Help with understanding my test results

The text says that Belochrovati were near Francia, subjects to king Otto, so within Holy Roman Empire but also near the 'Turks' (=Magyars) with whom they had good relations. I believe, even Austria is possible.
Also, apart from the name Chrovats the names Servli, Zachlumi, Tervuniotae, Kanalitae, Diocletiani and Pagani are used by Constantine VII for Sclavenes in the same region.

because they are constantly plundered by Franks, Turks and Pechenegs.

Then Pechenegs had to attack Hungarians and Francs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pechenegs

Therefore White Croatia had to be northeastern in Poland and western Ukraine, in southwestern Ukraine there are about 50 forts that are linked with White Croats.

Also, apart from the name Chrovats the names Servli, Zachlumi, Tervuniotae, Kanalitae, Diocletiani and Pagani are used by Constantine VII for Sclavenes in the same region.

In White Croatia there are not any Servli, Zachlumi, Tervuniotae, Kanalitae, Diocletiani and Pagani...Today genetically people of this area come as Croats not as Servli, Zachlumi, Tervuniotae, Kanalitae, Diocletiani and Pagani..Croats have not come to Croatia as Tervuniotae but they are genetically same people, this logically suggests that they come as Croats who were later divided.

Tribe proconsul and patrician Michael, son of Višetinog, Archon of Zachlumi comes from unbaptized who lived on the river Vistula

Those who now live in Zahumlje, the Serbs from the time of that Archon who sought protection of Emperor Heraclius.


When is one Serb mentioned on the Vistula, Serbs according Porphyrogenetus coming from three directions on the Balkan and genetics does not confirm either one, that is because they came to Balkans as Croats who were later divided and become this or that.
 
White Croatia can't be in Northeastern Poland or Ukraine. It should be at least West of Vistula, near 'Francia'. If you read the text it will become obvious.
I am not interested in convincing you, really.
 
White Croatia can't be in Northeastern Poland or Ukraine. It should be at least West of Vistula, near 'Francia'. If you read the text it will become obvious.
I am not interested in convincing you, really.


Do you have genetic ...which Austria..

Ruins of White Croats were found in southwestern Ukraine, main Croatian haplotype I2a originate in southeastern Poland and extreme western Ukraine..

http://www.waughfamily.ca/Ancient/Tree and Map for Hg I.pdf

Stiljsko is a village in Lviv province (Mykolaiv district) near Lviv in Ukraine. The archaeological site in that location has great significance for research of history and life of White Croatians.

https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiljsko
 
Last edited:
White Croatia can't be in Northeastern Poland or Ukraine. It should be at least West of Vistula, near 'Francia'. If you read the text it will become obvious.
I am not interested in convincing you, really.
Wise decision. It is like religion to him.
 
Greetings Inya, I also come from Serbia and have, allow to say, fairly similar Y-test result as you did.

I came 100% probability R1a Y2395>Z284>L448.

Is it not personal question to ask of which geographical part of Serbia does your Y-tree line come from?

Also, does anyone have any more info on those L448 and Y2395?

Thank you in advance!
 
I don't understand where are you getting that data from. Can you provide some link or a quote?
One very credible study found 15% of R1a in Serbia, and R-M458 was 3.5%. It is "The phylogenetic and geographic structure of Y-chromosome haplogroup R1a": http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v23/n1/full/ejhg201450a.html

This table is from the mentioned study and contains results for different R1a branches. There you will see R-Z280 is significantly more frequent in Serbia compared to R-M458:

dmg28l.png
We Italians have similar percentage of R1a all over the country except from the Friuli.
 
hmm interesting results, maybe your family tree isnt correct, possible a russian grandfather?
 
You could be a direct descendant of the original Serbs who migrated from White Serbia to the Balkans. As for others, it seems like a sizable number of modern Serbs are descendants of assimilated local population who lived in the Balkans before the Slavic migrations during the Migration period.

Only myths, never proved. And Serbs have nothing with Sorbs. Sorbian language is similar to Polish, Kashubian and Czeck, it is not South Slavic language as Serbian.
 
It is about right, however exact location of White Serbia and likewise White Croatia is not known. There is also a thread in which we speculate if I2a Dinaric was part of Slavic expansion or not.
http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/26903-How-did-I2a-Din-get-to-the-Balkans
And this one by Tomenable: http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/31961-I2a1b2a1-(I-CTS10228)-a-strong-marker-of-Slavic-expansion
There is a thread by Tomenable in which we are trying to determine Slavic R1a clades.
http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30760-Slavic-R1a-clades

Yes, LeBrok. We see only speculations, nothing more. A lot of water will elapse Danube (many studies are needed) until we obtain a more accurate picture.
 
My source of information is this website (Ydna maps and R1a article) Also it seems that the dominant R1a subclade in Serbia is M458, although Z280 is also present.

No Inya, dominant R1a subclade at Croats is M458, but at Serbs is Z280.

You can see proportion mayor R1a subclades among Slavic population:

R1a_chart.png
 

This thread has been viewed 30681 times.

Back
Top