Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, the polls nationally show an even race. I wouldn't have believed it. It's too early to tell if these recent terror attacks will change things. If not, it will all depend on the debates and whether he can keep his mouth shut, and on any "October surprises".
Twilight, your links don't work.
However, just in general it seems to me that this campaign has devolved, as some pundit said, into a campaign about "nothing". No one is paying attention to specific policy proposals it seems. It's down to personality, to perception about the people involved. Can she make him, with a lot of help from him, seem uninformed, unstable, temperamentally unsuited to be President of the U.S.? Can he make her look corrupt, weak, ineffectual, perhaps physically incapable of doing the job? Which one does a better job of that?
I have to say, if I were his campaign staff, I'd make a commercial out of this clip of Clinton reacting to the Chelsea bombings. She looks either drunk or like someone who took an ambien and had to be woken up out of her chemical sleep. Crises don't just happen during the day. The question I'd pose in the ad would be, "Is this the person you want to be in charge of some catastrophe that happens in the middle of the night"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKA9L6IQvoQ
I think he is going to make a big damage to his "TRUMP" brand. Most people will remember him now as a ignorant, racist, bigot and a cheat. Stay in Trump Tower, Trump Stake, Trump "University", anyone, anyone?!
Calling a Miss Venezuela Miss Piggy, and getting up at three a.m. to tweet that people should look for her sex tape may have finally cooked Trump's goose. He's now definitely viewed less favorably than Clinton, which is some feat, because she's about as low as you can get.
The irony is that he's sabotaged himself. If he had been able to control his craziness for just another three weeks, I think he would have won. In that last week leading up to the debate, I was hearing more and more people saying they actually might vote for him after all.
Voting for Johnson is looking more and more attractive. The following scenario, where it goes to the House of Representatives, is far-fetched, but oh, would it be fun, and maybe Johnson could actually win in that scenario.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features...to-the-2016-campaign-runs-through-new-mexico/
there is truth to what SJWs say about privilege
SJWs being racist towards whites, is a formula for racial progress in America.
I think he is going to make a big damage to his "TRUMP" brand. Most people will remember him now as a ignorant, racist, bigot and a cheat. Stay in Trump Tower, Trump Stake, Trump "University", anyone, anyone?!
Which one - Asian or Jewish?
No room for Black progress in the U.S. left, they already reached their innate potential:
https://thewinnower.com/papers/esti...mpact-of-socioeconomic-factors-and-migrations
Even though some people falsified scientific data just to prove that everyone is equal:
http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001071
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v474/n7352/full/474419a.html
http://www.livinganthropologically.com/2011/06/14/mismeasuring-gould/
Gould falsified data about Black cranial capacity just to prove that they have lower IQ because of White racism, and not because of having lower average cranial capacities. I wonder how many "Whiteys" were killed by Blacks because those Blacks blamed them for their failures, instead of blaming their own low cranial capacity?
Now you are doing the same as Gould, justifying racism against "Whiteys" just to achieve some "racial progress", which will not happen anyway.
This thread has been viewed 707935 times.