emperor Heraclius (610-641). They were often led by nomadic Turks. The region, called at that time Illyria, was inhabited by the aborigine population, the Illyrians, the ancestors of the Albanians.
    That same Constantine also said that the whole area was desolated, so drop your hopes with his text.

    It is generally admitted that the Slavs settled in the Danube area along the Dalmatian coast, and in Greece. But the question as to the exact territories occupied by them has not been elucidated as yet. From various sources - historical as well as linguistic - the conclusion may, however, be drawn that if the greatest part of the vast Illyrian territories was by the end of the 9th century already colonized by the Slavs, some areas were spared. These were Dardania, New Epirus, the southern part of Prevalitania and North Epirus. These territories correspond exactly to the region which before the Treaty of Berlin were inhabited by Albanians.
    No they don't. You have not a single evidence to support that claim. They are just your wishful thinking.

  19. #294
    Regular Member Achievements:
    VeteranThree Friends25000 Experience Points
    Sile's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-09-11
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,119
    Points
    29,699
    Level
    52
    Points: 29,699, Level: 52
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 51
    Overall activity: 37.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 -Z19945..Jura
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H95a1 ..Pannoni

    Ethnic group
    North Alpine Italian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by LABERIA View Post
    Again it`s not true.
    As reported by Constantine Porphyrogenitus (Emp. from 913-919), the Slavs Started to come to the Balkans from the Ural and the Caspian Sea during the reign of Emperor Heraclius (610-641). They were often led by nomadic Turks. The region, called at that time Illyria, was inhabited by the aborigine population, the Illyrians, the ancestors of the Albanians.

    It is generally admitted that the Slavs settled in the Danube area along the Dalmatian coast, and in Greece. But the question as to the exact territories occupied by them has not been elucidated as yet. From various sources - historical as well as linguistic - the conclusion may, however, be drawn that if the greatest part of the vast Illyrian territories was by the end of the 9th century already colonized by the Slavs, some areas were spared. These were Dardania, New Epirus, the southern part of Prevalitania and North Epirus. These territories correspond exactly to the region which before the Treaty of Berlin were inhabited by Albanians.
    from the danube area ( whatever that means ) to the dalmatian coast is over 250kms..................what are you trying to say?

  20. #295
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by LABERIA View Post
    Again it`s not true. Albanians are autoctonus in Epir, i.e. South Albania. The migration of Albanians in Greece was from Epir and not from North Albania. Exactly the albanian language who don`t confirm your theory.
    Dialectological_chart_of_Albanian.jpg
    As you can see, all the dialects of Arvanites in Greece are Tosk dialects, South Albania.
    my friend no disrespect. but you are wrong.the proto albanians were in north present day mati to montenegro.Do you belive all arbanties are all tosks?This would be silly or you to say as in the 14ctry most dilect spoken was gheg,marin barteli moved to italia an spoke gheg albanian an was from shkodra,What you think would happen to the albanian language when it came in contact with greek language an tribes?The same thing that happen to arbanties a change of language using greek aplhabet completely wiped out the gheg albanian.Tosk albanian is not as old as gheg albanian i already talked with others about this,An if arbreshe an arbanties are tosks then the genetic marker of eb1 in arbaties would not be the same as gheg albanians but it is,as i said gheg albanians from shkodra migrated in greece in 13ctry.The albanian catholics from north albania to central migrated to morea then into italia not all only the nobles migrated.The albanian catholics who remained are the catholics today in north albania who had their taxes payed by the albanians who settled in italia an the pope also an one of the only albanian people who remained catholic not except orthodox again after the ottomans as many tosks did.This is why they are still catholics.If you look at history 90% of south albania were under the ottoman empire fighting other albanians to regain their freedom this is one of the reasons we started to use the kanuni again, albanians to north were not under the ottomans when greece an south albania were.WHY AN HOW did the arbanties who as you say are tosk migrate to epirus when the ottmoan wars were on An the ottoman already occupy greece an south albania?Their would be no such migration of arbanties into greece when south were already under the ottmans.when scanderbeg passed an the catholics were defeated this is when all the migration took place also.so no vlle times of the migrations fit perfect of the gheg catholics or in general northern ghegs.remember 25yrs after castriota passed we were not under the ottomans to the north,dukagjini took his place an led the ghegs to war
    Last edited by ukaj; 09-01-16 at 10:53.

  21. #296
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by Sile View Post
    the slavs migrated to the carpathians mountains not before 400AD or else the Romans would have noted them
    Attachment 7589
    Slavs were recorder by the greeks an romans.slavs were already settled in carpathians.but before that their were vandals in carpathian mountains,The albanio were already mention in albania before 6ctry.ther theory of albanian been from carpathian mountains is so wrong in many ways it doesnt fit the times of the indigenous names we have of certain places in albania montenegro.

  22. #297
    Banned Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    05-09-15
    Posts
    2,071
    Points
    5,328
    Level
    21
    Points: 5,328, Level: 21
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 222
    Overall activity: 26.0%


    Ethnic group
    Albanian
    Country: Albania



    Quote Originally Posted by ukaj View Post
    my friend no disrespect. but you are wrong.the proto albanians were in north present day mati to montenegro.Do you belive all arbanties are all tosks?This would be silly or you to say as in the 14ctry most dilect spoken was gheg,marin barteli moved to italia an spoke gheg albanian an was from shkodra,What you think would happen to the albanian language when it came in contact with greek language an tribes?The same thing that happen to arbanties a change of language using greek aplhabet completely wiped out the gheg albanian.Tosk albanian is not as old as gheg albanian i already talked with others about this,An if arbreshe an arbanties are tosks then the genetic marker of eb1 in arbaties would not be the same as gheg albanians but it is,as i said gheg albanians from shkodra migrated in greece in 13ctry.The albanian catholics from north albania to central migrated to morea then into italia not all only the nobles migrated.The albanian catholics who remained are the catholics today in north albania who had their taxes payed by the albanians who settled in italia an the pope also an one of the only albanian people who remained catholic not except orthodox again after the ottomans as many tosks did.This is why they are still catholics.If you look at history 90% of south albania were under the ottoman empire fighting other albanians to regain their freedom this is one of the reasons we started to use the kanuni again, albanians to north were not under the ottomans when greece an south albania were.WHY AN HOW did the arbanties who as you say are tosk migrate to epirus when the ottmoan wars were on An the ottoman already occupy greece an south albania?Their would be no such migration of arbanties into greece when south were already under the ottmans.when scanderbeg passed an the catholics were defeated this is when all the migration took place also.so no vlle times of the migrations fit perfect of the gheg catholics or in general northern ghegs.remember 25yrs after castriota passed we were not under the ottomans to the north,dukagjini took his place an led the ghegs to war
    Your post is nonsense. I know very well when started the migration of Albanians in Greece, where they settled, from which part of Albania were this Albanians etc.
    But my question is only one and you didn't answer to me:
    How do you explain that the Albanian spoken by Arvanite, i. e. Albanians in Greece, are subdialects of Tosk and not Geg dialect? I am interested about this. Can you give me answer pls?
    About the occupation of South Albania by Ottomans etc, it's evident that you don't know the situation at that period of time.

  23. #298
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by LABERIA View Post
    Your post is nonsense. I know very well when started the migration of Albanians in Greece, where they settled, from which part of Albania were this Albanians etc.
    But my question is only one and you didn't answer to me:
    How do you explain that the Albanian spoken by Arvanite, i. e. Albanians in Greece, are subdialects of Tosk and not Geg dialect? I am interested about this. Can you give me answer pls?
    About the occupation of South Albania by Ottomans etc, it's evident that you don't know the situation at that period of time.
    oh my vella same way as why do arbreshe speak diffrent dilect to arbanties now because of the influence of italian.I know very well what happen in southern albania.an how can you say its nonsence when i told you marin barteli left for italia an many others who were catholic like the bishop of durres WHO WERE GHEGS.Tosk came about in the time they came in contact with greeks.
    If you know when an where albanians migrated from then you would know about the albanians from shkodra that migrated to greece in 13ctry,,i suppose they tosks to lmao..if you belive im wrong then show me tosk written in 14ctry.next you going to tell me castriota was tosk.REMEBER TOSKS WERE NOT CATHOLICS BUT ORTHODOX use didnt change you religion like we did from orthodox to catholic.TOSK IS A PRODUCT OF GHEG LANGUAGE MIXED WITH GREEK ALPHABET.The treatyof shkodra was ratified in Venice on April 25, 1479.The Shkodrans in the castle had to choose between emigrating to Venice or dwelling under the rule of their enemies. Marin Barleti records that every citizen chose emigration. Babinger records that, after the 1479 peace treaty, the old Albanian families "such as the Arianiti, the Dukagjins, the Castriotas, the Musachi, and the Topias were obliged to take refuge in Naples, Venice, or northern Italy.Many Albanians, however, did remain in their fatherland. Some espoused Islam and some retreated deeper into the mountains and organized occasional uprisings, maintaining a "rigorous resistance" against the Ottomans until well into the seventeenth century.Both the besieged and the besiegers acknowledged both victory and loss. The Shkodran garrison indeed withstood the military assault, but they eventually lost and left the city; whereas the Ottomans indeed gained the city, but only after failing to conquer it by military force and sustaining significant casualties.PS ARBANTIES AN ARBRESHE STILL SHARE GHEG THAT IS NOT IN TOSK,aswell with tosk use have words we dont that use share.dont beive all arbreshe an arbanties are tosks who ever told you this has really talked rubbish


