Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34

Thread: What's your opinion on this blog post on inbreeding in Europeans?

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    25-11-16
    Posts
    13


    Country: USA - Idaho



    1 members found this post helpful.

    What's your opinion on this blog post on inbreeding in Europeans?

    jaymans.wordpress.com/2013/09/07/how-inbred-are-europeans/

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    06-11-16
    Posts
    182


    Ethnic group
    Neapolitan, Swiss, Slavic
    Country: Hungary



    Near Eastern/Mediterranean cultures are often "clannish" in terms of mentality. People get used to select partners from other families and usually with those whom they've been living side by side so long. First cousin marriages have a tradition in those regions, while Christianity considered cousin marriages as a sin, people in the non Christian regions viewed cousin marriages as a cultural strengthen of the community because they're not only in a relationship but show close genetic relatedness the same time.
    European societies are more individualistic and the younger generation have a tradition to leave parents to look for a new home and to look for a new partner to settle down with.
    It's still a common tradition in India, ME regions the parents select the wife for the child way before he would try to attempt seeking a partner for himself.

  3. #3
    MarkoZ
    Guest


    3 members found this post helpful.
    So his hypothesis is that Northern Europeans are less 'clannish' because of climate, high IQ, Protestantism and the feudal system. This is human pattern recognition gone haywire.

    This is exactly why I usually don't read blogs.

  4. #4
    Advisor Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    19,236


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York



    1 members found this post helpful.
    What do I think of it? I think he'd better find another interest, one more suited to his IQ and the depth of his knowledge of genetics, history, and human cultures, maybe like basket weaving.


    Non si fa il proprio dovere perchè qualcuno ci dica grazie, lo si fa per principio, per se stessi, per la propria dignità. Oriana Fallaci

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    06-11-16
    Posts
    182


    Ethnic group
    Neapolitan, Swiss, Slavic
    Country: Hungary



    Continental Europe due to its geography and more "general European" cultural values viewed relationships between close family members as a sin, so religion and culture is a possibility to explain the close genetic relatedness between Mediterranean individuals.
    For example the average Polish person will likely have way more distant cousins from even Norway or Western Europe because significant migrations happened since the middle ages, where as the Southern parts of Europe likely stayed more isolated and kept their more clannish, Mediterranean values.



    Notice the difference between Collectivist VS Individualist societies and see how the rates of genetic homogeneity decreases:

    Notice Hungary is technically the melting plot of Europe, we've been able to allow various migrations and the region been colonized by various ethnic groups from Germanic to Turkic tribes which gave the opportunity to make a genetically heterogeneous population.



  6. #6
    Advisor Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    19,236


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York



    I don't expect that every poster will have spent decades studying European history and cultural developments, but a five minute google search shouldn't be too difficult.

    There is some variation in the studies done on consanguinity in Europe, but none of them support your position.

    Are England and Germany part of southern Europe now?


    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gn...colorsmall.jpg

    In this one Norway and Sweden seem to have the same rate as Italy.


    https://static-content.springer.com/...OESM2_ESM.jpeg

    Even the map by the "blogger" whose opinions you seem to admire doesn't support what you are saying. In case you have difficulty understanding the map, Poles and other eastern Europeans are much more inbred than southern Europeans.

    https://jaymans.files.wordpress.com/...t-europe-d.png

    A few other tidbits that you might have missed:

    Consanguineous marriages in Europe in the past often tracked very well with wealth and social class. Royalty practiced it the most, then aristocrats, then the upper middle class, like the family of Charles Darwin ironically enough, for example. It was all about the protection of wealth. We all know how that turned out.

    Also, in Europe, consanguinity tracks with isolation. You just don't have much damn choice when you're perched on some mountain peak with mule tracks being the only way in and out. In fact, that applies to the New World to some extent too, although they normally were able to spread out. Perhaps, not being American, you're unaware that the most inbred groups in America are the people of the Appalachians and the Mormons, both representatives of the "purest" Northwest European ancestry.

    Islands are another biggie. That's why both Sardinia and Ireland have high rates of genetic, hereditary disease.

    Other than geography, religious/cultural practices can also have an effect. In fact, it has been suggested that Islam, which so severely limits access to women who aren't members of your family, is one of the causes of consanguineous marriages in the Near East.

