J2b2-L283 (proto-illyrian)

As usual, you just try to displace the discussion far from any reasonning.

After all, you are the guy who is placing a 400 CE admixture above a 100 CE admixture because it suits your ideology.
You are the guy denying that migration/diffusion produces diversification :LOL:.

Yet, I was right lately :
-Location of Y15058 predicted by diversity : check !
-Z638 in the south predicted by diversification dynamics : check !
Likely, I'll keep going to be right with future data (and you'll keep cherry picking data ... ). Be prepared for some Z638 in the north too :LOL:

Yep probably you should stop replying to me ... but you will keep going ;) .
 
Well yes there two very interesting Daunian samples especially ORD009:

Distance to: ITA_Daunian:SGR002
0.04822567 HRV_MBA:I4332
0.04977726 ITA_Daunian:ORD009
0.04986320 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ004
0.05235255 ITA_Etruscan_PoggioRenzo:pRZ001
0.05281908 CHE_IA:SX18
0.05351022 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN001
0.05459409 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN013
0.05501516 HUN_LBA:I25504
0.05582612 SVN_EIA:I5692
0.05653730 ITA_Etruscan_Chiostraccio:UDC_P
0.05683961 SVN_EIA:I23978
0.05722009 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ006
0.05730353 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ008
0.05735746 HUN_MA_Szolad:SZ28
0.05747687 Bell_Beaker_ITA:I1979
0.05771377 SRB_BA_Maros:I23209
0.05786989 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I25510
0.05805128 ITA_Villanovan:RMPR1015
0.05813587 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I18531
0.05831200 ITA_Etruscan:RMPR474b
0.05840398 ITA_Etruscan_Magliano:MAG001
0.05856106 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN009
0.05857096 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:MOK20
0.05883529 ITA_Etruscan_Tarquinia:TAQ013
0.05891547 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I25512

Distance to: ITA_Daunian:ORD009
0.02981895 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:I23208
0.03083687 HRV_MBA:I4332
0.03313425 HUN_MA_Szolad:SZ28
0.03375870 HRV_EIA:I26742
0.03378740 ITA_Etruscan:RMPR474b
0.03450379 HRV_MBA:I4331
0.03479787 HUN_IA_La_Tene_o:I4998
0.03606988 HRV_Pop_CA:pOP39
0.03617607 SRB_BA_Maros:I23209
0.03618780 HUN_MA_Szolad:SZ43
0.03626469 HUN_IA_Syrmian_SremGroup:I18259
0.03647183 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN009
0.03711918 Bell_Beaker_CZE_late:pRU001.A0101
0.03823249 SVK_IA_Vekerzug:I11721
0.03842457 ITA_Rome_Late_Antiquity:RMPR33
0.03856108 SVN_EIA:I5692
0.03857368 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:MOK13
0.03893338 HRV_LIA_La_Tene:I26735
0.03899771 ITA_Tarquinia_EMA:TAQ022
0.03916572 HUN_IA_La_Tene:I18529
0.03918999 SRB_Mokrin_EBA_Maros:MOK20
0.03976882 HRV_EIA:I24882
0.03991316 ITA_Etruscan_Casenovole:CSN013
0.03992100 ITA_Rome_MA:RMPR55
0.04017425 HUN_BA:I7043

I don't think this is accidental for ORD009, despite mixing with the locals there. I'll have to look into details about some of those samples.

Well yes it is often Bosniaks claiming some Illyrian continuity. Those from Sandzak can claim a bit but ofc thats due to their Albanian origins. Serbs on poreklo do not claim any continuity. But in Croatian, Bosnian circles even among geneticists it used to be common to portray I2a Slav as indigenous.


Here Bosniak from Sandzak (he is actually I2a) on a panel Gothic origin of the Bosniaks at 1:45 says , "according to the research done by iGENEA when you add up nowhere except in Serbia and Montenegro was the Slavic component present, Illyrian was alot more present, and what is interesting is that according to their research the Illyrian component was more present in Bosnia than in Albania even though Albanians say all the time that their ancestors are Illyrians. But Illyrian component was proven to have been more present in Bosnia. And I was calculating, by some 30 % was the Illyrian component stronger in Yugoslavia than the Slavic component, so this country that we used to call Yugoslavia might have easily been called Illyria with much greater right".:LOL:


Croatian tv show about Bosnian pyramids, the Illyrian-Vedic civilization. This was from when it began. Ofc I2a 20000+ years old gene is always mentioned..:LOL:


"Illyrians are Slavs". Croatian theologist who is very popular in Serbia, but everywhere too. 10 times more people know of him than poreklo, casual people follow him..:LOL:


Him about Albanians, Caucasian Albania is there ofc.. :bigsmile: African E1b.. Albanian and Chechen blood feuding are related...

I heard there is at least one (maybe two) Bosnian IA sample in this upcoming study. I'm not sure I think he may be from the old Illyrian site of Vratnica central Bosnia, actually brooches found next to I18259 were found there too.

I4331, I4332, Early/Middle Bronze Age, 1700-1500 BCE

http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/05/09/135616
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/135616

I4331
mtDNA: I1a1
Y-DNA: J2b2a

I4332
mtDNA: W3a1
 
Etrurian sample is under CTS6190 : https://www.yfull.com/tree/J-Y45181/
Meaning he is inside the big Y15058 (or more exactely Z38240) diffusion area.
I would expect other Y15058 to be nearby the BY162321 sample (especially J-Z4133)

Daunian ones are likely either Y15058 or Z638. But sadly, as you say, we don't know for sure.

I am BY162321 and surely Y303177, from NorthWestern corner of Iberia. If I understand in the right way, your belief it?s my clade was bigger 2.100 years ago, but something made it almost dissappears inside its core origin area (Eastwards Alps), only flourishing in some Hallstatt migrating areas like North Italy or Western Iberia?
 
Matt-Painted Pottery Culture from all accounts was widespread in Central Greece, Northern Greece, Macedonia, Thessaly, Epirus and Southern Albania. It looks to be related to Middle Helladic Civilizations, obviously predating Doric but still Derite was to a degree right.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...ery_from_Alani_ancient_upper_Macedonia_Greece

https://www.ascsa.edu.gr/uploads/media/hesperia/147085.pdf

You just seem to want to give an explanation without quoting any particular study: https://www.researchgate.net/public..._Sibaritide_Area_CS_Calabria_-_southern_Italy

This culture was present in Calabria as well.

It doesn't go like that. Your confirmation bias is hitting hard on you. Otherwise, you are free to quote any study that links in particular Daunians, Messapians, and the other tribe to this culture. Feel free to prove us wrong.

If we see the distribution of Matt-Painted Pottery in South Italy, it shows up outside of Messapia proper (it seems more concentrated in Peucetia).

The channeled ware (Kanellure) in Grey however shows up in Kosova and North Albania, which is interesting.

SOURCE: https://aegeobalkanprehistory.kreas...bania-from-bronze-to-iron-age-in-the-balkans/

article_prehistoric-pottery_1-1024x918.jpg
 
I am BY162321 and surely Y303177, from NorthWestern corner of Iberia. If I understand in the right way, your belief it�s my clade was bigger 2.100 years ago, but something made it almost dissappears inside its core origin area (Eastwards Alps), only flourishing in some Hallstatt migrating areas like North Italy or Western Iberia?

Hi Davidtab,

Are you the "new" sample on current YFULL version ?
https://www.yfull.com/tree/J-FT273354/

If not, it would be interesting to look at when you splitted from the Brazilian sample (likely of Iberian origin too.)

Regarding the "path" of BY162321, it likely participated to a southern Hallstatt expansion circa 900 BCE (which is consistent with finding it in La Tène horizon by 300 BCE).
Some modern clades ended in Greece, some other in Iberia.

But without more samples, it is hard to say more about "how/when" it ended in Iberia.
Sadly Spain, like France, is poorly sampled with DNA tests. Thus we don't know much about "when" potential subclades diversified.
With time and a better sampling of spain, we may be able to have some hints about "when" it arrived.
But probably more BY162321 are hidding in Spain and France.

Above BY162321, Z38240 (and even Y15058 more generally) appeared to have experienced a big diffusion around 1800-1700 BCE.
My current, favorite model involves this diffusion occuring from eastern Alps.
By EIA, Z38240 is diffused all over north-western Balkans, north Italy, and eastern Alps.
Dispersion occured in two phases : the 1800-1700 BCE expansion, and a BA-collapse-related event (possibly a post-bottle-neck recovery). Entrance in Etruria is tricky to handle, it could have arrived "early" or way later with the 900 BCE expansion for instance.

Your clade likely was in the northern part of Y15058 area since its expansion and later fell under Hallstatt/La Tène influence.
The Italian and the Sardinian sample below BY161113 splited near the moment of the Z38240 expansion. It is not very surprising to find them in the whole Z38240 area (and they didn't say much more about BY262321 post Z38240 stage).
The Italian sample from Bari may involves some relation with the IA Daunians, but without more samples it is hard to estimate "when" it settled there.
The Patterson et al. 2021 paper is gold for your clade, as it revealed a very wide area of diffusion illustrating how your paternal line and cousin branches where dominating the region during EIA (and likely since MBA).

Then for your specific clade, I think there is little to no doubts of a Hallstatt-La Tène relation around 900 BCE.
After that, we need more samples to know if it arrives "early" in Spain (diffused by Celts) or if it is a later injection following another population movement.

Good research, hopefully some new samples on your branch (either modern or ancient will pop-out soon) :).
G.
 
Last edited:
"Beyond the effect around 0 CE likely linked with Romans, we could also note that Illyrian-clade identified during EIA in western Balkans (Patterson et al. 2021) didn't went through a large European dispersion but nearly got extinct (J-Y86930)"

We are not extincted, we are still there. Hundreds of us.
 
If we see the distribution of Matt-Painted Pottery in South Italy, it shows up outside of Messapia proper (it seems more concentrated in Peucetia).

The channeled ware (Kanellure) in Grey however shows up in Kosova and North Albania, which is interesting.

SOURCE: https://aegeobalkanprehistory.kreas...bania-from-bronze-to-iron-age-in-the-balkans/

article_prehistoric-pottery_1-1024x918.jpg

To me it looks like this map might be wrong both for Kanellure and Matt-Painted Pottery. But who knows. Matt-Painted doesn't seem to have any presence in Peucetia from Italian archeological records, unless i didn't encounter.
 
"Beyond the effect around 0 CE likely linked with Romans, we could also note that Illyrian-clade identified during EIA in western Balkans (Patterson et al. 2021) didn't went through a large European dispersion but nearly got extinct (J-Y86930)"
We are not extincted, we are still there. Hundreds of us.

Sorry for the rough formulation :) .
I was meaning that the number of modern YFULL-samples (5) is not "big" for a ~2800 years old clade.
If we compare with Z631 for instance (~2900 years old, with ~150 samples on YFULL).

Likely, you are thousands of living peoples below J-Y86930 :) . Maybe the wording "nearly extinct" was a bit too hard ;) .
 
To me it looks like this map might be wrong both for Kanellure and Matt-Painted Pottery. But who knows. Matt-Painted doesn't seem to have any presence in Peucetia from Italian archeological records, unless i didn't encounter.

Maybe, some of the main books on Matt-Painted pottery in Italy don't seem to be online unfortunately.


From this site:

"Hence, R.J. Buck (1964, 280) saw the emergence of mattpainted pottery as evidence of an immigrating people known at the time as the “Minyans”, and F. Matz linked their derivation with the essential ethnogenesis of the Greeks themselves (1962, 162).

Similarly, the derivation of mattpainted pottery is seen in close association with the “Illyrian people” in Albania. Thus, Prendi explains the appearance of mattpainted pottery in the Devoll valley as the continuous indigenous development of the Illyrians, which would predate that in Macedonia and Epirus and – emanating from Albania – would have influenced these regions.
3

N.G.L. Hammond (1967, 390), on the contrary, connects the dissemination of mattpainted pottery with immigration of the Dorians and postulates a movement of transhumant shepherds from Epirus through Macedonia. J. Vokotopoulou (1986, 255 ff.) views Late Bronze Age mattpainted pottery in Macedonia as the result of a migration of “Macedonian tribes” from central Greece to the north and northeast.




Fig. 1. Distribution of Mattpainted Pottery in Middle and Late Bronze Ages.
article_phenomenom-of-mattpainted-pottery_1-300x236.jpg



Going by the distribution, it doesn't make that much sense to argue Illyrian otherwise we should expect those regions to have some heavy Illyrian presence. Dorians does make sense. Albanoid doesn't make sense unless you are arguing Macedonian was Albanoid.


SOURCE:

https://aegeobalkanprehistory.kreas...f-mattpainted-pottery-in-the-northern-aegean/
 
Maybe, some of the main books on Matt-Painted pottery in Italy don't seem to be online unfortunately.


From this site:

"Hence, R.J. Buck (1964, 280) saw the emergence of mattpainted pottery as evidence of an immigrating people known at the time as the “Minyans”, and F. Matz linked their derivation with the essential ethnogenesis of the Greeks themselves (1962, 162).

Similarly, the derivation of mattpainted pottery is seen in close association with the “Illyrian people” in Albania. Thus, Prendi explains the appearance of mattpainted pottery in the Devoll valley as the continuous indigenous development of the Illyrians, which would predate that in Macedonia and Epirus and – emanating from Albania – would have influenced these regions.
3

N.G.L. Hammond (1967, 390), on the contrary, connects the dissemination of mattpainted pottery with immigration of the Dorians and postulates a movement of transhumant shepherds from Epirus through Macedonia. J. Vokotopoulou (1986, 255 ff.) views Late Bronze Age mattpainted pottery in Macedonia as the result of a migration of “Macedonian tribes” from central Greece to the north and northeast.




Fig. 1. Distribution of Mattpainted Pottery in Middle and Late Bronze Ages.
article_phenomenom-of-mattpainted-pottery_1-300x236.jpg



Going by the distribution, it doesn't make that much sense to argue Illyrian otherwise we should expect those regions to have some heavy Illyrian presence. Dorians does make sense. Albanoid doesn't make sense unless you are arguing Macedonian was Albanoid.


SOURCE:

https://aegeobalkanprehistory.kreas...f-mattpainted-pottery-in-the-northern-aegean/

Yeah i agree, i actually left at the words of Aspurg regarding Matt-Painted Pottery Culture. And i was surprised to find out when i digged deeper into it how innacurate his claims were. He just made it as facade claim, he saw that map and linked immediately with the Daunians without investigating it further.
 
Hello Ghurier,

I am not him. He is a man from the Americas, but of Iberian paternal origin. It?s a surprise this clade FT273354 is son of BY162321 (present today in Norway!! and 300 ybp near Middle Danube) staying today in Greece and in the other side of Europe: Western Iberia. The brazilian man of Yfull told me he is not sure but he believes his paternal ancestor is from Northern Portugal, I am from Northwestern Galicia and the Puertorrican man is surnamed Torres, which could be a surname from some places in Iberia, but it?s quite common in Southern Galicia, so between my place of origin and Northern Portugal.

I believe if this clade Y303177 was common in Central and Eastern Iberia, it would appear quite more individuals from the Americas (where the DNA tests are much more common than in Spain and Portugal) with Iberian origin.

One thing is coming to my mind now, surely it?s not right, but... Lusitanians were a IE tribe from Western Iberia, and its language seems to be related someway to Italic by some authors, meanwhile Gallaeci language seems to be celtic or at last, IE. If the migrating was around 900 bc, perhaps this clade could be related to IE Lusitanians (WIberia) and Gallaeci (NWIberia). Perhaps this clade is related to an specifically migrating related to these IE Iberian people.
 
Hi,

The brazilian man of Yfull told me he is not sure but he believes his paternal ancestor is from Northern Portugal, I am from Northwestern Galicia and the Puertorrican man is surnamed Torres, which could be a surname from some places in Iberia, but it�s quite common in Southern Galicia, so between my place of origin and Northern Portugal.

Look like all the known samples are very localised.
Yet the TMRCA of Y303177 is 1150 ybp, which is not that much indicative.
Thus, I guess arrival in north-western spain could date from ~650 BCE to 1200 CE. Which let a very wide possibility of population movements.

I believe if this clade Y303177 was common in Central and Eastern Iberia, it would appear quite more individuals from the Americas (where the DNA tests are much more common than in Spain and Portugal) with Iberian origin.

That's a very good point.

One thing is coming to my mind now, surely it�s not right, but... Lusitanians were a IE tribe from Western Iberia, and its language seems to be related someway to Italic by some authors, meanwhile Gallaeci language seems to be celtic or at last, IE. If the migrating was around 900 bc, perhaps this clade could be related to IE Lusitanians (WIberia) and Gallaeci (NWIberia). Perhaps this clade is related to an specifically migrating related to these IE Iberian people.

I think with more samples, if some diversification events (with diversity in Spain) starts to appears around 2nd century BCE, it may point toward an involment of the carriers in the Lusitanians War.
But then the question would remain ... on which side ? Because if such signal appear, I would mean that the Y303177 carriers could have arrived at that date, or were already part of the locals.

Probably the 900 BCE event was very central-europe related stuff, to my knowledge of Spain history (which is very-very-very bad for a dude who used to live 4 years in spain ... :( ), I think your clade reached Iberia at best around VII-VI centuries BCE.
After, as always with Y-DNA, we need more data.
 
edit: not important
 
Last edited:
it would not surprise me if the marker J2b-L283 came as part of the amber trade into illyrian Vindobona (Vienna ) and further south
https://www2.rgzm.de/Transformation/Noricum/NW_Struktur/Pannonia_Nordwest_Struktur_eng.htm

That is too late so not possible have you even seen the recent MBA Dalmatian, IA Illyrian and La Tene samples and their timeframe?

I4331, 1631-1521 BCE, Croatia_MBA Veliki Vanik J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y15058

I26726 1461 BCE, Croatia_MBA, Gudnja cave, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z638
I24345, ~950 BCE, Croatia_MBA_LBA_EIA, Velim-Kosa, J-L283
I23911, 844 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Smiljan, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y86930
I23995, 743 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Smiljan, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y86930
I24638, 681 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Smiljan, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y86930
I24639, 681 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Smiljan, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y86930
I26742, 700 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Jazinka Cave, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>Z38241
I24882, 662 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Mala Metaljka, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y86930


I4998, 300 BCE, Hungary_IA_LaTene, Vas county, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Y15058
I5691, 666 BCE, Slovenia_EIA, Novo mesto, Kapiteljska njive, J-L283>>Z615>Z597
I22940, 475 BCE, Slovenia_EIA, Zagorje ob Savi, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z2507
 
Last edited:
[FONT=&quot]
That is too late so not possible have you even seen the recent MBA Dalmatian, IA Illyrian and La Tene samples and their timeframe?

I4331, 1631-1521 BCE, Croatia_MBA Veliki Vanik J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y15058[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]I26726 1461 BCE, Croatia_MBA, Gudnja cave, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z638>Z1297[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I24345, ~950 BCE, Croatia_MBA_LBA_EIA, Velim-Kosa, J-L283[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I23911, 844 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Smiljan, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y86930[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I23995, 743 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Smiljan, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y86930[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I24638, 681 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Smiljan, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y86930[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I24639, 681 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Smiljan, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y86930[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I26742, 700 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Jazinka Cave, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>Z38241[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I24882, 662 BCE, Croatia_EIA, Mala Metaljka, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z38240>PH1602>Y86930[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]I4998, 300 BCE, Hungary_IA_LaTene, Vas county, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Y15058[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I5691, 666 BCE, Slovenia_EIA, Novo mesto, Kapiteljska njive, J-L283>>Z615>Z597[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I22940, 475 BCE, Slovenia_EIA, Zagorje ob Savi, J-L283>>Z615>Z597>Z2507[/FONT]


amber trade started 2100BC
 
amber trade started 2100BC

The oldest known amber trade started in Sicily and does not have anything to do with the pathway of J2b-L283 or Illyrians in general so I don't know what you are getting at with this non sense. The amber trade in the Roman Republican era and after as a construct exists much later.

Also J2b-L283 in a South Eastern European context did not come "into" Illyrian lands it is Illyrian.
 

This thread has been viewed 495843 times.

Back
Top