Ancient Greek textiles closer to Near Eastern, Italian closer to Central European

kostop

Regular Member
Messages
56
Reaction score
26
Points
0
Ethnic group
Greek
Y-DNA haplogroup
R1b - Z2110
mtDNA haplogroup
H28a
Analysis of Iron Age textiles indicates that during c. 1000 - 400 BC Italy shared the textile culture of Central Europe, while Greece was largely influenced by the traditions of ancient Near East

In archaeological contexts, textiles are relatively rare finds, especially in Mediterranean Europe where conditions are unfavourable for organic material preservation. Many archaeological textile fragments do, however, survive in mineralised form, which forms the basis of a new study published today in Antiquity.
Detailed analysis of several hundred textile fragments has provided, for the first time, a much more detailed definition of the textile cultures in Italy and Greece during the first half of the first millennium BC.
According to Dr Margarita Gleba, the study’s author and researcher at the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, “Luckily for us, during the Iron Age (c. 1000-400 BC) people were buried with a lot of metal goods such as personal ornaments, weapons and vessels. These objects are conducive to the preservation of textiles as the metal effectively kills off the micro-organisms which would otherwise consume the organic materials, while at the same time metal salts create casts of textile fibres, thereby preserving the textile microsctructure.”
“This is how we get such a large sample of textiles, even though they only exist now in tiny fragments. Through meticulous analysis using digital and scanning electron microscopy, high performance liquid chromatography and other advanced methods we are able to determine a lot of information including the nature of the raw materials and structural features such as thread diameter, twist direction, type of weaving or binding, and thread count.”
The differences in these technical features suggest that during the Iron Age, textiles in Italy more closely resembled those found in Central Europe (associated with the Hallstatt culture that was prevalent in modern-day Germany, Austria and Slovenia) while the textile culture of Greece was largely connected with the ancient Near East.
Dr Gleba added, “There is overwhelming evidence for frequent contact between Italy and Greece during the first half of the first millennium BC, but this evidence shows that their textile traditions were technically, aesthetically and conceptually very different. This means that the populations in these two regions are making an active decision to clothe themselves in a certain way and it may have to do with traditions set up already in the Bronze Age.”
“Textiles have been and still are widely considered one of the most valuable indicators of individual and group identity. Even in societies today, we frequently form opinions of others based on the type of cloth they are wearing: tweed is associated with Irish and British country clothing, cashmere with Central Asia and silk with the Far East for example.”
“Curiously, by Roman times, the establishment of Greek colonies in southern Italy and more general oriental influences observed in material culture of Italic populations lead towards gradual disappearance of the indigenous textile tradition. Our future research will attempt to understand the cause behind this change in textile culture.”
This research was funded by the European Research Council (project FP/2007-2013-312603 PROCON - Production and Consumption: Textile Economy and Urbanisation in Mediterranean Europe 1000–500 BCE).
The original article is available open access here: https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2017.144

 
Last edited:
maybe it was the other way around, Near Eastern textiles were Greek
during late bronze age - the time of the Myceneans, the Aegean was known by the Egyptians as a supplier of textiles
 
maybe it was the other way around, Near Eastern textiles were Greek
during late bronze age - the time of the Myceneans, the Aegean was known by the Egyptians as a supplier of textiles

This could be the case.


zfZK7tL.png

https://youtu.be/bRcu-ysocX4?t=4m11s

The Bronze age was a time of ancient globalization. Thus it was a time of trade of goods and ideas. I believe textiles would sort of be arbitrary at this point; I could be wrong.

Moreover, Greeks adopted other Near Eastern aspects of culture, and advancement like the alphabet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenician_alphabet
The Phoenician alphabet is derived from Egyptian hieroglyphs.[4] It became one of the most widely used writing systems, spread by Phoenician merchants across the Mediterranean world, where it evolved and was assimilated by many other cultures. The Paleo-Hebrew alphabet is a local variant of the Phoenician alphabetical script.[5] Another derivative script is the Aramaic alphabet, which was the ancestor of the modern Arabic script. The Modern Hebrew script is a stylistic variant of the Aramaic script. The Greek alphabet (and by extension its descendants, such as Latin, Cyrillic, Runic, and Coptic) was also derived from Phoenician.

The political institution known as the City-state.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumer

Sumer (/ˈsuːmər/)[note 1] was the first urban civilization in the historical region of southern Mesopotamia, modern-day southern Iraq, during the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze ages, and arguably the first civilization in the world with Ancient Egypt and the Indus Valley.[1] Living along the valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates, Sumerian farmers were able to grow an abundance of grain and other crops, the surplus of which enabled them to settle in one place. Proto-writing in the prehistory dates back to c. 3000 BC. The earliest texts come from the cities of Uruk and Jemdet Nasr and date back to 3300 BC; early cuneiform script writing emerged in 3000 BC.[2]

These were also institutions adopted by other civilizations that came after. It doesn't indicate much about identity.
 
This could be the case.




The Bronze age was a time of ancient globalization. Thus it was a time of trade of goods and ideas. I believe textiles would sort of be arbitrary at this point; I could be wrong.

Moreover, Greeks adopted other Near Eastern aspects of culture, and advancement like the alphabet.



The political institution known as the City-state.



These were also institutions adopted by other civilizations that came after. It doesn't indicate much about identity.

Indeed. It's hard to know when pots, or textiles in this case, were just pots, and when they can be presumed to be stand ins for people.
 

This thread has been viewed 3192 times.

Back
Top