    Then, of course, there's the effect of what is, in my opinion, the racism enshrined in the Indian caste system.

    Obviously, a lot of factors are at play, just not the ones you would prefer to cite.

    Now, I'm done with this topic. There's a limit to how much time I'm willing to waste explaining the obvious.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    17-03-16
    Posts
    536


    Country: Greece



    In modern Greece, first cousin marriages are illegal. "Article 1357 of the Greek Civil Code prohibits the marriage of relatives of direct blood line in totality, and up the four degrees of consanguinity of the secondary blood line. Article 1358 of the Greek Civil Code also prohibits the marriage of relatives in law totally in direct blood line, and up the third degree of the secondary blood line.

    Compare that law to the laws in Netherlands where almost everything is allowed. Germany isn't that 'liberal' but still first cousins can marry as far as I understand. I think most of Europe is like Germany.

    In US they are legal in Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Virginia, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, N. Carolina, S. Carolina, Florida, Hawaii .

    Btw, an example from Christians from Africa (from Wikipedia)
    Among the Christian Habesha highlanders of Ethiopia and Eritrea (the predominantly orthodox Christian Amhara and Tigray-Tigrinya), it is a tradition to be able to recount one's paternal ancestors at least seven generations away starting from early childhood, because "those with a common patrilineal ancestor less than seven generations away are considered 'brother and sister' and may not marry."

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    17-03-16
    Posts
    536


    Country: Greece



    1 members found this post helpful.
    Also, that man probably believes that NW Europeans are a different species, much more evolved than the rest who practiced first cousin marriages, supposedly. He should be hospitalized.

  9. #9
    Advisor bicicleur's Avatar
    Join Date
    27-01-13
    Location
    Zwevegem, Belgium
    Posts
    5,730


    Country: Belgium - Flanders



    Quote Originally Posted by A. Papadimitriou View Post

    Compare that law to the laws in Netherlands where almost everything is allowed. Germany isn't that 'liberal' but still first cousins can marry as far as I understand. I think most of Europe is like Germany.
    where did you get that?
    can you show me the law?

  10. #10
    Advisor Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    19,236


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York



    I hope Papadimitriou doesn't mind, but I came across this when I wrote my prior post on this thread.

    See:
    https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/360761

    "According to the Dutch Civil Law, marriages betweenfirst cousins are allowed; Catholics, however, need dispensationfrom their church for such unions. Under DutchCivil Law, uncle-niece and aunt-nephew marriages arenot allowed, but dispensation by a Royal Decree can begiven."

    I don't know if a ban has since gone into effect.

    Otherwise, the story is the same for the Netherlands as it was for most of Europe in that consanguineous marriages declined starting in the 19th century. The earlier that a country industrialized and created efficient methods of modern transportation, leading to increased mobility, the earlier the decline began.

    Another interesting fact is that consanguineous marriages are usually slightly more prevalent among Protestants than among Catholics, because Catholics require dispensations. Lutheranism got rid of those requirements.

    "They were more frequent in 3 out of 6 socialclasses, and more prevalent among orthodox Protestantsin the so-called Bible Belt area, stretching from the SouthWesternprovince of Zeeland to the North-Western partof the province of Overijssel. The 6 distinguished socialclasses were: (1) higher managers and professionals; (2)lower managers and professionals; (3) farmers and fishermen;(4) lower skilled workers; (5) unskilled workers, and(6) farm workers. Classes 1, 2 and 3 were overrepresentedamong the consanguineous couples. Bras et al. [11] arguedthat for these social classes cousin marriages servedboth an economic and a political purpose."

    "There are a number of communities in the Netherlands,in which certain autosomal recessive disordersand parental consanguinity or at least endogamy aremore prevalent. One-time islands in the former Zuiderzeeand fishing towns, such as the ones around it, arefamiliar examples."

