Forum | Europe Travel Guide | Facts & Trivia | Genetics | History | Linguistics |
Austria | France | Germany | Ireland | Italy | Portugal | Spain | Switzerland |
![]() |
Hi everybody.
I'm a Central Italian from Lazio.
These are my results.
Europe 77.6%
Europe (South) 61.3%
Great Britain and Ireland 15.1%
Europe (East) 1.2%
Near East 20.7%
Levant 11%
North Turkey 9.8%
Asia (South) 1.6%
Balochistan 1.6%
On 23andme (It's supposed to go 500 years far back in time while LivingDNA 10 generations) I have no MENA, no Sardinia, no Asia but I have 3% north western Europe and 0.2% east Europe.
Imo, in my case the results aren't very accurate.
Perhaps a lack of reference populations from Italy?
You are correct, it is a lack of reference populations in Italy.
Administrator of the Young Family Project
Genetic genealogy enthusiast
[QUOTE=srdceleva;518156]The ethnicity is really beta right now. No way you have that high of Levant or British dna. Hopefully it will get better.]
They need to collect more data from big countries like Italy, France and Spain as they are doing in Germany.
I hope that it soon will be.
Europe 77.6%
Europe (South) 61.3%
South Italy 24.6%
Tuscany 19.8%
Iberian Peninsula 9.8%
Aegean 3.8%
North Italy 1.8%
Sardinia 1.3%
Great Britain and Ireland 15.1%
Southeast England 3.8%
East Anglia 2.9%
South England 2.5%
Northumbria 2.1%
South Wales Border 2%
South Central England 1.8%
Europe (East) 1.2%
West Balkans 1.2%
Near East 20.7%
Levant 11%
North Turkey 9.8%
Asia (South) 1.6%
Balochistan 1.6%
hello, i did test with living DNA, the results give a 29 percent of the brittany, second it can be reliable or living as an english company increases
Carried out my autosomal loading the raw data from 23andMe on Living DNA a few months ago.
Honestly the results seem a bit strange: it provides me with a combination of about 90% European + 10% of Near East (8.4% from Northern Turkey and 1.8% "Kurdish").
I always wonder if it is an ancient contribution from the Bronze Age/first Iron Age or from a more recent legacy, mediated through the Byzantines. If so, I would call into question certain byzantine settlers of the Justinian regiments. They are documented in the area: “Armeni”, “Persoarmeni,” “Persoiustiniani”…
But I still have the doubt that this same quota is actually an artificial component to fix an autosomal of northern/central Italy that would otherwise be too unbalanced towards France and Spain. Even my Scandinavian share is very suspicious, for the same reasons: I think it serves to fix an average that would otherwise be too southern.
I think that Living has yet to collect many italian samples to return a more accurate picture.
Attachment 10559