Fire Haired14
Banned
- Messages
- 2,185
- Reaction score
- 582
- Points
- 0
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1b DF27*
- mtDNA haplogroup
- U5b2a2b1
Comparing Bronze age Jordan to Modern SW Asia/N Africa
This model works well for SW Asia/North Africa.
Highlights.
>Extra load of ancient Iranian admixture in SW Asia and Egypt and Ashkenazi Jews(meaning admixture is at least 2,000 years old).
>Extra African admixture in most of SW Asia and a big load in North Africa.
>WHG admixture in Morocco. Could recently be from Spain or represent older admixture from Spain.
>Similar amount of ancient Iranian admixture in Morocco as in Bronze age Jordan. Moroccans ancestors mostly arrived sometime between 9000 BC and 3000 BC from Levant, mixed with Africans(Yoruba) and Europeans(WHG), and have been isolated since then?
So you can see modern SW Asia has significantly more ancient Iran-related admixture. Ashkenazi Jews show the same extra amount of Iran-related admixture. Since their ancestors left the Levant some 2,000 years ago, it means this admixture can't be too recent. When Iran_Chl is replaced by Iran_Neo, modern and Bronze age SW Asia/North Africa still prefer ancient Iran(Iran_Neo) over ancient Caucasus(Satsurblia) which is interesting. It could mean admixture came directly from Iran.
Iran_Chl had lots of Levant_N/Anatolia_N-related and CHG-related admixture. It's very differnt from Iran_Neo. So SW Asia/North Africa is definitely mostly descended of Levant_N/Anatolia_N-like people.
Levant_N had some African admixture, but there's definitely more African admixture in modern SW Asia/North Africa. More African admixture than was in the Bronze age individual from Jordan. It looks like there might also be Steppe/Eastern_HG admixture.
This model works well for SW Asia/North Africa.
Highlights.
>Extra load of ancient Iranian admixture in SW Asia and Egypt and Ashkenazi Jews(meaning admixture is at least 2,000 years old).
>Extra African admixture in most of SW Asia and a big load in North Africa.
>WHG admixture in Morocco. Could recently be from Spain or represent older admixture from Spain.
>Similar amount of ancient Iranian admixture in Morocco as in Bronze age Jordan. Moroccans ancestors mostly arrived sometime between 9000 BC and 3000 BC from Levant, mixed with Africans(Yoruba) and Europeans(WHG), and have been isolated since then?
Eastern_HG | Satsurblia | Levant_Neolithic | Iran_Chalcolithic | Hungary_HG | India_South | Nganasan | Yoruba | ||
Jordan_EBA | 2.9 | 0 | 62.35 | 34.75 | 0 | ----- | ----- | 0 | 0.00756 |
Druze | 5.3 | 2.7 | 36.3 | 54.5 | 0.8 | ----- | ----- | 0.4 | 0.014096 |
BedouinB | 2.85 | 0 | 43.25 | 48.5 | 0 | ----- | ----- | 5.4 | 0.01321 |
Egyptian | 2.55 | 0 | 41.4 | 43.3 | 1.05 | ----- | ----- | 11.7 | 0.014943 |
Lebanese_Christian | 2.7 | 0 | 35.25 | 58.65 | 3.4 | ----- | ----- | 0 | 0.015177 |
Lebanese_Muslim | 5.4 | 0.5 | 32 | 59.55 | 0.85 | ----- | ----- | 1.7 | 0.013334 |
Moroccan | 2.2 | 1.1 | 49.25 | 21.6 | 5.3 | ----- | ----- | 20.55 | 0.014024 |
So you can see modern SW Asia has significantly more ancient Iran-related admixture. Ashkenazi Jews show the same extra amount of Iran-related admixture. Since their ancestors left the Levant some 2,000 years ago, it means this admixture can't be too recent. When Iran_Chl is replaced by Iran_Neo, modern and Bronze age SW Asia/North Africa still prefer ancient Iran(Iran_Neo) over ancient Caucasus(Satsurblia) which is interesting. It could mean admixture came directly from Iran.
Iran_Chl had lots of Levant_N/Anatolia_N-related and CHG-related admixture. It's very differnt from Iran_Neo. So SW Asia/North Africa is definitely mostly descended of Levant_N/Anatolia_N-like people.
Levant_N had some African admixture, but there's definitely more African admixture in modern SW Asia/North Africa. More African admixture than was in the Bronze age individual from Jordan. It looks like there might also be Steppe/Eastern_HG admixture.