  11. #11
    Advisor LeBrok's Avatar
    Join Date
    18-11-09
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,295

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b Z2109
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H1c

    Ethnic group
    Citizen of the world
    Country: Canada-Alberta



    Quote Originally Posted by Angela View Post

    Otherwise, the story is the same for the Netherlands as it was for most of Europe in that consanguineous marriages declined starting in the 19th century. The earlier that a country industrialized and created efficient methods of modern transportation, leading to increased mobility, the earlier the decline began.
    Exactly. Before that time all villages in Europe looked like populations of cousins. Not much different than what we still see in Middle East and other places around the globe. Modern world definitely made population very mobile and better mixed.
    Be wary of people who tend to glorify the past, underestimate the present, and demonize the future.

  12. #12
    Advisor bicicleur's Avatar
    Join Date
    27-01-13
    Location
    Zwevegem, Belgium
    Posts
    5,730


    Country: Belgium - Flanders



    Quote Originally Posted by Angela View Post
    I hope Papadimitriou doesn't mind, but I came across this when I wrote my prior post on this thread.

    See:
    https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/360761

    "According to the Dutch Civil Law, marriages betweenfirst cousins are allowed; Catholics, however, need dispensationfrom their church for such unions. Under DutchCivil Law, uncle-niece and aunt-nephew marriages arenot allowed, but dispensation by a Royal Decree can begiven."

    I don't know if a ban has since gone into effect.

    Otherwise, the story is the same for the Netherlands as it was for most of Europe in that consanguineous marriages declined starting in the 19th century. The earlier that a country industrialized and created efficient methods of modern transportation, leading to increased mobility, the earlier the decline began.

    Another interesting fact is that consanguineous marriages are usually slightly more prevalent among Protestants than among Catholics, because Catholics require dispensations. Lutheranism got rid of those requirements.

    "They were more frequent in 3 out of 6 socialclasses, and more prevalent among orthodox Protestantsin the so-called Bible Belt area, stretching from the SouthWesternprovince of Zeeland to the North-Western partof the province of Overijssel. The 6 distinguished socialclasses were: (1) higher managers and professionals; (2)lower managers and professionals; (3) farmers and fishermen;(4) lower skilled workers; (5) unskilled workers, and(6) farm workers. Classes 1, 2 and 3 were overrepresentedamong the consanguineous couples. Bras et al. [11] arguedthat for these social classes cousin marriages servedboth an economic and a political purpose."

    "There are a number of communities in the Netherlands,in which certain autosomal recessive disordersand parental consanguinity or at least endogamy aremore prevalent. One-time islands in the former Zuiderzeeand fishing towns, such as the ones around it, arefamiliar examples."

    they are refering to Urk, a once isolated fishing community on an island in the Zuiderzee, which today isn't an island any more
    it is the only example I know of

    I'm pretty sure consanguinity in the Netherlands is not higher than in Greece or Italy

    As you point out, even if their were no laws against it, the community didn't allow cousins to marry. It was not done, and still is not done.
    But marriage was still mostly within the same village because of limited contacts, at least for the lower classes.

    I know however many Marrocan immigrants living in Belgium go back 'to their family' during summer holidays.
    The whole village where they originate from is 'their family' and it is also there where many get their brides.
    I don't know what their customs are over there.

    I read in the study you mention:

    'The public opinion at present is opposed to consanguineousmarriages, since it has long been generally feltthat consanguinity of the parents is a threat to the healthof the children. A ban on consanguineous marriages is beingprepared by the present government in an attempt tofight forced marriages.'

    So, there was no need for a law before, but these 'forced marriages' are something new, it is about arranged marriages between immigrants, either among immigrated families or getting the bride from their 'home villages'.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    17-03-16
    Posts
    536


    Country: Greece



    Quote Originally Posted by bicicleur View Post
    where did you get that?
    can you show me the law?
    I wasn't clear. I meant that apart from first cousin marriages which are legal in most of Europe, they also don't have any laws against incest between 'consenting adults'. Correct me if I'm wrong. Most European countries have laws againist that, sometimes not for half-siblings (Finland, Denmark, Sweden for example) though (as if that isn't incest).

    That's that probably it (they prohibit marriage between siblings, between parents and children but exceptions are possible theoretically if understand it correctly.)
    1 Een huwelijk mag niet worden gesloten tussen hen die elkander, hetzij van nature hetzij familierechtelijk, bestaan in de opgaande en in de nederdalende lijn of als broeders, zusters of broeder en zuster.
    2 Onze Minister van Justitie kan om gewichtige redenen ontheffing van het verbod verlenen aan hen die broeders, zusters of broeder en zuster door adoptie zijn.
    http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR000265...ing1_Artikel41

    I understand, though, that incest laws aren't really enforceable, but banning first cousin marriages is and most (?) European countries have chosen not to do it.

