I agree that uniparentals are good for tracing migration paths. The fact that my father was U-152 confirms, as ancient dna also now confirms, that a y line originating somewhere in far eastern Europe, and carrying some amount of ANE and EHG, at some point arrived in Italy, and that those people contributed to his ancestry, autosomal as well as yline, along with, of course, autosomal contributions of people with much different y lines.
The same actually goes for my mtdna.
I'm not about to go identifying with Central Europeans or French people who have U152, or Northern Europeans who have mtDna U2e.
What you are ignoring is all the dna passed down to you from all of the women in your history, as well as all the non direct y line men.
Perhaps what you're doing is trying to distinguish yourself from the peoples around you through yDna, or lay claim to certain lands through it. The first won't work, imo,because in total similarity you're not all that different, since that yDna is 2% of what you are, and the second is dangerous, and, in my opinion, meaningless.
You have a very "tribal" way of thinking, it seems to me. Perhaps you think that a "tribe" of people carrying certain y lines arrived in your area and Albanians are completely descended from them. I highly doubt that. Since at least the Neolithic the Balkans weren't empty. Any group arriving mingled its genes with those of the prior inhabitants. There's no "pure" tribe or group of people. We're all products of endless mixing, albeit with long periods of stasis in between.
People who think in "tribal" terms pick a period, a group, and completely define themselves by that group and its uniparental markers. I think that's a very illogical and also dangerous way to look at the world. The world functions much better without tribalism, imo. Look at Saudi Arabia and the rest of the middle east, and Africa.
But hey, I'm not here to lecture you; you'll do as you wish.