"Because the body and vagina of the mother is not equipped to give birth to the fetus of another race."I...
...
...what?
Updated to make it MORE clear for you...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Because the body and vagina of the mother is not equipped to give birth to the fetus of another race."I...
...
...what?
Well, maybe this photo will give you an understanding of what I am on about-I've simply never heard of the racial vaginal differences that would affect giving birth to a child of mixed origins. Increased risk of fetus rejection, etc., sure...
Why so curious? Why so many questions?I can't help but think that varying skull morphology of that type probably isn't a huge factor when birthing a child, due simply to the relative size involved. I would tend to think that the varying shapes within a population group are just as significant in the specific instance of passing through a birth canal, and doubtless accounted for by nature.
But I could be completely wrong, I suppose. Do you have any reference to this actually being an issue?
How could it not be obvious though? Put two and two together. Imagine a short, skinny Ectomorph East Asian female giving birth to a tall, robust Endomorphic Australoid male's child. You don't believe her tiny body would have problems with that?Ok. I don't believe that addresses the idea that women have difficulty birthing a child of mixed origin due to the natural form of either skull or vagina, though, which is what started our exchange.
It wasn't a thousand years old. It was written in Old Danish for the simple reason that both Norwegian and Danish anthropologists to read about it....and better understand...I'm not arguing against the deleterious effects you're speaking of.
I doubt that a thousand year-old book would be of much use.
How could it not be obvious though? Put two and two together. Imagine a short, skinny Ectomorph East Asian female giving birth to a tall, robust Endomorphic Australoid male's child. You don't believe her tiny body would have problems with that?
It wasn't a thousand years old. It was written in Old Danish for the simple reason that both Norwegian and Danish anthropologists to read about it....and better understand...
Miscegenation was also banned in the South until 1967-I'm not arguing against the deleterious effects you're speaking of.
I doubt that a thousand year-old book would be of much use.
This thread has been viewed 21559 times.