  14. #14
    Advisor Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    19,236


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York



    Quote Originally Posted by bicicleur View Post
    they are refering to Urk, a once isolated fishing community on an island in the Zuiderzee, which today isn't an island any more
    it is the only example I know of

    I'm pretty sure consanguinity in the Netherlands is not higher than in Greece or Italy

    As you point out, even if their were no laws against it, the community didn't allow cousins to marry. It was not done, and still is not done.
    But marriage was still mostly within the same village because of limited contacts, at least for the lower classes.

    I know however many Marrocan immigrants living in Belgium go back 'to their family' during summer holidays.
    The whole village where they originate from is 'their family' and it is also there where many get their brides.
    I don't know what their customs are over there.

    I read in the study you mention:

    'The public opinion at present is opposed to consanguineousmarriages, since it has long been generally feltthat consanguinity of the parents is a threat to the healthof the children. A ban on consanguineous marriages is beingprepared by the present government in an attempt tofight forced marriages.'

    So, there was no need for a law before, but these 'forced marriages' are something new, it is about arranged marriages between immigrants, either among immigrated families or getting the bride from their 'home villages'.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage

  15. #15
    Advisor Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    19,236


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York



    Quote Originally Posted by bicicleur View Post
    they are refering to Urk, a once isolated fishing community on an island in the Zuiderzee, which today isn't an island any more
    it is the only example I know of

    I'm pretty sure consanguinity in the Netherlands is not higher than in Greece or Italy

    As you point out, even if their were no laws against it, the community didn't allow cousins to marry. It was not done, and still is not done.
    But marriage was still mostly within the same village because of limited contacts, at least for the lower classes.

    I know however many Marrocan immigrants living in Belgium go back 'to their family' during summer holidays.
    The whole village where they originate from is 'their family' and it is also there where many get their brides.
    I don't know what their customs are over there.

    I read in the study you mention:

    'The public opinion at present is opposed to consanguineousmarriages, since it has long been generally feltthat consanguinity of the parents is a threat to the healthof the children. A ban on consanguineous marriages is beingprepared by the present government in an attempt tofight forced marriages.'

    So, there was no need for a law before, but these 'forced marriages' are something new, it is about arranged marriages between immigrants, either among immigrated families or getting the bride from their 'home villages'.
    As you can see from the maps above, different studies show slightly varying percentages by country in Europe, probably mostly because of different definitions of consanguinity. Some would look only at first cousin marriages, some would include second cousins, or even third cousins, although I think by the time you're talking about the inbreeding coefficient of third cousins you're no longer talking about appreciable risk so long as the group you're looking at hasn't been inbreeding for generations already. In that case, third cousins might actually be closer to "real" first cousins.

    The fact is that first cousin marriage is pretty rare in most of Europe today. That wasn't always the case, however. It differed in the past based on when a country became industrialized and when modern transportation, leading to increased mobility, came about. As Le Brok pointed out, many people in Europe, rural people in particular, were marrying within villages of cousins until that new era.

    I don't know how much of a difference it made in those days before the industrial revolution that Protestants were able, since the Reformation, to freely practice first cousin marriage, given the fact that dispensations were indeed given in Catholic countries. It's been studied in Italy back hundreds of years in some areas, but I don't know if similar studies were done in Protestant countries, so I don't know what a comparison would show. I don't think there would be a huge difference.

    It's an interesting fact of history that it did linger on as a practice even into the 19th century in industrialized countries among "propertied" people for, as the article points out, reasons of economics and politics. In addition to Charles Darwin, all of the following married first and second cousins: H.G.Wells, Thomas Jefferson, Edgar Allan Poe, Einstein, Bach, etc. Royalty and nobility are notoriously inbred.

    There's no comparison between modern rates for Europeans, where first cousin marriage in most places hovers around 1%, and those for immigrants foitrom Turkey or Morocco or India, where you're talking about 20, 30 and 40% rates, usually, interestingly enough all in the paternal line, which is very different from Italy, where, at least in my area, it was through the maternal line. In other words, mothers in our area handled the matchmaking, arranging marriages for their children with members of her family and friendship networks. Still, for whatever reason, the risks were known to most people, so the degree was important. My nonna's list of "don'ts" in terms of marriage always included a warning about first, second, and even third cousin marriage. It was unnecessary, given I had imbued modern attitudes toward it, no matter how handsome they were, and how well we got along, but I can see how it was indeed necessary in the world of her youth, where these were the people among whom you spent your life, and choices were much more limited. They were smart about this in my father's villages, given that the breeding pool had been so small for so many generations.

    In terms of the actual effect on fitness:

    "In April 2002, the Journal of Genetic Counseling released a report which estimated the average risk of birth defects in a child born of first cousins at 1.1–2.0 percentage points over an average base risk for non-cousin couples of 3%, or about the same as that of any woman over age 40.[187] In terms of mortality, a 1994 study found a mean excess pre-reproductive mortality rate of 4.4%,[188] while another study published in 2009 suggests the rate may be closer to 3.5%.[7]Put differently, first-cousin marriage entails a similar increased risk of birth defects and mortality as a woman faces when she gives birth at age 41 rather than at 30.[189] Critics argue that banning first-cousin marriages would make as much sense as trying to ban childbearing by older women.Repeated consanginous marriages within a group are more problematic. After repeated generations of cousin marriage the actual genetic relationship between two people is closer than the most immediate relationship would suggest. In Pakistan, where there has been cousin marriage for generations and the current rate may exceed 50%, one study estimated infant mortality at 12.7 percent for married double first cousins, 7.9 percent for first cousins, 9.2 percent for first cousins once removed/double second cousins, 6.9 percent for second cousins, and 5.1 percent among nonconsanguineous progeny. Among double first cousin progeny, 41.2 percent of prereproductive deaths were associated with the expression of detrimental recessive genes, with equivalent values of 26.0, 14.9, and 8.1 percent for first cousins, first cousins once removed/double second cousins, and second cousins respectively.[190]"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage

    A general thing that also has to be kept in mind is that a lot depends on the mutations floating around in the "breeding pool". In other words, how many deleterious mutations did the "founding" members carry, and how many occurred in the centuries of isolation. It differs by group. Some isolated communities show a lot of genetic disease, others almost none, as Cavalli Sforza found in the Parma Valley, thank goodness.


  16. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    01-05-16
    Posts
    7


    Country: Slovakia



    from what I remembered the Catholic church doesn't allow marraiges usually under third cousins, and at least in Slovakia priests would keep matricula books(as in outher countries) specifically to make sure people were not related when they got married.

  17. #17
    Elite member
    Join Date
    23-02-15
    Location
    Groningen
    Posts
    1,149

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    E1b1b/ E-V22

    Ethnic group
    North Sea Germanic
    Country: Netherlands



    Quote Originally Posted by Angela View Post
    As you can see from the maps above, different studies show slightly varying percentages by country in Europe, probably mostly because of different definitions of consanguinity. Some would look only at first cousin marriages, some would include second cousins, or even third cousins, although I think by the time you're talking about the inbreeding coefficient of third cousins you're no longer talking about appreciable risk so long as the group you're looking at hasn't been inbreeding for generations already. In that case, third cousins might actually be closer to "real" first cousins.

    The fact is that first cousin marriage is pretty rare in most of Europe today. That wasn't always the case, however. It differed in the past based on when a country became industrialized and when modern transportation, leading to increased mobility, came about. As Le Brok pointed out, many people in Europe, rural people in particular, were marrying within villages of cousins until that new era.

    I don't know how much of a difference it made in those days before the industrial revolution that Protestants were able, since the Reformation, to freely practice first cousin marriage, given the fact that dispensations were indeed given in Catholic countries. It's been studied in Italy back hundreds of years in some areas, but I don't know if similar studies were done in Protestant countries, so I don't know what a comparison would show. I don't think there would be a huge difference.

    It's an interesting fact of history that it did linger on as a practice even into the 19th century in industrialized countries among "propertied" people for, as the article points out, reasons of economics and politics. In addition to Charles Darwin, all of the following married first and second cousins: H.G.Wells, Thomas Jefferson, Edgar Allan Poe, Einstein, Bach, etc. Royalty and nobility are notoriously inbred.

    There's no comparison between modern rates for Europeans, where first cousin marriage in most places hovers around 1%, and those for immigrants foitrom Turkey or Morocco or India, where you're talking about 20, 30 and 40% rates, usually, interestingly enough all in the paternal line, which is very different from Italy, where, at least in my area, it was through the maternal line. In other words, mothers in our area handled the matchmaking, arranging marriages for their children with members of her family and friendship networks. Still, for whatever reason, the risks were known to most people, so the degree was important. My nonna's list of "don'ts" in terms of marriage always included a warning about first, second, and even third cousin marriage. It was unnecessary, given I had imbued modern attitudes toward it, no matter how handsome they were, and how well we got along, but I can see how it was indeed necessary in the world of her youth, where these were the people among whom you spent your life, and choices were much more limited. They were smart about this in my father's villages, given that the breeding pool had been so small for so many generations.

    In terms of the actual effect on fitness:

    "In April 2002, the Journal of Genetic Counseling released a report which estimated the average risk of birth defects in a child born of first cousins at 1.1–2.0 percentage points over an average base risk for non-cousin couples of 3%, or about the same as that of any woman over age 40.[187] In terms of mortality, a 1994 study found a mean excess pre-reproductive mortality rate of 4.4%,[188] while another study published in 2009 suggests the rate may be closer to 3.5%.[7]Put differently, first-cousin marriage entails a similar increased risk of birth defects and mortality as a woman faces when she gives birth at age 41 rather than at 30.[189] Critics argue that banning first-cousin marriages would make as much sense as trying to ban childbearing by older women.Repeated consanginous marriages within a group are more problematic. After repeated generations of cousin marriage the actual genetic relationship between two people is closer than the most immediate relationship would suggest. In Pakistan, where there has been cousin marriage for generations and the current rate may exceed 50%, one study estimated infant mortality at 12.7 percent for married double first cousins, 7.9 percent for first cousins, 9.2 percent for first cousins once removed/double second cousins, 6.9 percent for second cousins, and 5.1 percent among nonconsanguineous progeny. Among double first cousin progeny, 41.2 percent of prereproductive deaths were associated with the expression of detrimental recessive genes, with equivalent values of 26.0, 14.9, and 8.1 percent for first cousins, first cousins once removed/double second cousins, and second cousins respectively.[190]"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage

    A general thing that also has to be kept in mind is that a lot depends on the mutations floating around in the "breeding pool". In other words, how many deleterious mutations did the "founding" members carry, and how many occurred in the centuries of isolation. It differs by group. Some isolated communities show a lot of genetic disease, others almost none, as Cavalli Sforza found in the Parma Valley, thank goodness.

    Interesting topic. Did a little survey. First of all I think this has something to do with individualism vs collectivism and hierarchy vs egalitarian society. I suppose that in societies where is less individualism combined with unequal relationships between man and woman the chances of (arranged) inbred are higher. In Europe this is pretty differentiated, given the old patterns of how families are constructed. Drawn from the French anthropologist Emannuel Todd the "family ties" are as follows in Europe:


    https://hbdchick.files.wordpress.com...e-frisians.jpg


    Within this system the absolute nuclear family system is the most individualistic and egalitarian. This is very typical voor the North Sea region in Europe. From at least the early middle ages this is the area of the "free farmer" the land of the churl (anglo saxon) or Kerl (german). This is also the area of the early commerce. This free minded, capitalistic spirit (avant la lettre) went (in exaggerated form) to New Amsterdam and further....(in front of your nose Angela!).


    Even till to day most people from more central Europe (Belgium, France, Germany) find it striking how families from the North Sea coast are characterized by their individualistic and equal way of behavior between man and woman and especially the relationship between parents and children (from a more authoritarian point of view especially Dutch children are very liberated and big mouthed).

    Regarding to inbred I assume (as said) that this is in individualistic and more equal societies less the case than in more communal and hierarchical. Forced marriages and inbreed are I assume close to each other. They combine less with an individualistic and equal spirit. As far as I know this was and is in Northwestern Europe a big tabu. Even forbidden. The only thing which in some sense stimulated endogamie, and this is very remarkable, a modern differentiation in these societies along social economic status and religious lines. It was sometimes difficult in the (early) modern period to find someone from your own social economic class and religion in your own neighborhood. But this as a different background because 'classical' inbred is more characteristic of area's with less differentiation and so fort.

    So Angela when you must pinpoint inbred in Europe the chances are (or were?) higher in the mountains of let's say Sicily or Albania than along the marshes North Sea coast.
    Last edited by Northener; 01-01-17 at 18:01.

  18. #18
    Advisor LeBrok's Avatar
    Join Date
    18-11-09
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,295

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b Z2109
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H1c

    Ethnic group
    Citizen of the world
    Country: Canada-Alberta



    1 members found this post helpful.
    Quote Originally Posted by Northener View Post
    Within this system the absolute nuclear family system is the most individualistic and egalitarian. This is very typical voor the North Sea region in Europe. From at least the early middle ages this is the area of the "free farmer" the land of the churl (anglo saxon) or Kerl (german). This is also the area of the early commerce. This free minded, capitalistic spirit (avant la lettre) went (in exaggerated form) to New Amsterdam and further....(in front of your nose Angela!).
    It is not that simple to present it as a case between individualism and collectivism. It was 15th century Italy after all, where modern capital market and banking was invented. It is Northern Europe, where societies are more united in ideologies and direction, and South more divided, with thousands of small political parties, with everybody having own opinion on everything, and voiced loudly.
    People in North care less how they dress, people in south are more flashy to stand out.
    In WW2, German army was very coherent and sacrificial, Italian army not even close, they quit and went home.

  19. #19
    Elite member
    Join Date
    23-02-15
    Location
    Groningen
    Posts
    1,149

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    E1b1b/ E-V22

    Ethnic group
    North Sea Germanic
    Country: Netherlands



    Quote Originally Posted by LeBrok View Post
    It is not that simple to present it as a case between individualism and collectivism. It was 15th century Italy after all, where modern capital market and banking was invented. It is Northern Europe, where societies are more united in ideologies and direction, and South more divided, with thousands of small political parties, with everybody having own opinion on everything, and voiced loudly.
    People in North care less how they dress, people in south are more flashy to stand out.
    In WW2, German army was very coherent and sacrificial, Italian army not even close, they quit and went home.
    No it's not that simple, but related to inbreeding, forced marriages etc this is pretty convincing at least according to me:
    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/...pes-come-from/

    and
    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/...de-lideologie/

  20. #20
    MarkoZ
    Guest


    1 members found this post helpful.
    Quote Originally Posted by Northener View Post
    No it's not that simple, but related to inbreeding, forced marriages etc this is pretty convincing at least according to me:
    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/...pes-come-from/

    and
    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/...de-lideologie/
    Even on the first glance I noticed some glaring errors. For example, she included South Slavs who have unique kinship terms for cousins up to the 11th degree due to their strong taboo on inbreeding among the populations prone to counsin marriage.

    There's also the weird association between family patterns and ideology. To illustrate my point, which do you deem more likely: 1. that communism spread in Eastern Europe due to cousin marriage and family structure or 2. that communism spread as far as the Red Army's tanks went.

    In the same vein the expansion of Islam matches far more accurately the extent of the Umayyad Caliphate than the rather arbitrary model of the 'endogamous community family'.

  21. #21
    Elite member
    Join Date
    23-02-15
    Location
    Groningen
    Posts
    1,149

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    E1b1b/ E-V22

    Ethnic group
    North Sea Germanic
    Country: Netherlands



    It's obvious that the family structures survived the red tanks......


    Sent from my iPad using Eupedia Forum

  22. #22
    Regular Member Templar's Avatar
    Join Date
    23-10-11
    Posts
    590

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    G-L42
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H2a1

    Ethnic group
    Paleolithic European
    Country: Bosnia & Herzegovina



    I believe that he didn't use any data to make that map. It seems as if he created it based on stereotypes and liberal guesswork.

  23. #23
    Elite member
    Join Date
    23-02-15
    Location
    Groningen
    Posts
    1,149

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    E1b1b/ E-V22

    Ethnic group
    North Sea Germanic
    Country: Netherlands



    What's your opinion on this blog post on inbreeding in Europeans?

    Quote Originally Posted by Templar View Post
    I believe that he didn't use any data to make that map. It seems as if he created it based on stereotypes and liberal guesswork.
    It doesn't look as classical Marxism to me either Marxism turned upside down
    I don't know which data the anthropologist has used, but what I do know that for the situation along the the Northsea it's pretty accurate. This was undoubtedly the area of the free farmer, with his own territory, and with less or no obligation to some kind of nobleman. That's indeed different from the most of Europe (in the past). So be it. And you can look all the way down to Beowulf to see some (embryonic) individualism in it....
    And individualism and some equal position between man and woman are giant forces against forced marriages and inbreeding! No Le Brok this doesn't rule out that this has taken place, the reality is always with more paradoxes and is always messy. But I think the gross picture looks clear.


    Sent from my iPad using Eupedia Forum

  24. #24
    Advisor bicicleur's Avatar
    Join Date
    27-01-13
    Location
    Zwevegem, Belgium
    Posts
    5,730


    Country: Belgium - Flanders



    Quote Originally Posted by Seanp View Post

    Notice Hungary is technically the melting plot of Europe, we've been able to allow various migrations and the region been colonized by various ethnic groups from Germanic to Turkic tribes which gave the opportunity to make a genetically heterogeneous population.
    what do you mean by 'being able to allow' ?

  25. #25
    Advisor LeBrok's Avatar
    Join Date
    18-11-09
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,295

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b Z2109
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H1c

    Ethnic group
    Citizen of the world
    Country: Canada-Alberta



    Quote Originally Posted by Northener View Post
    No it's not that simple, but related to inbreeding, forced marriages etc this is pretty convincing at least according to me:
    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/...pes-come-from/

    and
    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/...de-lideologie/
    Here is another good example. People in north are more bylaw obeying. For example in north people will wait for a green light to cross the road. People in south treat red light more like a suggestion. Same goes for all traffic regulations. How does this go with individualism vs collectivism?
    Here is one more. People in north will lie more often not to hurt someone's feelings, about their cooking, how others dress or behave, and generally are more politically correct. I'm not sure if it denotes more tolerance or compassion, or obedience, but definitely helps a collective life of a group by avoiding confrontation. People in south are more direct with their opinion. Again, I'm not sure if it is due to being more emotional, or contrarian, more egoistic, strong willed, but surely it is more individualistic.

    Also, statistically speaking, people in north tend to share more with others, either by obediently paying taxes or giving freely to charities. People in south tend to share less with strangers but are more generous to immediate family. Which one, you might think, is more collective? My pet hypothesis is that this is hunter-gatherer vs farmer issue, expressed through natural selection.
    South is more farmer like, farmers have private fields which benefit family first. If they have more then they share with a village. If father and mother die, kids usually die too (in the past). Hunters-gatherers live in multifamily groups, they all hunt and gather together, then they share and eat together. Whole group is the "family", a big commune. When mother and father dies there is not much change for their kids, because the group will still share equally. In this case, by law of natural selection, Europeans with more h-g admixture should be more sharing/collective, while with more farmer admixture more possessive/individualistic, well family sharing oriented.

    I know the big argument, for north being more individualistic, is an example of people of the north being entrepreneurial capitalist in nature, therefore more greedy-individualistic. I'm sure the entrepreneurs need to be individualistic-leader like, but the biggest part in it is that ones from north are more collective (more hunter gatherer). It means that they will embrace anybody from society to work in their company and most importantly in management, as long as they have the best skills for positions. Entrepreneur from south will be more inclined to give positions to immediate family first, the farmer's way. Therefore he will not get the best talent to run the company. Multiply this by last couple of hundreds of years of capitalism and voila, this little advantage of hiring better talent for positions is giving north Europe economic advantage over south. Mind you that south was economically ahead most of the history till 17th century, thanks to family-feudal oriented ways. The best way how to control production from the land. It sees that now however, in times of industrial and free market capitalist economy, the north is ahead. And it might be due to more collective nature of running business.

    Off course there will be other differences in character of people to account for north/south differences and how economies and countries are run. I was just emphasizing things suiting current discussion best.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •