MOESAN
Elite member
- Messages
- 5,888
- Reaction score
- 1,294
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Brittany
- Ethnic group
- more celtic
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1b - L21/S145*
- mtDNA haplogroup
- H3c
We can make a balance of all that?
No Slavs as others are not racially homogenous pops - but a pop doesn' t need to be homozygotous in all its genes (what doesn't exist in nature, even among well separated races of animals) to be homogenous in a geographic sense, it's to say as opposed to others pops in a well defined territory and cultural area -
Saying a pop is homogenous (at least for a time) somewhere is saying its diverse components are represented in the same %'s allover the territory considered (homogeneisation or levelling of mixtures) -
what i think I understood is that southern Slavs are the farthest from the supposed (by me too) cradle around E-Poland/Belarus/NW Ukraina - This doesn't prove the culture and language have been transmitted uniquely through contacts acculturation, but that the tail (rather the head in fact) of the Slavic colonisers had incorporated more and more non-Slavic people as they were moving on towards South, until the place they were no more dense enough to pass their culture on*. Nothing more, nothing less IMO.
modern pops are mixed all of them, but we can see differences in the mean of their admixtures and everytime we look at the likely heart of their culturally genesis region we see a pop more differentiated from other cultures means than the lastly colonised peripheric regions, the most of the time.
Very often a new culture is born bt the mix of different cultures but it arose perceptively only after homogeneisation
No Slavs as others are not racially homogenous pops - but a pop doesn' t need to be homozygotous in all its genes (what doesn't exist in nature, even among well separated races of animals) to be homogenous in a geographic sense, it's to say as opposed to others pops in a well defined territory and cultural area -
Saying a pop is homogenous (at least for a time) somewhere is saying its diverse components are represented in the same %'s allover the territory considered (homogeneisation or levelling of mixtures) -
what i think I understood is that southern Slavs are the farthest from the supposed (by me too) cradle around E-Poland/Belarus/NW Ukraina - This doesn't prove the culture and language have been transmitted uniquely through contacts acculturation, but that the tail (rather the head in fact) of the Slavic colonisers had incorporated more and more non-Slavic people as they were moving on towards South, until the place they were no more dense enough to pass their culture on*. Nothing more, nothing less IMO.
modern pops are mixed all of them, but we can see differences in the mean of their admixtures and everytime we look at the likely heart of their culturally genesis region we see a pop more differentiated from other cultures means than the lastly colonised peripheric regions, the most of the time.
Very often a new culture is born bt the mix of different cultures but it arose perceptively only after homogeneisation