  24. #299
    Banned Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    05-09-15
    Posts
    2,071
    Points
    5,328
    Level
    21
    Points: 5,328, Level: 21
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 222
    Overall activity: 26.0%


    Ethnic group
    Albanian
    Country: Albania



    Quote Originally Posted by ukaj View Post
    oh my vella same way as why do arbreshe speak diffrent dilect to arbanties now because of the influence of italian.I know very well what happen in southern albania.an how can you say its nonsence when i told you marin barteli left for italia an many others who were catholic like the bishop of durres WHO WERE GHEGS.Tosk came about in the time they came in contact with greeks.
    If you know when an where albanians migrated from then you would know about the albanians from shkodra that migrated to greece in 13ctry,,i suppose they tosks to lmao..if you belive im wrong then show me tosk written in 14ctry.next you going to tell me castriota was tosk.REMEBER TOSKS WERE NOT CATHOLICS BUT ORTHODOX use didnt change you religion like we did from orthodox to catholic.TOSK IS A PRODUCT OF GHEG LANGUAGE MIXED WITH GREEK ALPHABET.
    You didn't answer to my direct question. I don't know what have to do Marin Barleti and not barteli, what have to do the bishop of Durres Pal Engjelli, with my question. I did not said that inhabitants of Shkodra or Scanderbeg are tosk. NO.
    It's evident that you are not an Albanian. This is not only my opinion but also the opinion of other Albanian members here in this forum. You are playing the same game, like the "famous" Arban Hoti. And also you are doing this filthy game with the same nick in another forum, Historum. It's the duty of the mods to give a right solution to your problem.

  25. #300
    Forced to be australian Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    04-06-13
    Location
    from shkodra working in australia
    Posts
    285
    Points
    2,865
    Level
    15
    Points: 2,865, Level: 15
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 2.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    e1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    m78

    Ethnic group
    albanian
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by LABERIA View Post
    You didn't answer to my direct question. I don't know what have to do Marin Barleti and not barteli, what have to do the bishop of Durres Pal Engjelli, with my question. I did not said that inhabitants of Shkodra or Scanderbeg are tosk. NO.
    It's evident that you are not an Albanian. This is not only my opinion but also the opinion of other Albanian members here in this forum. You are playing the same game, like the "famous" Arban Hoti. And also you are doing this filthy game with the same nick in another forum, Historum. It's the duty of the mods to give a right solution to your problem.
    I think i did answer your question but you must not have read right. Pal Engjelli,castriota.marin barleti.they all ghegs an all who left albania.Your question is answered right their vlla..You said basicly the people of arbreshe an arbantie mind you ARBON<<GHEG are all tosks.who speak tosk..so now my question what happen to the gheg dilect of arbreshe an arbanite?Im very albanian my surname is more albanian than albanian vlla it is proto albanian infact.DEM.Im doing what albanians should do speak the truth.The problem is that albanians can not agree on 1 thing.i am telling you know as i said proto albanians come from northern albania we did border with romanian at one point.an our language was influenced by latina an greek.The reason why im not albanian is because im not tosk like most of use hear an you dont want to hea anything what a gheg speaks.I am sorry i make you mad but you dont agree with what i say because of land issues..clearly you you disagree with me because i am talking about gheg,an you cant answer my questions at all but be negitive because i am speaking of albanian gheg who have a right that was lost but the arigance of tosk albanians,,as my father said tosks are arrigant.an one last thing i reallydont care if people dont think im albanian infact makes me lough.my name isnt armet or mehmet.its pure shqypni



Page 12 of 30 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •