Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Never getting the point, aren't you?
This is a great example of you being complete ignorant, and yet in your mind so educated.Nope. If it would be true, then Copernicus would be burned.
He not only was not burned, but he was a priest, who occiupy
coupld of important church offices. And his books were printing
without problems. Galileo was going to be burn for interpretations
of the Bible - for religion heresy - but not for scientific theories.
One atheist in Poland was behaded by civil authority for publishing
about atheism, what could ruin social order, and church was against
it - no fire, no church involved, no mass persecution.
.
And believing in God and the Bible doesn't mean you are against science.
Sent from my KIW-L21 using Tapatalk
No it didnt. Pascal , Descartes, Newton. They are literally the founders of modern science and they were all Christians and religious. The big bang theory was literally came up with by a Jesuit priest. Gregor Mendel was a Catholic monk with out him this forum wouldn't even be taking place. It's just absurd for atheists to claim some how science and religion are opposing each other. Religions that say God sits on a mountain and throws lightening bolts when it storms are a different type of religion. They could be described as explanitive religions. Judaism and Christianity were never like this.for a good chunk of the last 6000 years, it did mean being against science (censure).
But religions do evolve too, by now.
No it didnt. Pascal , Descartes, Newton. They are literally the founders of modern science and they were all Christians and religious. The big bang theory was literally came up with by a Jesuit priest. Gregor Mendel was a Catholic monk with out him this forum wouldn't even be taking place. It's just absurd for atheists to claim some how science and religion are opposing each other. Religions that say God sits on a mountain and throws lightening bolts when it storms are a different type of religion. They could be described as explanitive religions. Judaism and Christianity were never like this.
Sent from my KIW-L21 using Tapatalk
Keep in mind that everybody was christian or a religious person in europe back then. Everybody was raised in strong religious convictions. We can say that everybody was strongly indoctrinated from first months of their lives in christianity. They wasted half of their scientific thinking trying to consolidate religious beliefs with science.No it didnt. Pascal , Descartes, Newton. They are literally the founders of modern science and they were all Christians and religious. The big bang theory was literally came up with by a Jesuit priest. Gregor Mendel was a Catholic monk with out him this forum wouldn't even be taking place. It's just absurd for atheists to claim some how science and religion are opposing each other. Religions that say God sits on a mountain and throws lightening bolts when it storms are a different type of religion. They could be described as explanitive religions. Judaism and Christianity were never like this.
Sent from my KIW-L21 using Tapatalk
Religion has it's own rules and methods and science has it own. Believing or not in God has nothing to do with it.
For many centuries there have been Miracles and Saints and Divine interventions.
Any scientist going against such religious claims with empiric facts, would at least have been banished.
Do you agree?
Coexistance of science and religion is relatively young.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion.
We no longer can
we have to
We can say
Keep in mind that everybody was christian or a religious person in europe back then.
Believing or not in God has nothing to do with it.
This is a great example of you being complete ignorant, and yet in your mind so educated.
Copernik was not only astronomer but also quite accomplished economist. He wrote books on economy, which were printed and read during his lifetime. However, the book on heliocentrism, though finished way before his death and shown to few trusted people, was published only after his death, according to Copernicus wish.
Rethel,
Bacteria in hospitals evolve very fast.
We need new antibiotics quickly to be able to contrast the rate of their adaptation.
So how do you propose to solve it?
Actually you are right, becasue beliving God has everything to do with it!
If someone does not belive him, his beliving in him is worthless.
Rethel,
sorry I might believe in God, but maybe I prefer to believe Lilith.
Just joking, but please don't be so quick at throwing a judgement about what is/is not worth it.
Btw, I have a question to the moderators regarding the rules of the forum:
Is blasphemy allowed or not?
Which statements strike you as blasphemous? I have to confess that where certain threads are concerned I don't read them unless I get a complaint or notice in the activity thread either a question or a particularly egregious comment.
What is allowed is pretty broad, as you can see once you've been here a while. What I'd really like is the ability to give infractions or bans for abject stupidity and ignorance, for which I don't have the tolerance you seem to possess, but alas, I don't have it.
You can deny it all u want, modern science stemmed from very religious people who cited their faith many times as an inspiration for their research and never considered it a hindrance or a contradiction to what they were doing. They were highly educated and enlightened individuals, they weren't just cradle Christians who never considered their faith and indoctrinated robots. Any one who doesn't agree with atheists is indoctrinated and can't think on his own....Keep in mind that everybody was christian or a religious person in europe back then. Everybody was raised in strong religious convictions. We can say that everybody was strongly indoctrinated from first months of their lives in christianity. They wasted half of their scientific thinking trying to consolidate religious beliefs with science.
Many books and stories in the Bible were never taken literally, St Augustine wrote about this in the 4th century only American protestantism claims the Bible should be interpreted as 100 percent literal in every scripture.Exactly, for last couple of hundreds of years we see how christian beliefs are updated and evolve to accommodate our understanding of science. We no longer can take bible literally. Instead we have to interpret it in the way, in new way, so it is not in conflict with science. Well, but few, who are trying to "bend" and discredit science to have their bible in literary sense.
Have you ever wondered, if All Mighty God can create a rock so big that even he can't lift?
This thread has been viewed 57873 times.