Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Three new species of giant mammals identified in Africa

  1. #1
    Satyavrata Maciamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    17-07-02
    Location
    Lothier
    Posts
    9,323


    Ethnic group
    Italo-celto-germanic
    Country: Belgium - Brussels



    1 members found this post helpful.

    Post Three new species of giant mammals identified in Africa

    I woke up this morning to the most shocking news, something that most people around the world didn't see coming. I am not talking about North Korea's nuclear test (we saw that one coming), but to a new German study published in Cell Biology showing that giraffes aren't a single species but four distinct species that hadn't mixed with each others for millions of years (in contrast Neanderthal split from Homo sapiens only 600,000 years ago).

    Those four species include:


    • southern giraffe (Giraffa giraffa),
    • Masai giraffe (G. tippelskirchi),
    • reticulated giraffe (G. reticulata)
    • northern giraffe (G. camelopardalis), which includes the Nubian giraffe (G. c. camelopardalis) as a distinct but related subspecies.


    Axel Janke, the lead author of the paper, explains that the genetic differences between the four species is as big as between polar bears and brown bears. That also means, I believe, that the genetic gap is about the same as the one between dogs, wolves, foxes and jackals. Yet we have clearly distinct words for these animals, and hundreds more of appellations for races of dogs. Does that mean that we should come up with new names for each giraffe species? Or should toddlers start at the very least to learn to recognise the patterns and say 'reticulated giraffe' and 'Masai giraffe' instead of just 'giraffe'? How will Japanese deal with the change, when their word for giraffe (kirin) was borrowed from a term for chemerical mythological beast that looks nothing like a giraffe, instead of having to import yet another new foreign word? That is bound to cause more confusion in the mind of school children who already had to share a word for giraffe with that of a horned and hooved dragon.

    That's a lot to think about before breakfast. I'll let it cool down a bit in my brain for the moment.
    My book selection---Follow me on Facebook and Twitter --- My profile on Academia.edu and on ResearchGate ----Check Wa-pedia's Japan Guide
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "What is the use of living, if it be not to strive for noble causes and to make this muddled world a better place for those who will live in it after we are gone?", Winston Churchill.

  2. #2
    Advisor bicicleur's Avatar
    Join Date
    27-01-13
    Location
    Zwevegem, Belgium
    Posts
    5,731


    Country: Belgium - Flanders



    Do all four species live exclusively in Africa?
    Do their territories overlap?

  3. #3
    Satyavrata Maciamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    17-07-02
    Location
    Lothier
    Posts
    9,323


    Ethnic group
    Italo-celto-germanic
    Country: Belgium - Brussels



    Quote Originally Posted by bicicleur View Post
    Do all four species live exclusively in Africa?
    Do their territories overlap?

    All giraffes live exclusively in Africa (if you exclude zoos, of course). Their territories do not overlap, except very slightly in Kenya for the Masai and reticulated giraffes.

    Before this study all sub-species were regarded as more or less equally distant from one another. This map from Wikipedia shows the old classification (the main article on giraffes has already been amended though).





    But it now transpires that many of these subspecies are actually variants of the so-called northern giraffe, or Nubian giraffe (G. camelopardalis). Far from being limited to the north, it includes western, central and southern sub-species too, like the West African giraffe (G. c. peralta), the Kordofan giraffe (G. c. antiquorum), the Rhodesian giraffe (G. c. thornicrofti) and the Angolan/Namibian giraffe (G. c. angolensis), in addition to the northern Rothschild's giraffe.

    This new Giraffa camelopardalis species appears to be the best adapted to a wide range of environments and the most adventurous.


    Note that the previous phylogenetic tree (pictured below), based on mitochondrial DNA only, had the classification of sub-species entirely wrong. This goes to show that mtDNA is not reliable and accurate enough to distinguish populations, as mtDNA distribution rarely reflects autosomal DNA variations. The yellow, orange and pink branches below represent the three new species that are clearly distinct from all other G. camelopardalis-derived subspecies.


  4. #4
    Regular Member Boreas's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-05-15
    Location
    Istanbul
    Posts
    708

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R-YP346
    MtDNA haplogroup
    J1b1b1

    Ethnic group
    Rumî
    Country: Turkey



    Quote Originally Posted by Maciamo View Post


    This map has been created in 2010, maybe that's why it is not shocking news. Some people have already known different type of giraffes like me

  5. #5
    Advisor bicicleur's Avatar
    Join Date
    27-01-13
    Location
    Zwevegem, Belgium
    Posts
    5,731


    Country: Belgium - Flanders



    I recall there was a tree based on mtDNA showing how Denisovans, Neanderthals and modern humans related to each other.
    Now they have autosomal DNA and the three looks quite different.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •