| Forum | Europe Travel Guide | Ecology | Facts & Trivia | Genetics | History | Linguistics |
| Austria | France | Germany | Ireland | Italy | Portugal | Spain | Switzerland |
 Eupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
|
Population Percent
1 Mediterranean 39.85
2 NE-Euro 29.33
3 Caucasian 14.78
4 SW-Asian 8.05
5 Baloch 3.61
6 W-African 1.63
7 E-African 1.29
8 Papuan 0.6
9 Pygmy 0.53
10 American 0.34
That's very weird results is in't ? Being 29.33 NE-Euro and 39.85 Mediterranean but no sign of Western Euro and French-German, are those made up?Originally Posted by DarknessC
New member, my results. Where would the Beringian and San come into play?
NE-Euro 49.34
Mediterranean 30.64
Caucasian 9.79
Baloch 8.17
SW-Asian 1.16
Beringian 0.48
San 0.42
Beringian and San are just noise, ignore it. You can check your results against Europeans in post 1.
Be wary of people who tend to glorify the past, underestimate the present, and demonize the future.
Beringian and San can come from minor Native American and Black African ancestry. Or they can be noise.
Based on Yang et al. 2011, White Americans are on average 98% European. Another study claimed 99%.
So minor Non-European admixtures such as minor Native and SSA are not so rare. Moreau et al. 2013 found out that average White Canadian is 2% Native American. But I know that this figure is higher for Acadians (this includes also Cajuns in the USA), who range from 2% to 30% Amerindian (average is probably about 10%). Acadians are concentrated in New Brunswick (30% of the population) and Nova Scotia (6%). Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maine, Quebec and Prince Edward Island also have Acadians (1% each).
There is also Acadian descent in France, and they could bring Amerindian admixture back to France:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_of_the_Acadians
French mixed with Amerindians more, because New France had a much smaller White population.
New France also had a deficit of White women, at least according to its first census of 1665/1666:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130517...es/jt1-eng.htm
You can't compare Europeans to Americans. As far as Americans are concerned, in certain states which had high percentages of slaves there were admixed slaves who "passed" when they got light enough. Pretty ironic when you consider southern racial attitudes, especially from the Civil War to the 50s of the 20th century. A lot of these people would have had no idea.
There's nothing comparable in Europe.
Non si fa il proprio dovere perchè qualcuno ci dica grazie, lo si fa per principio, per se stessi, per la propria dignità. Oriana Fallaci
Well, Europe never had so many African slaves. And lack of Amerindian in Europe is self-explanatory.
White Canadians have 0% of SSA admixture, unlike White Americans especially in the south. Easy to explain (no cotton plantations in Canada).
On the other hand, White Canadians - especially the ones of French extraction - tend to score some Amerindian. Also easy to explain, as French colonies always struggled to get immigrants from Europe and they had to rely on alliances with various tribes against the English and against other tribes.
Moreover, New France apparently was a little bit like New Spain in terms of proportions of male to female population, at least at the beginning.
At the time of English-French wars in the 1700s, white population in English colonies was at least 10 times that of whites in French colonies.
1 NE-Euro 55.33 2 Mediterranean 26.28 3 Caucasian 9.34 4 Baloch 7.3 5 American 1.36 6 SW-Asian 0.27 7 Papuan 0.11
Is it me or are these gedmatch calculators totally unreliable when it comes to measuring Neolithic ancestry? Here it's measured using the Mediterranean component. The Mycenaeans score low 30 in that yet they are well over twice that in terms of total Neolithic ancestry based on professional data. Is it based on Sardinians (in one thread I learned they themselves took on a lot of extra whg when they formed).
To me, the best calculator out there in terms of measuring how much European Neolithic farmer (or like) ancestry you have is the one Kurd released last year (with the west/east Euro, Levant and Iran farmer components). Nothing else out there accurately measures farmer components nearly as well imo.
mmmmmmmmm dooouuughhhnuuuutz
Definitely North East Europe, very close to Polish admixtures.
puntDNAL K10 Ancient Admixture Proportions:
WHG 44.36
ENF 32.21
CHG23.44
No "noise" on this one.
Finnall
Population S-Indian 1.38 Baloch 4.98 Caucasian 13.78 NE-Euro 29.43 SE-Asian 0.60 Siberian - NE-Asian 0.33 Papuan - American 0.44 Beringian - Mediterranean 39.89 SW-Asian 7.51 San - E-African - Pygmy 0.90 W-African 0.76
The closest match for you, I have in my database, is Portugal. Could be West Spanish, but I don't have Spain by regions.
Your paternal haplogroup could have something to do with Celts or Romans actually or some other emigrants to Iberia from these regions, but it's only 2 percent of your DNA.
https://www.eupedia.com/europe/maps_....shtml#R1b-S28
Last edited by LeBrok; 28-09-18 at 19:52.
Population
S-Indian -
Baloch 11.74
Caucasian 29.88
NE-Euro 22.94
SE-Asian -
Siberian 3.39
NE-Asian 1.17
Papuan 1.00
American -
Beringian 0.69
Mediterranean 19.24
SW-Asian 9.81
San -
E-African -
Pygmy -
W-African 0.07
LeBrok;
I'm waiting your considerate.
Thank you.
I think you are Bulgarian/Turkish mix.
I'm a Balkan Turk from Thessaloniki. Also i have a Albanian ancestry. Good analyze.
Thanks canadienne
Me:
NE-Euro 48.23
Mediterranean 31.37
Baloch 9.38
Caucasian 8.44
SW-Asian 1.21
S-Indian 0.61
Beringian 0.46
American 0.15
Pygmy 0.14
My mom:
NE-Euro 47.37
Mediterranean 29.39
Caucasian 10.57
Baloch 8.86
SW-Asian 1.12
NE-Asian 0.75
S-Indian 0.68
American 0.45
San 0.43
Pygmy 0.22
Beringian 0.17
My husband:
NE-Euro 45.16
Mediterranean 30.01
Caucasian 10.37
Baloch 7.63
W-African 3.46
Papuan 1.05
E-African 0.88
American 0.61
SW-Asian 0.44
Pygmy 0.30
San 0.07
My mom is quite noisy lol, a little noisier than me. My husband not so much. His noise is legit ancestry within the past 10 generations.
Population S-Indian 4.95 Baloch 26.27 Caucasian 34.29 NE-Euro 4.06 SE-Asian 1.71 Siberian 2.64 NE-Asian 4.56 Papuan 0.35 American 0.38 Beringian 0.95 Mediterranean 5.51 SW-Asian 12.37 San 0.58 E-African 0.27 Pygmy 0.41 W-African 0.69
Me-
1NE-Euro 45.04
2Mediterranean 31.78
3Caucasian 12.05
4Baloch 9.24
5American 0.98
6Siberian 0.32
7NE-Asian 0.26
8Beringian 0.17
9SW-Asian 0.15
Closest population match-French
My Harappa world results:
N.E. European - 51.42
Mediterranean - 30.29
Baloch - 9.73
Caucasian - 7.68
You can check tables on page one to find out how you fit in the world.
My harappa results
Population
S-Indian -
Baloch 9.98
Caucasian 6.72
NE-Euro 47.65
SE-Asian -
Siberian -
NE-Asian -
Papuan -
American -
Beringian 0.40
Mediterranean 32.55
SW-Asian 2.57
San -
E-African 0.09
Pygmy -
W-African -
Everything but elevated level of SW Asian is typically English. I think, 3-4 generations back you had an ancestors from South Europe. Or 5-6 generations ago from Near East or North Africa.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote